Is there any relationship between quality of life and the level of sympathectomy in primary palmar hyperhidrosis? Single-center experience

  • Mustafa Vedat DogruEmail author
  • Celal Bugra Sezen
  • Oguz Girgin
  • Levent Cansever
  • Celalettin Ibrahim Kocaturk
  • Muzaffer Metin
  • Seyyit Ibrahim Dincer
Original Article



The discussions at the surgical levels (sympathectomy levels) about endoscopic thoracic sympathectomy (ETS) method, which is applied in hyperhidrosis treatment in the present day and acknowledged as the golden treatment method, continue. Mainly, most of the studies evaluates postoperative early period results. Our aim in this study is to compare the long-term quality of life depending on the different surgical levels (sympathectomy levels) and evaluate the postoperative complications.


165 patients operated due to palmar hyperhidrosis between January 2012 and July 2017 were evaluated. Sympathectomy was performed either by clipping or cauterization and sympathetic nerves included were T2–4, T3–4, or T3 levels. Data were retrospectively reviewed for complications, factors affecting the postoperative quality of life.


Ninety of the patients were male (54.5%) and 75 (45.5%) were female. The level of ganglion block was T2–T4 in 62 patients (37.6%), T3–T4 in 46 patients (27.9%), and T3 in 57 patients (34.5%). Early complications were observed in 27 patients (16.4%). Compensatory hyperhidrosis (CH) was observed in 62 patients (37.6%). There was a significant difference in the postoperative quality of life according to ETS level (p < 0.001). Patients who underwent T2–T4 sympathectomy had a lower quality of life than patients who underwent isolated T3 or T3–T4 sympathectomy.


Based on our results, we recommend performing lower level resections to increase the long-term quality of life in palmar hyperhidrosis patients. The lower risk of CH and comparable quality of life suggest that T3 sympathectomy is more effective.


Sympathectomy Quality of life Compensatory hyperhidrosis 


Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest related to this article.


