Use of consumer wearable devices to promote physical activity among breast, prostate, and colorectal cancer survivors: a review of health intervention studies
A growing amount of research has successfully incorporated Fitbit devices and other wearable activity trackers into technology-oriented lifestyle interventions to increase physical activity among cancer survivors.
The present review of this literature is based upon bibliographic searches in PubMed and CINAHL and relevant search terms. Articles published in English from January 1, 2009, through October 16, 2019, were considered.
A total of 1726 article citations were identified in PubMed and non-duplicates in CINAHL. After screening the abstracts or full texts of these articles and reviewing the references of previous review articles, we found 13 studies that met the eligibility criteria. Of these, 8 were randomized controlled trials, one was a pre-post-test trial, and 4 were qualitative studies (focus groups, in-depth interviews). The studies focused on breast cancer (n = 8), prostate cancer (n = 2), and colorectal cancer (n = 1), and the remainder focused on more than one cancer site.
Additional research is needed to examine the efficacy of consumer wearable devices in promoting physical activity and weight management among cancer survivors.
Implications for Cancer Survivors
Cancer survivors show an increase in physical activity when using consumer wearable activity trackers. Increased physical activity plays an important role in alleviating many adverse effects of breast cancer therapy as well as improving morbidity and mortality. Additional research such as clinical trials focused on the development of successful interventions utilizing these devices is warranted.
KeywordsCancer Physical activity Smartphone applications
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare they have no conflicts of interest.
This article does not contain any studies with human participants performed by the authors.
- 1.Schwartz A, de Heer HD, Bea JW. Initiating exercise interventions to promote wellness in cancer patients and survivors. Oncology (Williston Park). 2017;31:711–7.Google Scholar
- 3.Fox L, Wiseman T, Cahill D, et al. Barriers and facilitators to physical activity in men with prostate cancer: a qualitative and quantitative systematic review. Psychooncology 2019, in press.Google Scholar
- 4.Ndjavera W, Orange ST, O’Doherty AF, et al. Exercise-induced attenuation of treatment side-effects in newly diagnosed prostate cancer patients beginning androgen deprivation therapy: a randomized controlled trial BJU Int, in press.Google Scholar
- 9.Coughlin SS, Caplan L, Stone R, et al. A review of home-based physical activity interventions for breast cancer survivors. Current Cancer Reports 2019, in press.Google Scholar
- 10.Smith SA, Ansa BE, Yoo W, et al. Determinants of adherence to physical activity guidelines among overweight and obese African American breast cancer survivors: implications for an intervention approach. Ethnicity & Health, 2018, 23(2): 194–206.Google Scholar
- 15.Hartman SJ, Nelson SH, Cadmus-Bertram LA, et al. Technology- and phone-based weight loss intervention: pilot RCT in women at elevated breast cancer risk. Am J Prev Med 206;51:714–21.Google Scholar
- 20.Ferrante JM, Devine KA, Bator A, et al. Feasibility and potential efficacy of commercial mHealth/eHealth tools for weight loss in African American breast cancer survivors: pilot randomized controlled trial. Transl Behav Med 2018, in press.Google Scholar
- 21.Cadmus-Bertram L, Tevaarwerk AJ, Sesto ME, et al. Building a physical activity intervention into clinical care for breast and colorectal cancer survivors in Wisconsin: a randomized controlled pilot trial. J Cancer Surv 2019, in press.Google Scholar
- 22.Lynch BM, Nguyen NH, Moore MM, et al. A randomized controlled trial of a wearable technology-based intervention for increasing moderate to vigorous physical activity and reducing sedentary behavioral in breast cancer survivors: the Activate Trial. Cancer 2019, in press.Google Scholar
- 26.Kenfield SA, Van Blarigan EL, Ameli N, et al. Feasibility, acceptability, and behavioral outcomes from a technology-enhanced behavioral change intervention (Prostate 8): a pilot randomized controlled trial in men with prostate cancer. Eur Urol. 2019;950:8.Google Scholar
- 27.Gell NM, Tursi A, Grover KW, et al. Female cancer survivor perspectives on remote intervention components to support physical activity maintenance. Support Care Cancer 2019, in press.Google Scholar
- 28.Dreher N, Hadeler EK, Hartman SJ, et al. Fitbit usage in patients with breast cancer undergoing chemotherapy. Clinical Breast Cancer 2019, in press.Google Scholar
- 30.Nelson SH, Weiner LS, Natarajan L, et al. Continuous, objective measurement of physical activity during chemotherapy for breast cancer: the Activity in Treatment pilot study. Trans Behav Med 2019, in press.Google Scholar
- 31.Parks Associates. Global sales of connected digital fitness trackers will exceed 82 million in 2019. 2015.Google Scholar
- 32.Allied Market Research. Smartwatch market is expected to reach $32.9 billion by 2020. 2015.Google Scholar