The emotional review–reward effect: how do reviews increase impulsivity?
A growing reliance on customer reviews prompts firms to develop strategies to encourage customers to post online reviews of their products. However, little research investigates the behavioral consequences of writing a review. The act of sharing personal opinions through reviews is a rewarding experience and makes customers feel socially connected. With an application of reverse alliesthesia theory, the current study predicts that such rewarding experiences drive online reviewers to seek other rewards, such as impulsive buying. Three lab-based and two field studies demonstrate such an emotional review–reward effect: sharing emotional information in the public realm of customer reviews, rather than forming similar opinions privately, drives participants to make more impulsive buying decisions.
KeywordsReverse alliesthesia Impulsivity Reward Online reviews
The data collection and analysis was handled by the first and third authors. The authors appreciate the helpful comments of Tana Luger.
- Chatterjee, P. (2001). Online reviews: Do consumers use them? In M. C. Gilly & J. Meyers-Levy (Eds.), NA-Advances in Consumer Research (Vol. 28, pp. 129–133). Valdosta: Association for Consumer Research.Google Scholar
- Derlega, V. J., Metts, S., Petronio, S., & Margulis, S. T. (1993). Self-disclosure. Newbury Park: SAGE Publications, Inc..Google Scholar
- Garson, G. D. (2012). Hierarchical linear modeling: Guide and applications. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications, Inc..Google Scholar
- Hellmich, N. (2014), “Put Down the Shiny Object! Most Have Made Impulse Buys,” USA Today, (November 26), [available at http://www.usatoday.com/story/money/personalfinance/2014/11/24/impulse-purchases-holiday-shopping/19477369/].
- Karmali, N. (2007). “Meet Coke’s next boss”? An interview with Muhtar Kent, CEO–coca Cola, business India, Dec 18.Google Scholar
- Kelly, L. (2007). Beyond buzz: The next generation of word-of-mouth marketing. AMACOM Division American Management Association.Google Scholar
- Mills, R. S., & Grusec, J. E. (1989). Cognitive, affective, and behavioral consequences of praising altruism. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 35(3), 299–326.Google Scholar
- Nielson (2012). State of the media: The social media report. Retrieved on November 27, 2014 from http://www.nielsen.com/us/en/insights/reports/2012/state-of-the-media-the-social-media-report-2012.html.
- Ordenes, F., Ludwig, S., De Ruyter, K., Grewal, D., & Wetzels, M. (2017). Unveiling what is written in the stars: Analyzing explicit, implicit, and discourse patterns of sentiment in social media. Journal of Consumer Research, 43(6), 875–894.Google Scholar
- Pennebaker Conglomerates, Inc. (n.d.). In LIWC: Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count. Retrieved April 23, 2014 from http://www.liwc.net/index.php.
- Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (Vol. 1). Newbury Park: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
- Weber Shandwick (2013). Buy it, try it, rate it. Retrieved on January 27, 2015 from http://www.webershandwick.com/news/article/buy-it-try-it-rate-it-the-power-of-consumer-reviews.
- Stampler, L. (2014). Instagrammers post 216,000 new pics a minute and other crazy Internet data facts, Time Magazine, April 23. Retrieved on May 18, 2015 from http://time.com/73581/data-generated-online-every-minute-domo.
- Streitfeld, D. (2012). For $2 a star, an online retailer gets 5-star product reviews. New York Times, 26.Google Scholar
- The New York Times (2011). The psychology of sharing. Retrieved on August 18, 2014 from http://nytmarketing.whsites.net/mediakit/pos.
- Vohs, K. D., & Schmeichel, B. J. (2007). Self-regulation: How and why people reach (and fail to reach) their goals. In C. Sedikides & S. J. Spencer (Eds.), Frontiers in Social Psychology: The Self (pp. 139–162). New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar