Chinese Geographical Science

, Volume 28, Issue 1, pp 137–152 | Cite as

Evolution Characteristics of Government-Industry-University-Research Cooperative Innovation Network for China’s Agriculture and Influencing Factors: Illustrated According to Agricultural Patent Case

Article
  • 43 Downloads

Abstract

Under the special background of China, the cooperative innovation between different government-industry-universityresearch institutes plays an increasingly important role in the agricultural field. However, the existing literature has paid little attention to it. Considering the cooperation patents, published in the agriculture field stemming from the Full-text Database of China Patents as the study object, the spatial and institutional attribute of the authors as the data source, and by combining the social network and spatial econometrics analysis, this paper analyzes the structure evolution characteristics of cooperative innovation networks of agricultural government-industry-university-research institute in the city level of China in 1985–2014, based on the triple helix theory, with the influence factors discussed. This shows that, 1) since 1985, China’s agricultural innovation level has been substantially increased, but the development degree of the cooperative innovation network is low, and the patent cooperation mainly relies on authors in the same unit; 2) enterprises play a leading role in the agricultural cooperative innovation. The effect of the government and hybrid organizations driven by the government is not obvious; 3) the cooperative innovation in the province and city dominates, and a multi-pole pattern has been formed. The cooperative innovation network structure evolves from a single helix empty core and double helix multi core to a double helix hierarchical network; 4) the city’s science, education funding and personnel investment are key factors determining the agricultural cooperative innovation, while the agricultural development of the city presents slight negative impacts on it. The spatial mismatch of supply and demand is present in the technical cooperative innovation of China’s agriculture. Therefore, the science enhancement and education investment to big agricultural provinces should be promptly implemented.

