Advertisement

TOP

pp 1–15 | Cite as

A matheuristic algorithm for the one-dimensional cutting stock and scheduling problem with heterogeneous orders

  • Anselmo Ramalho Pitombeira-NetoEmail author
  • Bruno de Athayde Prata
Original Paper

Abstract

Cutting stock and bin packing problems are common in several industrial sectors, such as paper, glass, furniture, steel industry, construction, transportation, among others. The classical cutting stock problem (CSP) ignores the production planning and scheduling of multiple customer orders. Nevertheless, in real industrial settings customer orders have to be planned and scheduled over time so as to meet demand and required due dates. We propose an integer linear programming model for the one-dimensional cutting stock and scheduling problem with heterogeneous orders. As this problem is a generalization of the classical single-period one-dimensional CSP, which is known to be NP-hard, it is difficult to solve real-sized instances to optimality. Thus, we propose a novel matheuristic algorithm based on a fix-and-optimize strategy hybridized with a random local search. The proposed matheuristic was tested on a set of 160 synthetic problem instances based on a real-world problem and compared with CPLEX solver. In larger instances, the proposed matheuristic performed better than CPLEX, with average relative percentage deviation (RPD) regarding objective values as high as 72%. On the other hand, in small instances CPLEX showed a marginal advantage, with best average RPD of 18% with relation to the matheuristic. We also performed a paired t-test with significance level 0.05 and null hypothesis: no difference between the proposed matheuristic and CPLEX. In small test instances, the performance of the proposed matheuristic was statistically indistinguishable from CPLEX, while in larger instances the matheuristic outperformed CPLEX in most cases with \(p\,\text {value} < 0.05\).

Keywords

Cutting and packing problems Order scheduling problems Fix-and-optimize Matheuristics 

Mathematics Subject Classification

90C10 90B35 90C59 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq; Grant No.: 422464/2016-3) for the financial support.

References

  1. Arbib C, Marinelli F (2005) Integrating process optimization and inventory planning in cutting-stock with skiving option: an optimization model and its application. Eur J Oper Res 163(3):617–630.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2003.12.021 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arbib C, Marinelli F (2014) On cutting stock with due dates. Omega 46:11–20.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2014.01.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Archetti C, Speranza MG (2014) A survey on matheuristics for routing problems. EURO J Comput Optim 2(4):223–246.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13675-014-0030-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Braga N, Alves C, Macedo R, de Carvalho JV (2015) A model-based heuristic for the combined cutting stock and scheduling problem. In: Gervasi O et al (eds) Computational science and its applications – ICCSA 2015. ICCSA 2015. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 9156. Springer, ChamGoogle Scholar
  5. Braga N, Alves C, de Carvalho J (2016a) Exact solution of combined cutting stock and scheduling problems. Lect Notes Econ Math 682:131–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Braga N, Alves C, Macedo R, de Carvalho JV (2016b) Combined cutting stock and scheduling: a matheuristic approach. Int J Innov Comput Appl 7(3):135–146.  https://doi.org/10.1504/IJICA.2016.078724 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Della Croce F, Salassa F (2014) A variable neighborhood search based matheuristic for nurse rostering problems. Ann Oper Res 218(1):185–199.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-012-1235-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dyckhoff H (1990) Cutting and packing a typology of cutting and packing problems. Eur J Oper Res 44(2):145–159.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(90)90350-K CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fanjul-Peyro L, Ruiz R (2011) Size-reduction heuristics for the unrelated parallel machines scheduling problem. Comput Oper Res 38(1):301–309.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cor.2010.05.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gramani MCN, França PM (2006) The combined cutting stock and lot-sizing problem in industrial processes. Eur J Oper Res 174(1):509–521.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2004.12.019 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kramer R, Subramanian A, Vidal T, Cabral LdAF (2015) A matheuristic approach for the pollution-routing problem. Eur J Oper Res 243(2):523–539.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2014.12.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Li S (1996) Multi-job cutting stock problem with due dates and release dates. J Oper Res Soc 47(4):490–510.  https://doi.org/10.1057/jors.1996.56 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lin SW, Ying KC (2016) Optimization of makespan for no-wait flowshop scheduling problems using efficient matheuristics. Omega 64:115–125.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2015.12.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Martello S (1990) Knapsack problems: algorithms and computer implementations. Wiley-Interscience series in discrete mathematics and optimiza tionGoogle Scholar
  15. Melega GM, de Araujo SA, Jans R (2018) Classification and literature review of integrated lot-sizing and cutting stock problems. Eur J Oper Res 271(1):1–19.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2018.01.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Melo MT, Nickel S, Saldanha-da Gama F (2014) An efficient heuristic approach for a multi-period logistics network redesign problem. TOP 22(1):80–108.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11750-011-0235-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Miranda PL, Morabito R, Ferreira D (2018) Optimization model for a production, inventory, distribution and routing problem in small furniture companies. TOP 26(1):30–67.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11750-017-0448-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Montgomery DC (2013) Design and analysis of experiments, 8th edn. Wiley, HobokenGoogle Scholar
  19. Nonås SL, Thorstenson A (2000) A combined cutting-stock and lot-sizing problem. Eur J Oper Res 120(2):327–342.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(99)00160-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Nonås SL, Thorstenson A (2008) Solving a combined cutting-stock and lot-sizing problem with a column generating procedure. Comput Oper Res 35(10):3371–3392.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cor.2007.03.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Ozer EA, Sarac T (2018) MIP models and a matheuristic algorithm for an identical parallel machine scheduling problem under multiple copies of shared resources constraints. TOP pp 1–31,  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11750-018-00494-x
  22. Poldi K, de Araujo S (2016) Mathematical models and a heuristic method for the multiperiod one-dimensional cutting stock problem. Ann Oper Res 238(1–2):497–520.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-015-2103-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Prata BA, Pitombeira-Neto AR, Sales CJM (2015) An integer linear programming model for the multiperiod production planning of precast concrete beams. J Constr Eng Manag 141(10):04015029.  https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000991 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Reinertsen H, Vossen T (2010) The one-dimensional cutting stock problem with due dates. Eur J Oper Res 201(3):701–711.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2009.03.042 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Trkman P, Gradisar M (2007) One-dimensional cutting stock optimization in consecutive time periods. Eur J Oper Res 179(2):291–301.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2006.03.027 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Wäscher G, HauSSner H, Schumann H (2007) An improved typology of cutting and packing problems. Eur J Oper Res 183(3):1109–1130.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2005.12.047 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Yanasse H (1997) On a pattern sequencing problem to minimize the maximum number of open stacks. Eur J Oper Res 100(3):454–463.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(97)84107-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Yanasse HH, Lamosa MJP (2007) An integrated cutting stock and sequencing problem. Eur J Oper Res 183(3):1353–1370.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2005.09.054 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Yuen B (1991) Heuristics for sequencing cutting patterns. Eur J Oper Res 25(2):183–190.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(91)90222-H CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Industrial EngineeringFederal University of CearáFortalezaBrazil

Personalised recommendations