  1. 1.
    Sezen CB, Akboğa SA, Süleymanov A, Gökçe A, Çelik A, Kurul İC. Is oxybutynin treatment as effective as surgery in palmar and axillary hyperhidrosis? Haseki Tip Bul. 2017;55:199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Yazbek G, Wolosker N, Kauffman P, de Campos JRM, Puech-Leão P, Jatene FB. Twenty months of evolution following sympathectomy on patients with palmar hyperhidrosis: sympathectomy at the T3 level is better than at the T2 level. Clinics. 2009;64:743–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Amir M, Arish A, Weinstein Y, Pfeffer M, Levy Y. Impairment in quality of life among patients seeking surgery for hyperhidrosis (excessive sweating): preliminary results. Isr J Psychiatry Relat Sci. 2000;37:25.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lin M, Tu YR, Li X, Lai FC, Chen JF, Dai ZJ. Comparison of curative effects of sympathectomy at different segments on palmar hyperhidrosis. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2006;86:2315–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cerfolio RJ, De Campos JRM, Bryant AS, Connery CP, Miller DL, DeCamp MM, et al. The society of thoracic surgeons expert consensus for the surgical treatment of hyperhidrosis. Ann Thorac Surg. 2011;91:1642–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Zhang W, Yu D, Wei Y, Xu J, Zhang X. A systematic review and meta-analysis of T2, T3 or T4, to evaluate the best denervation level for palmar hyperhidrosis. Sci Rep. 2017;7:1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Abd Ellatif ME, El Hadidi A, Musa AM, Askar W, Abbas A, Negm A, et al. Optimal level of sympathectomy for primary palmar hyperhidrosis: T3 versus T4 in a retrospective cohort study. Int J Surg. 2014;12:778–82.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Deng B, Tan Q-Y, Jiang Y-G, Zhao Y-P, Zhou J-H, Ma Z, et al. Optimization of sympathectomy to treat palmar hyperhidrosis: the systematic review and meta-analysis of studies published during the past decade. Surg Endosc. 2011;25:1893–901.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Yazbek G, Wolosker N, de Campos JRM, Kauffman P, Ishy A, Puech-Leão P. Palmar hyperhidrosis—which is the best level of denervation using video-assisted thoracoscopic sympathectomy: T2 or T3 ganglion? J Vasc Surg. 2005;42:281–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lee DY, Kim DH, Paik HC. Selective division of T3 rami communicantes (T3 ramicotomy) in the treatment of palmar hyperhidrosis. Ann Thorac Surg. 2004;78:1052–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Jie Y, Tan J, Ye G, Gu W, Jun W, Liu Y. T3/T4 thoracic sympathectomy and compensatory sweating in treatment of palmar hyperhidrosis. Chin Med J. 2007;120:1574–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Chang Y-T, Li H-P, Lee J-Y, Lin P-J, Lin C-C, Kao E-L, et al. Treatment of palmar hyperhidrosis: T4 level compared with T3 and T2. Ann Surg. 2007;246:330.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Wolosker N, Yazbek G, Ishy A, De Campos JRM, Kauffman P, Puech-Leao P. Is sympathectomy at T4 level better than at T3 level for treating palmar hyperhidrosis? J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech. 2008;18:102–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Li X, Tu Y-R, Lin M, Lai F-C, Chen J-F, Dai Z-J. Endoscopic thoracic sympathectomy for palmar hyperhidrosis: a randomized control trial comparing T3 and T2–4 ablation. Ann Thorac Surg. 2008;85:1747–51.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kim WO, Kil HK, Yoon KB, Yoon DM, Lee JS. Influence of T3 or T4 sympathectomy for palmar hyperhidrosis. Am J Surg. 2010;199:166–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ishy A, Ribas Milanez De Campos J, Wolosker N, Kauffman P, Tedde ML, Chiavoni CR, et al. Objective evaluation of patients with palmar hyperhidrosis submitted to two levels of sympathectomy: T3 and T4. Interact CardioVasc Thorac Surg. 2011;12:545–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Fiorelli A, D’Aponte A, Canonico R, Palladino A, Vicidomini G, Limongelli F, et al. T2–T3 sympathectomy versus sympathectomy for essential palmar hyperhidrosis: comparison of effects on cardio-respiratory function. Eur J Cardio Thorac Surg. 2012;42:454–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Joo S, Lee GD, Haam S, Lee S. Comparisons of the clinical outcomes of thoracoscopic sympathetic surgery for palmar hyperhidrosis: R4 sympathectomy versus R4 sympathetic clipping versus R3 sympathetic clipping. J Thorac Dis. 2016;8:934–41.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Yanagihara TK, Ibrahimiye A, Harris C, Hirsch J, Gorenstein LA. Analysis of clamping versus cutting of T3 sympathetic nerve for severe palmar hyperhidrosis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2010;140:984–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Dharmaraj B, Kosai NR, Gendeh H, Ramzisham AR, Das S. A prospective cohort study on quality of life after endoscopic thoracic sympathectomy for primary hyperhidrosis. Clin Ter. 2016;167:67–71.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Wolosker N, De Campos JRM, Kauffman P, De Oliveira LA, Munia MAS, Jatene FB. Evaluation of quality of life over time among 453 patients with hyperhidrosis submitted to endoscopic thoracic sympathectomy. J Vasc Surg. 2012;55:154–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Menna C, Ibrahim M, Andreetti C, Ciccone AM, D’Andrilli A, Maurizi G, et al. Long term compensatory sweating results after sympathectomy for palmar and axillary hyperhidrosis. Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2016;5:26–32.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Japanese Association for Thoracic Surgery 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Thoracic SurgeryYedikule Chest Diseases and Thoracic Surgery Training and Research HospitalIstanbulTurkey
  2. 2.Department of Thoracic Surgery, Faculty Istinye Medical SchoolLiv Hospital UlusIstanbulTurkey

Personalised recommendations