Advertisement

Production Engineering

, Volume 13, Issue 1, pp 11–19 | Cite as

Analysis of potentials to improve the machining of hybrid workpieces

  • Berend Denkena
  • Benjamin Bergmann
  • Bernd Breidenstein
  • Vannila Prasanthan
  • Matthias WittEmail author
Machine Tool
  • 58 Downloads

Abstract

Hybrid workpieces made of different materials are part of current research to investigate new design concepts for high-performance components. Cutting conditions and chip formation mechanisms change during machining based on different material properties and chemical compositions. This leads to different residual stresses in the subsurface, which influence the service life of the component. This paper examines the potential of improving workpiece quality and processing productivity of hybrid workpieces by material-specific machining. Furthermore, residual stress gradients in the transition zone were determined in order to analyze in further investigations its influence on the service behavior. The passive forces have a major influence on the residual stresses. By means of process parameter adaptation, the process forces can thus be specifically influenced and consequently the gradient in the material transition zone can be set therefore in a defined manner. For this purposes, the difference in process force during longitudinal turning of an aluminum–steel compound (EN-AW6082/20MnCr5) and a steel–steel compound (C22.8/41Cr4) was investigated. The resulting geometry errors, profile height deviation and surface roughness variance were measured for a wide parameter range and the residual stresses were compared for both material compounds. The optimization of the machining time through material-specific adaptation of the process parameters was calculated for six workpieces. The study shows the potential to reduce geometry errors and shorten the machining time for hybrid workpieces, if the process parameters are adapted to current machined material.

Keywords

Turning Optimization Hybrid parts Residual stress 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The results presented in this paper were obtained within the Collaborative Research Centre 1153 “Process chain to produce hybrid high performance components by Tailored Forming” in the subprojects B4 and B5. The authors would like to thank the German Research Foundation (DFG) for the financial and organisational support of this project.

References

  1. 1.
    Goede M, Stehlin M, Rafflenbeul L, Kopp G, Beeh E (2009) Super Light Car-lightweight construction thanks to a multi-material design and function integration. Eur Transp Res Rev 1(1):5–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Fiebig S, Sellschopp J, Manz H, Vietor T, Axmann K, Schumacher A (2015) Future challenges for topology optimization for the usage in automotive lightweight design technologies. In: Proceedings of 11th world congress on structural and multidisciplinary optimization, Sydney, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Behrens BA, Bouguecha A, Frischkorn C, Huskic A, Stakhieva A, Duran D (2016) Tailored forming technology for three dimensional components: approaches to heating and forming. In: 5th conference on thermomechanical processing, Milan, Italy, October 26th–28thGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Behrens BA, Bouguecha A, Vucetic M, Peshekhodov I, Matthias T, Kolbasnikov N, Sokolov S, Ganin S (2016) Experimental investigations on the state of the friction-welded joint zone in steel hybrid components after process-relevant thermo-mechanical. In: AIP Conference Proceeding, vol 1769Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Blohm T, Mildebrath M, Stonis M, Langner J, Hassel T, Behrens BA (2017) Investigation of the coating thickness of plasma-transferred arc deposition welded and cross wedge rolled hybrid parts. Prod Eng Res Dev 11(3):244–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Goldstein R, Behrens BA, Duran D (2017) Lightweighting by tailored forming: bi-material stepped shaft. In: Heat treat 2017, proceedings of the 29th ASM heat treating society conference, October 24–26, Columbus, Ohio, USAGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Boehnke D (2007) Qualitätsorientierte Zerspanung von Parallelverbunden im kontinuierlichen Schnitt. Dissertation, Leibniz Universität HannoverGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kramer N (2007) In-process identification of material-properties by acoustic emission signals. Ann CIRP 56(1):331–334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Klocke F, König W (2008) Fertigungsverfahren 1. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    El-Khabeery MM, Fattouh M (1989) Residual stress distribution caused by milling. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 29(3):391–401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Pape F, Neubauer T, Maiß O, Denkena B, Poll G (2017) Influence of residual stresses introduced by manufacturing processes on bearing endurance time. Tribol Lett 65(2):70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Denkena B, Bergmann B, Witt M (2017) Automatic process parameter adaption for hybrid workpieces during cylindrical operations. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 95(1–4):311–316Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Breidenstein B, Denkena B, Mörke T, Prasanthan V (2017) Non-destructive determination of residual stress depth profiles of hybrid components by energy dispersive residual stress measurement. Key Eng Mater 742:613–620CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Brinksmeier E, Cammet JT, König W, Leskovar P, Peters J, Tönshoff HK (1982) Residual stress—measurement and causes in machining processes. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 31:491–510CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ninh Nguyen T, Wahab MA (1998) The effect of weld geometry and residual stresses on the fatigue of welded joints under combined loading. J Mat Processing Tech 77:201–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© German Academic Society for Production Engineering (WGP) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Berend Denkena
    • 1
  • Benjamin Bergmann
    • 1
  • Bernd Breidenstein
    • 1
  • Vannila Prasanthan
    • 1
  • Matthias Witt
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Institute of Production Engineering and Machine ToolsLeibniz Universität HannoverHanoverGermany

Personalised recommendations