Advertisement

Repeat surgical intervention after aortic repair for acute Stanford type A dissection

  • Tadashi Kitamura
  • Shinzo Torii
  • Kensuke Kobayashi
  • Yuki Tanaka
  • Akihiro Sasahara
  • Haruna Araki
  • Yuki Ohtomo
  • Rihito Horikoshi
  • Kagami Miyaji
Original Article
  • 69 Downloads

Abstract

Objective

This study aimed to evaluate the outcomes of repeat interventions on the aorta and aortic valve after surgery for acute Stanford type A aortic dissection.

Methods

The hospital records of patients who underwent repeat surgical intervention between April 2011 and March 2017 for late complications after acute type A aortic dissection repair were retrospectively reviewed.

Results

We identified 17 patients with mean age of 62 ± 8 years; 13 were men. The mean interval from the initial emergency aortic repair to the repeat intervention was 5.8 ± 5.4 years (range 133 days–16.6 years). Ten patients had dilatation or rupture of the residual type B aortic dissection; six of them had retrograde type A aortic dissection at the onset and did not undergo resection of the primary entry. Five patients had a pseudoaneurysm at the anastomosis; four of them were receiving anticoagulation medication. Three patients had aortic regurgitation; two of them were associated with the gelatin-resorcinol-formaldehyde glue that was used during the initial surgery. There was no early mortality after repeat intervention and no late death after a mean follow-up period of 3.3 ± 2.0 years.

Conclusions

Repeat surgical intervention on the aorta and aortic valve after repair of acute type A aortic dissection had favorable early and mid-term outcomes and was not associated with early or late death. Long-term follow-up with imaging and echocardiography was considered to be essential for early detection of residual type B dilatation, anastomotic pseudoaneurysm, and aortic regurgitation after initial aortic repair.

Keywords

Aortic dissection Aortic aneurysm Pseudoaneurysm Aortic regurgitation Reoperation 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank Dr. Masashi Akiya, Department of Pathology, Kitasato University School of Medicine, for his assistance in the interpretation of the pathological findings.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Rylski B, Hahn N, Beyersdorf F, Kondov S, Wolkewitz M, Blanke P, et al. Fate of the dissected aortic arch after ascending replacement in type A aortic dissection. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2017;51:1127–34.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Mohammadi S, Bonnet N, Leprince P, Kolsi M, Rama A, Pavie A, et al. Reoperation for false aneurysm of the ascending aorta after its prosthetic replacement: surgical strategy. Ann Thorac Surg. 2005;79:147–52.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kitamura T, Motomura N, Ohtsuka T, Shibata K, Takayama H, Kotsuka Y, et al. Aortopulmonary fistula in pseudoaneurysm after ascending aortic surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2003;126:904–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Tanaka Y, Kitamura T, Miyata Y, Miyaji K. Mitral valve necrosis after cardiac surgery using gelatin-resorcinol-formaldehyde glue. Ann Thorac Surg. 2017;103:e435–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Okita Y, Okada Y, Otsuji Y, Komeda M, Nakatani S, Matsuzaki M, et al. Guidelines for surgical and interventional treatment of valvular heart disease (JCS 2012). 2018. http://www.j-circ.or.jp/guideline/pdf/JCS2012_ookita_h.pdf. Accessed 22 Apr 2018.
  6. 6.
    Kitamura T, Torii S, Horai T, Sughimoto K, Irisawa Y, Hayashi H, et al. Outcomes of patients who declined surgery for acute Stanford type A aortic dissection with patent false lumen of the ascending aorta. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2017;25:47–51.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Yamane Y, Uchida N, Mochizuki S, Furukawa T, Yamada K. Early- and mid-term aortic remodelling after the frozen elephant trunk technique for retrograde type A acute aortic dissection using the new Japanese J Graft open stent graft. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2017;25:720–6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Iafrancesco M, Goebel N, Mascaro J, Franke UFW, Pacini D, Di Bartolomeo R, et al. International E-vita Open Registry Group. Aortic diameter remodelling after the frozen elephant trunk technique in aortic dissection: results from an international multicentre registry. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2017;52:310–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Roselli EE, Idrees JJ, Bakaeen FG, Tong MZ, Soltesz EG, Mick S, et al. Evolution of simplified frozen elephant trunk repair for acute DeBakey type I dissection: Midterm outcomes. Ann Thorac Surg. 2017.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2017.08.037.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Shimizu H, Hirahara N, Motomura N, Miyata H, Takamoto S. Current status of cardiovascular surgery in Japan, 2013 and 2014: a report based on the Japan Cardiovascular Surgery Database 5. Thoracic aortic surgery. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2017;65:671–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Larsen M, Trimarchi S, Patel HJ, Di Eusanio M, Greason KL, Peterson MD, et al. Extended versus limited arch replacement in acute Type A aortic dissection. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2017;52:1104–10.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Inoue Y, Matsuda H, Omura A, Seike Y, Uehara K, Sasaki H, et al. What is the optimal surgical strategy for Stanford Type A acute aortic dissection in patients with a patent false lumen at the descending aorta? [published online ahead of print March 28, 2018]. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2018.  https://doi.org/10.1093/ejcts/ezy125.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bingley JA, Gardner MA, Stafford EG, Mau TK, Pohlner PG, Tam RK, et al. Late complications of tissue glues in aortic surgery. Ann Thorac Surg. 2000;69:1764–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Suzuki S, Masuda M, Imoto K. The use of surgical glue in acute type A aortic dissection. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014;62:207–13.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Japanese Association for Thoracic Surgery 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Cardiovascular SurgeryKitasato University School of MedicineSagamiharaJapan

Personalised recommendations