Advertisement

New insight into tricuspid valve anatomy from 100 hearts to reappraise annuloplasty methodology

  • Yoshito SakonEmail author
  • Takashi Murakami
  • Hiromichi Fujii
  • Yosuke Takahashi
  • Akimasa Morisaki
  • Kokoro Yamane
  • Masahiko Ohsawa
  • Ayumi Shintani
  • Toshiko Seki
  • Toshihiko Shibata
Original Article
  • 179 Downloads

Abstract

Objective

Prosthetic ring annuloplasty plays an important role in tricuspid valve repair. However, discussions regarding the appropriate suturing technique for rigid annuloplasty rings in patients with tricuspid valve anatomical variations are lacking. We aimed to clarify the diversity and pattern of tricuspid valve morphology.

Methods

We analyzed tricuspid valve morphology and measured leaflet dimensions in 100 autopsy hearts, which were classified into three groups based on the number of posterior leaflet scallops: single scallop (PLS1) (n = 52), two scallops (PLS2) (n = 42), and three scallops (PLS3) (n = 5). One heart without posterior leaflet was excluded from the statistical analysis. Demographic characteristics were compared between PLS1, PLS2, and PLS3. The linear trends of proportions of each leaflet between PLS1, PLS2, and PLS3 were assessed using linear regression analysis.

Results

Median proportion (interquartile range) of the posterior annular length out of the entire annular perimeter in PLS1, PLS2, and PLS3 was 26% (22–31%), 37% (33–40%), and 45% (42–49%), respectively. Linear regression analysis showed a significant increasing trend (p for trend < 0.001) of the posterior leaflet annulus proportion from PLS1 to PLS3. Accordingly, the anterior and septal annulus proportions significantly decreased from PLS1 to PLS3.

Conclusions

Approximately half of the tricuspid valve has multiple posterior leaflet scallops. The proportion of the posterior leaflet annular length to the tricuspid valve annulus perimeter increases as the number of posterior leaflet scallops increases. These morphologic variations will be fundamental for future discussion about the pathology of a dilated tricuspid valve and methodology of prosthetic ring annuloplasty.

Keywords

Tricuspid valve Leaflet number Tricuspid valve annuloplasty 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank Dr. Yuji Nakajima, professor in the Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology, Osaka City University Graduate School of Medicine, for his helpful assistance to establish the basis of morphological consideration. We would like to thank Editage (https://www.editage.jp) for English language editing.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

Yoshito Sakon has no conflict of interest; Takashi Murakami has no conflict of interest; Hiromichi Fujii has no conflict of interest; Yosuke Takahashi has no conflict of interest; Akimasa Morisaki has no conflict of interest; Kokoro Yamane has no conflict of interest; Masahiko Ohsawa has no conflict of interest; Ayumi Shintani has no conflict of interest; Toshiko Seki has no conflict of interest; Toshihiko Shibata has no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Calafiore AM, Gallina S, Iaco AL, Contini M, Bivona A, Gagliardi M, et al. Mitral valve surgery for functional mitral regurgitation: should moderate-or-more tricuspid regurgitation be treated? A propensity score analysis. Ann Thorac Surg. 2009;3:698–703.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Di Mauro M, Bivona A, Iaco AL, Contini M, Gagliardi M, Varone E, et al. Mitral valve surgery for functional mitral regurgitation: prognostic role of tricuspid regurgitation. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2009;35:635–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Benedetto U, Melina G, Angeloni E, Refice S, Roscitano A, Comito C, et al. Prophylactic tricuspid annuloplasty in patients with dilated tricuspid annulus undergoing mitral valve surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2012;143:632–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kim JB, Yoo DG, Kim GS, Song H, Jung SH, Choo SK, et al. Mild-to-moderate functional tricuspid regurgitation in patients undergoing valve replacement for rheumatic mitral disease: the influence of tricuspid valve repair on clinical and echocardiographic outcomes. Heart. 2012;98:24–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Fukunaga N, Okada Y, Konishi Y, Murashita T, Koyama T. Persistent tricuspid regurgitation after tricuspid annuloplasty during redo valve surgery affects late survival and valve-related events. Circ J. 2014;78:2696–703.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Silver MD, Lam JH, Ranganathan N, Wigle ED. Morphology of the human tricuspid valve. Circulation. 1971;43:333–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Victor S, Nayak VM. The tricuspid valve is bicuspid. J Heart Valve Dis. 1994;3:27–36.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kawada N, Naganuma H, Marumatsu K, Ishibashi-Ueda H, Bando K, Hashimoto K. Redefinition of tricuspid valve structures for successful ring annuloplasty. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2018;155:1511–9.e1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Dreyfus GD, Corbi PJ, Han KMJ, Bahrami T. Secondary tricuspid regurgitation or dilatation: which should be the criteria for surgical repair? Ann Thorac Surg. 2005;79:127–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kilic A, Saha-Chaudhuri P, Rankin JS, Conte JV. Trends and outcomes of tricuspid valve surgery in North America: an analysis of more than 50,000 patients from the Society of Thoracic Surgeons database. Ann Thorac Surg. 2013;96:1546–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Anderson RH, Becker AE. Cardiac Anatomy. An integrated text and colour atlas. London: Gower Medical Publishing Ltd.; 1980 (3.20–3.21 & 10.15–10.19).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Deloche A, Guerinon J, Fabiani JN, Morillo F, Caramanian M, Carpentier A, et al. Anatomical study of rheumatic tricuspid valve diseases: application to the study of various valvuloplasties [in French]. Ann Chir Thorac Cardiovasc. 1973;12:343–9.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Shibata T, Takahashi Y, Sakon Y, Morisaki A, Murakami T. Shoulder point fitting method as a new universal tricuspid annuloplasty. Ann Thorac Surg. 2018;106:e49–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Japanese Association for Thoracic Surgery 2019
corrected publication 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yoshito Sakon
    • 1
    Email author
  • Takashi Murakami
    • 1
  • Hiromichi Fujii
    • 1
  • Yosuke Takahashi
    • 1
  • Akimasa Morisaki
    • 1
  • Kokoro Yamane
    • 1
  • Masahiko Ohsawa
    • 2
  • Ayumi Shintani
    • 3
  • Toshiko Seki
    • 3
  • Toshihiko Shibata
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Cardiovascular SurgeryOsaka City University Graduate School of MedicineOsakaJapan
  2. 2.Department of Diagnostic PathologyOsaka City University Graduate School of MedicineOsakaJapan
  3. 3.Department of Medical StatisticsOsaka City University Graduate School of MedicineOsakaJapan

Personalised recommendations