Keywords

cooperation innovation networks government-industry-university-research institute China’s agricultural patent Social Network Analysis (SNA) 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Baige-Gil A, 2010. Cooperation-based innovators and peripheral cooperators: an empirical analysis of their characteristics and behavior. Technovation, 30(3): 195–206. doi: 10.1016/j. technovation.2009.11.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Borgatti S P, Everett M G, Freeman L C, 2002. Ucinet for Windows: Software for Social Network Analysis. Harvard, MA: Analytic Technologies.Google Scholar
  3. Boschma R, 2005. Proximity and innovation: a critical assessment. Regional Studies, 39(1): 61–74. doi:10.1080/003434005 2000320887CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Boschma R, Frenken K, 2010. The spatial evolution of innovation networks: a proximity perspective. In: Boschma R A, Martin R (eds). Evolutionary Economic Geography. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bosch-Sijtsema P M, Postma T J B M, 2009. Cooperative innovation projects: capabilities and governance mechanisms. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 26(1): 58–70. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5885.2009.00334.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Broekel T, Boschma R, 2012. Knowledge networks in the Dutch aviation industry: the proximity paradox. Journal of Economic Geography, 12(2): 409–433. doi: 10.1093/jeg/lbr010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Broström A, 2011. The Triple Helix: University-industry-government innovation in action-By Henry Etzkowitz. Papers in Regional Science, 90(2): 441–442. doi: 10.1111/j.1435-5957.2011.00357.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chen Hongxi, 2009. Study on the mode and mechanism of the cooperation of government, industry, and university and research institute based on the triple helix theory. Science & Technology Progress and Policy, 26(24): 6–8. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  9. Cohen W M, Klepper S, 1992. The tradeoff between firm size and diversity in the pursuit of technological progress. Small Business Economics, 4(1): 1–14. doi: 10.1007/BF00402211Google Scholar
  10. Etzkowitz H, 2008. The Triple Helix: University–Industry–Government Innovation in Action. London: Routledge, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Farinha L, Ferreira J, Gouveia B, 2016. Networks of innovation and competitiveness: a triple helix case study. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 7(1): 259–275. doi: 10.1007/s13132-014-0218-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Balland P A, Boschma R, Frenken K, 2015. Proximity and innovation: from statics to dynamics. Regional Studies, 49(6): 907–920. doi: 10.1080/00343404.2014.883598CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Park H W, Hong H D, Leydesdorff L, 2005. A comparison of the knowledge-based innovation systems in the economies of South Korea and the Netherlands using Triple Helix indicators. Scientometrics, 65(1): 3–27. doi: 10.1007/s11192-005-0257-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hong Jin, Yu Wentao, Guo Xiumei et al., 2014. Creative industries agglomeration, regional innovation and productivity growth in china. Chinese Geographical Science, 24(2): 258–268. doi: 10.1007/s11769-013-0617-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Li Erling, Li Xiaojian, Liu Zhigao, 2011. Relationships and evolving networks of rural manufacturing clusters: a case study in Yucheng County, Henan Province of China. Chinese Geographical Science, 21(3): 364–376. doi: 10.1007/s11769-011-0449-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Li Dandan, Wang Tao, Wei Yehua et al., 2015. Spatial and temporal complexity of scientific knowledge networkand technological knowledge network on China’s urban scale. Geographical Research, 34(3): 525–540. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  17. Liefner I, Hennemann S, 2011. Structural holes and new dimensions of distance: the spatial configuration of the scientific knowledge network of China’s optical technology sector. Environment and Planning A, 43(4): 810–829. doi: 10.1068/a 43100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Liu Donghe, Shi Jianjun, 2009. Spatial econometric analysis of regional innovation and influencing factors. Science and Technology Management Research, (10): 198–199. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  19. Luo Wei, Tang Yuanhu, 2000. Cooperative innovation: a literature review. Studies in International Technology and Economy, 3(4): 42–50. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  20. Lu Lachang, Huang Ru, 2012. Urban hierarchy of innovation capability and inter-city linkages of knowledge in post-reform China. Chinese Geographical Science, 22(5): 602–616. doi: 10.1007/s11769-012-0555-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lu Guoqing, Zeng Gang, Guo Jinlong, 2014. Innovation network system of industry-university-research institute of equipment manufacturing industry in the Changjiang River Delta. Scientia Geographical Sinica, 34(9): 1051–1059. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  22. Ren Jinluan, Lu Jiannan, 2003. Research on the compound triple helix innovation system model. Studies in Science of Science, 21(5): 546–551. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  23. Sorenson O, Rivkin J W, Fleming L, 2006. Complexity, networks and knowledge flow. Research Policy, 35(7): 994–1017. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2006.05.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. The Department of Urban Social and Economic Surveys of NBS, 2015. China City Statistical Yearbooks. China Statistics Press, 13–362.Google Scholar
  25. Tu J, Gu S L, Wu G S, 2005. A new pattern of technology transfer in rural China: triple helix of academy-agriculture-government relations in Baoji city. Asian Journal of Technology Innovation, 13(2): 157–178. doi: 10.1080/19761597.2005.9668612CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Tu Zhenzhou, Gu Xin, 2013. Study on process of industry-university-research institute collaborative innovation based on knowledge flow. Studies in Science of Science, 31(9): 1381–1390. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  27. Walters D, Rainbird M, Archer N P, 2007. Cooperative innovation: a value chain approach. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 20(5): 595–607. doi: 10.1108/1741039071 0823725CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Wang Qiuyu, Zeng Gang, Lyu Guoqing, 2016. Structural evolution of innovation networks of China’s equipment manufacturing industry. Acta Geographica Sinica, 71(2): 251–264. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  29. Wasserman S, Faust K, 1994. Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Wu Wei, Chen Liping, 2007. To analyse and to construct of the cooperative innovation networks of industry-universityresearch institution network. Value Engineering, 26(1): 32–35. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  31. Zhuang Tao, Wu Hong, 2013. Study on measure of Triple Helix Based on the patent data from China. Management World, (8): 175–176. (in Chinese)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Science Press, Northeast Institute of Geography and Agricultural Ecology, CAS and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Erling Li
    • 1
    • 2
  • Fei Yao
    • 1
    • 2
  • Jiaxin Xi
    • 3
  • Chunyang Guo
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Key Research Institute of Yellow River Civilization and Sustainable Development/Henan Collaborative Innovation Center for the Yellow River Civilization Heritage and Modern Civilization Construction/College of Environment and PlanningHenan UniversityKaifengChina
  2. 2.Collaborative Innovation Center of Urban-Rural Coordinated DevelopmentHenan Province, KaifengChina
  3. 3.Gemmological InstituteChina University of Geosciences (Wuhan)WuhanChina

Personalised recommendations