Advertisement

Use of consumer wearable devices to promote physical activity among breast, prostate, and colorectal cancer survivors: a review of health intervention studies

  • Steven S. CoughlinEmail author
  • Lee S. Caplan
  • Rebecca Stone
Reviews

Abstract

Purpose

A growing amount of research has successfully incorporated Fitbit devices and other wearable activity trackers into technology-oriented lifestyle interventions to increase physical activity among cancer survivors.

Methods

The present review of this literature is based upon bibliographic searches in PubMed and CINAHL and relevant search terms. Articles published in English from January 1, 2009, through October 16, 2019, were considered.

Results

A total of 1726 article citations were identified in PubMed and non-duplicates in CINAHL. After screening the abstracts or full texts of these articles and reviewing the references of previous review articles, we found 13 studies that met the eligibility criteria. Of these, 8 were randomized controlled trials, one was a pre-post-test trial, and 4 were qualitative studies (focus groups, in-depth interviews). The studies focused on breast cancer (n = 8), prostate cancer (n = 2), and colorectal cancer (n = 1), and the remainder focused on more than one cancer site.

Conclusions

Additional research is needed to examine the efficacy of consumer wearable devices in promoting physical activity and weight management among cancer survivors.

Implications for Cancer Survivors

Cancer survivors show an increase in physical activity when using consumer wearable activity trackers. Increased physical activity plays an important role in alleviating many adverse effects of breast cancer therapy as well as improving morbidity and mortality. Additional research such as clinical trials focused on the development of successful interventions utilizing these devices is warranted.

Keywords

Cancer Physical activity Smartphone applications 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare they have no conflicts of interest.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants performed by the authors.

Informed consent

Not applicable.

References

  1. 1.
    Schwartz A, de Heer HD, Bea JW. Initiating exercise interventions to promote wellness in cancer patients and survivors. Oncology (Williston Park). 2017;31:711–7.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Gebruers N, Camberlin M, Theunissen F, et al. The effect of training interventions on physical performance, quality of life, and fatigue in patients receiving breast cancer treatment: a systematic review. Supportive Care Cancer. 2019;27:109–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Fox L, Wiseman T, Cahill D, et al. Barriers and facilitators to physical activity in men with prostate cancer: a qualitative and quantitative systematic review. Psychooncology 2019, in press.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ndjavera W, Orange ST, O’Doherty AF, et al. Exercise-induced attenuation of treatment side-effects in newly diagnosed prostate cancer patients beginning androgen deprivation therapy: a randomized controlled trial BJU Int, in press.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Shim YJ, Kim HJ, Oh SC, Lee SI, Choi SW. Exercise during adjuvant treatment for colorectal cancer: treatment completion, treatment-related toxicities, body composition, and serum level of adipokines. Cancer Manag Res. 2019;11:5403–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Coughlin SS, Stewart J. Use of consumer wearable devices to promote physical activity: a review of health intervention studies. J Environ Health Sci. 2016;2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Guercio BJ, Zhang S, Ou FS, Venook AP, Niedzwiecki D, Lenz HJ, et al. Associations of physical activity with survival and progression in metastatic colorectal cancer: results from cancer and leukemia group B (Alliance)/SWOG 80405. J Clin Oncol. 2019;37:2620–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    McTiernan A, Friedenreich CM, Katzmarzyk PT, Powell KE, Macko R, Buchner D, et al. Physical activity in cancer prevention and survival: a systematic review. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2019;51:1252–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Coughlin SS, Caplan L, Stone R, et al. A review of home-based physical activity interventions for breast cancer survivors. Current Cancer Reports 2019, in press.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Smith SA, Ansa BE, Yoo W, et al. Determinants of adherence to physical activity guidelines among overweight and obese African American breast cancer survivors: implications for an intervention approach. Ethnicity & Health, 2018, 23(2): 194–206.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Coughlin SS, Smith SA. The insulin-like growth factor axis adipokines, physical activity, and obesity in relation to breast cancer incidence and recurrence. Cancer and Clinical Oncology. 2015;4:24–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hartman SJ, Natarajan L, Palmer BW, Parker B, Patterson RE, Sears DD. Impact of increasing physical activity on cognitive functioning in breast cancer survivors: rationale and study design of Memory & Motion. Contemp Clin Trials. 2015;45:371–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Diaz KM, Krupka DJ, Chang MJ, Peacock J, Ma Y, Goldsmith J, et al. Fitbit: an accurate and reliable device for wireless physical activity tracking. Int J Cardiol. 2015;185:138–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Noah JA, Spierer DK, Gu J, et al. Comparison of steps and energy expenditure assessment in adults of Fitbit Tracker and Ultra to the Actical and indirect calorimetry. J Med Eng Technol. 2013;37:456–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hartman SJ, Nelson SH, Cadmus-Bertram LA, et al. Technology- and phone-based weight loss intervention: pilot RCT in women at elevated breast cancer risk. Am J Prev Med 206;51:714–21.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Nguyen NH, Hadfraft NT, Moore MM, et al. A qualitative evaluation of breast cancer survivors’ acceptance of and preference for consumer wearable technology activity trackers. Support Care Cancer. 2017;25:3375–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Valle CG, Deal AM, Tate DF. Preventing weight gain in African American breast cancer survivors using smart scales and activity trackers: a randomized controlled pilot study. J Cancer Surviv. 2017;11:133–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Gell NM, Grover KW, Humble M, Sexton M, Dittus K. Efficacy, feasibility, and acceptability of a novel technology-based intervention to support physical activity in cancer survivors. Support Care Cancer. 2017;25:1291–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Rosenberg D, Kadokura EA, Bouldin ED, et al. Acceptability of Fitbit for physical activity tracking within clinical care among men with prostate cancer. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2017;2016:1050–9.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ferrante JM, Devine KA, Bator A, et al. Feasibility and potential efficacy of commercial mHealth/eHealth tools for weight loss in African American breast cancer survivors: pilot randomized controlled trial. Transl Behav Med 2018, in press.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Cadmus-Bertram L, Tevaarwerk AJ, Sesto ME, et al. Building a physical activity intervention into clinical care for breast and colorectal cancer survivors in Wisconsin: a randomized controlled pilot trial. J Cancer Surv 2019, in press.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Lynch BM, Nguyen NH, Moore MM, et al. A randomized controlled trial of a wearable technology-based intervention for increasing moderate to vigorous physical activity and reducing sedentary behavioral in breast cancer survivors: the Activate Trial. Cancer 2019, in press.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Wu HS, Gal R, van Sleeuwen NC, et al. Breast cancer survivors’ experiences with an activity tracker integrated into a supervised exercise program: qualitative study. JMIR mHealth and uHealth 2019;7:e10820.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    McNeil J, Brenner DR, Stone CR, et al. Activity tracker to prescribe various exercise intensities in breast cancer survivors. Medicine and Science in Sports & Exercise. 2019;51:930–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Van Blarigan EL, Chan H, Van Loon K, et al. Self-monitoring and reminder text messages to increase physical activity in colorectal cancer survivors (Smart Pace): a pilot randomized controlled trial. BMC Cancer. 2019;19:218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Kenfield SA, Van Blarigan EL, Ameli N, et al. Feasibility, acceptability, and behavioral outcomes from a technology-enhanced behavioral change intervention (Prostate 8): a pilot randomized controlled trial in men with prostate cancer. Eur Urol. 2019;950:8.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Gell NM, Tursi A, Grover KW, et al. Female cancer survivor perspectives on remote intervention components to support physical activity maintenance. Support Care Cancer 2019, in press.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Dreher N, Hadeler EK, Hartman SJ, et al. Fitbit usage in patients with breast cancer undergoing chemotherapy. Clinical Breast Cancer 2019, in press.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Nyrop KA, Deal AM, Choi SK, Wagoner CW, Lee JT, Wood WA, et al. Measuring and understanding adherence in a home-based exercise intervention during chemotherapy for early breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2018;168:43–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Nelson SH, Weiner LS, Natarajan L, et al. Continuous, objective measurement of physical activity during chemotherapy for breast cancer: the Activity in Treatment pilot study. Trans Behav Med 2019, in press.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Parks Associates. Global sales of connected digital fitness trackers will exceed 82 million in 2019. 2015.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Allied Market Research. Smartwatch market is expected to reach $32.9 billion by 2020. 2015.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Wagoner CW, Choi SK, Deal AM, Lee JT, Wood WA, Muss HB, et al. Establishing physical activity in breast cancer: self-report versus activity tracker. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2019;176(2):395–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Population Health Sciences, Medical College of GeorgiaAugusta UniversityAugustaUSA
  2. 2.Institute of Public and Preventive HealthAugustaUSA
  3. 3.Morehouse School of MedicineAtlantaUSA

Personalised recommendations