Advertisement

Signal, Image and Video Processing

, Volume 12, Issue 6, pp 1181–1188 | Cite as

Familiar/unfamiliar face classification from EEG signals by utilizing pairwise distant channels and distinctive time interval

  • Abdurrahman Özbeyaz
  • Sami Arıca
Original Paper
  • 88 Downloads

Abstract

The aim of the study is to classify single trial electroencephalogram and to estimate active regions/locations on skull in unfamiliar/familiar face recognition task. For this purpose, electroencephalographic signals were acquired from ten subjects in different sessions. Sixty-one familiar and fifty-nine unfamiliar face stimuli were shown to the subjects in the experiments. Since channel responses are different for familiar and unfamiliar classes, the channels discriminating the classes were investigated. To do so, three distances and four similarity measures were employed to assess the most distant channel pairs between familiar and unfamiliar classes for a 1-s time duration; 0.6 s from the stimulus to 1.6 s in a channel selection process. It is experimentally observed that this time interval is maintaining the greatest distance between two categories. The electroencephalographic signals were classified using the determined channels and time interval to measure accuracy. The best classification accuracy was 81.30% and was obtained with the Pearson correlation as channel selection method. The most discriminative channel pairs were selected from prefrontal regions.

Keywords

Familiar/unfamiliar face stimuli Electroencephalogram Event-related potentials Channel selection Classification 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by The National Scientific Research Council of Turkey (TUBITAK)—Grant No. 2211-C and Adıyaman University’s Scientific Research Fund - Project Number: TIPBAP/2012-0008. The experiments were approved by a local ethics committee of the health sciences Institute of Adıyaman University. Ethics Committee Decision Number is 2012/07-2.3. All participants signed an informed consent.

References

  1. 1.
    Tanaka, J.W., Curran, T., Porterfield, A.L., Collins, D.: Activation of preexisting and acquired face representations: the N250 event-related potential as an index of face familiarity. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 18, 1488–1497 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Sun, D., Chan, C.C.H., Lee, T.M.C.: Identification and classification of facial familiarity in directed lying: an ERP study. PLoS ONE 7, e31250 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Çelik, U., Arıca, S.: Classification of evoked potentials of familiar and unfamiliar face stimuli using multi-resolution approximation based on excitatory post-synaptic potential waveform. Comput. Electr. Eng. 39, 1571–1584 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Özbeyaz, A., Arıca, S.: Classification of EEG signals of familiar and unfamiliar face stimuli exploiting most discriminative channels. Turk. J. Electr. Eng. Comput. Sci. 25, 3342–3354 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.3906/elk-1608-130 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kaufmann, T., Schulz, S.M., Grünzinger, C., Kübler, A.: Flashing characters with famous faces improves ERP-based brain–computer interface performance. J. Neural Eng. 8, 56016 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Jin, J., Allison, B.Z., Zhang, Y., Wang, X., Cichocki, A.: An ERP-based BCI using an oddball paradigm with different faces and reduced errors in critical functions. Int. J. Neural Syst. 24, 1450027 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Özbeyaz, A., Sami, A.: Biomedical data. https://sites.google.com/view/biomedicaldata/home
  8. 8.
    Zhu, X.: Information Theory. In: Advanced Natural Language Processing Lecture Notes. University of Wisconsin, Madison, p 3 (2010)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cover, T.M., Thomas, J.A.: Elements of Information Theory. Wiley, Hoboken (2006)MATHGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Matthews, B.W.: Comparison of the predicted and observed secondary structure of T4 phage lysozyme. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Protein Struct. 405, 442–451 (1975).  https://doi.org/10.1016/0005-2795(75)90109-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Schweinberger, S.R., Pickering, E.C., Jentzsch, I., Burton, A.M., Kaufmann, J.M.: Event-related brain potential evidence for a response of inferior temporal cortex to familiar face repetitions. Cogn. Brain Res. 14, 398–409 (2002).  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0926-6410(02)00142-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gouvea, A.C., Phillips, C., Kazanina, N., Poeppel, D.: The linguistic processes underlying the P600. Lang. Cogn. Processes 25(2), 149–188 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Rossion, B., Schiltz, C., Robaye, L., Pirenne, D., Crommelinck, M.: How does the brain discriminate familiar and unfamiliar faces? A PET study of face categorical perception. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 13, 1019–1034 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Haxby, J.V., Hoffman, E.A., Gobbini, M.I.: The distributed human neural system for face perception. Trends Cogn. Sci. 4, 223–233 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Leveroni, C.L., Seidenberg, M., Mayer, A.R., Mead, L.A., Binder, J.R., Rao, S.M.: Neural systems underlying the recognition of familiar and newly learned faces. J. Neurosci. 20, 878–886 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Guyton Arthur, C., Jhon, E.: Cerebral cortex, intellectual functions of the brain, learning and memory. In: William, S., Rebecca, G. (eds.) Textbook of Medical Physiology, pp. 714–727. Elsevier, Philadelphia (2006)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Faculty of EngineeringUniversity of AdiyamanAdiyamanTurkey
  2. 2.Department of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Faculty of EngineeringÇukurova UniversityAdanaTurkey

Personalised recommendations