Advertisement

Production Engineering

, Volume 12, Issue 6, pp 797–806 | Cite as

Improvement of surface quality of 1.6220 cast steel by calibrating process and effects on material behavior

  • Florian Hofbauer
  • Andreas Schirmeyer
  • Wolfram Volk
Production Process
  • 17 Downloads

Abstract

There is a growing demand for thin walled steel casting structural parts especially in the automotive industry. Therefore an economic casting process is needed, that provides high surface quality. Requirements of spot weldability and corrosion protection need to be met, which is not possible with high surface roughness. Therefore a calibrating step is introduced aimed at reducing the surface roughness of the sand cast steel samples. Besides surface quality, also changes in geometrical dimensions and mechanical properties are investigated. Calibrating was carried out as planar forging on a forging device. This combined process of casting and forging did lead to a significant reduction of the roughness values, but this effect could only be observed in the edge area of the investigated sample plates. Furthermore a deformation of material in thickness direction and flow of material in width direction was noted. A relationship between deformation in thickness direction and straightening was detected. Another one between material flow and reduction of roughness values. Tensile tests and impact tests revealed a more brittle behavior of the material in calibrated state. Also the influence of wall thickness and heat treatment was investigated. Whereas wall thickness (as the local amount of material) mainly determines deformability and in consequence the straightening effect, heat treatment increases the ability of the material to flow, which contributes to the reduction of surface roughness. The inhomogeneity of the surface effect in combination with an extraordinary high required force remain as the main issue in trying to achieve a uniform surface quality improvement by calibrating process.

Keywords

Calibrating Steel casting Surface quality Mechanical properties 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This publication is based on the Bachelor’s Thesis of second named author Andreas Schirmeyer, which was carried out under the mentorship of first named author Florian Hofbauer. This unpublished work Vergleichende Charakterisierung der Oberfläche und Eigenschaften von kalibriertem dünnwandigem Stahlguss was completed in March 2018 at the Landshut University of Applied Sciences, Mechanical Engineering Department.

References

  1. 1.
    Jiang J, Wang Y, Li Y, Qu J, Shan W, Luo S (2012) A double control forming technology combining die casting and forging for the production of Mg alloy components with enhanced properties. J Mater Process Technol 212:1191–1199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Jiang J, Wang Y, Li Y, Shan W, Luo S (2012) Microstructure and mechanical properties of the motorcycle cylinder body of AM60B magnesium alloy formed by combining die casting and forging. Mater Des 37:202–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Zhang Q, Cao M, Zhang D, Zhang S, Sun J (2014) Research on integrated casting and forging process of aluminum automobile wheel. Adv Mech Eng.  https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/870182 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Zhou HT, Xu SX, Li WD, Wang SC, Peng Y (2015) A study of automobile brake bracket formed by casting-forging integrated forming technology. Mater Des 67:285–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kim HR, Seo MG, Bae WB (2002) A study of the manufacturing of tie-rod ends with casting/forging process. J Mater Process Technol 125–126:471–476CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dedov S, Lehmann G, Kawalla R (2013) Application of combined casting-forging process for production of durable lightweight aluminum parts. Key Eng Mater 554–557:264–273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Di Serio T (1987) Procédé pour fabriquer des pièces en aluminium ou en alliage d’alluminium. EP 0 119 365 B1Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bouvier V, Gendre B (2007) The COBAPRESS(TM) process: a process rich of a twenty five years experience, with a bright future. Hommes Fonderie 378:10–16Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Flemings MC, Boylan JF, Bye RL (1978) Thixocasting Steel Parts. Final technical report: contract number DAAG-46-77-C-0033. Massachusetts Institute of TechnologyGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Püttgen W, Bleck W, Hirt G, Shimahara H (2007) Thixoforming of steels—a status report. Adv Eng Mater 9(4):231–245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hirt G, Bleck W, Bührig-Polaczek A, Shimahara H, Püttgen W, Afrath C (2006) Semi solid casting and forging of steel. Solid State Phenom 116–117:34–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Balan T, Becker E, Langlois L, Bigot R (2017) A new route for semi-solid steel forging. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 66:297–300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Siegert K, Messmer G (2004) Thixoforging of steel alloys—facility requirements for industrial application. Steel Res Int 75(8/9):601–606CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Küthe F, Schönbohm A, Abel D, Kopp R (2004) An automated thixo-forging plant for steel parts. Steel Res Int 75(8/9):593–600CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Werke M, Gotte A, Sibeck L (2014) CastForging for production of components with tailored geometry and strength. Fordonsstrategisk Forskning och Innovation FFI, StockholmGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Li H (2012) A study of surface roughness in the metal forming process. Dissertation, University of WollongongGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kimura Y, Childs THC (1999) Surface asperity deformation under bulk plastic straining conditions. Int J Mech Sci 41:283–307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Sutcliffe MPF (1988) Surface asperity deformation in metal forming processes. Int J Mech Sci 30:847–868CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ike H (1995) Plastic deformation of surface asperities associated with bulk deformation of metal workpiece in contact with rigid tool. In: Raous M et al (eds) Contact mechanics. Plenum Press, New York, pp 275–286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Korzekwa DA, Dawson PR, Wilson WRD (1992) Surface asperity deformation during sheet forming. Int J Mech Sci 34:521–539CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Nielsen CV, Bay N (2017) Overview of friction modelling in metal forming processes. Procedia Eng 207:2257–2262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Behrens BA (2012) Gesenkschmieden. In: Hofmann H, Neugebauer R, Spur G (eds) Handbuch Umformen. Carl Hanser, Munich, pp 244–309Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Martín F, Martín MJ, Sevilla L, Sebastián MA (2015) The ring compression test: analysis of dimensions and canonical geometry. Procedia Eng 132:326–333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    International Standard ISO 4288 (1996-08-01) Geometrical Product Specifications (GPS)—Surface texture: Profile method—rules and procedures for the assessment of surface texture. International Organization for Standardization, GenèveGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Deutsche Norm DIN 50125 (2016-12) Prüfung metallischer Werkstoffe—Zugproben. Deutsches Institut für Normung, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    International Standard ISO 148-1 (2016-10-15) Metallic materials—Charpy pendulum impact test—Part 1: Test method. International Organization for Standardization, GenèveGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© German Academic Society for Production Engineering (WGP) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Florian Hofbauer
    • 1
  • Andreas Schirmeyer
    • 2
  • Wolfram Volk
    • 3
  1. 1.BMW GroupMunichGermany
  2. 2.Fakultät MaschinenbauFachhochschule LandshutLandshutGermany
  3. 3.Lehrstuhl für Umformtechnik und GießereiwesenTechnische Universität MünchenMunichGermany

Personalised recommendations