One more option in heart failure: correction of mitral regurgitation with MitraClip®

  • Tommaso BiniEmail author
  • Cecilia Agostini
  • Miroslava Stolcova
  • Francesco Meucci
  • Carlo Di Mario


Degenerative mitral regurgitation in elderly patients and functional mitral regurgitation secondary to severe left ventricular dysfunction are not easy options for conventional surgery. Recently, a new percutaneous approach has been proposed with the MitraClip®, based on the Alfieri edge-to-edge repair technique. The aim of the study is to report, compare and discuss the results of two multicenter randomized trials: MITRA.FR and COAPT in light of the current practice. In both trials patients with functional mitral regurgitation grade 3/4+ or 4/4+ were randomly assigned, in 1:1 ratio, to undergo percutaneous repair and optimal medical therapy or optimal medical therapy alone. Other baseline characteristics reflecting severity of mitral regurgitation and of left ventricular impairment were statistically different, such as the effective regurgitant orifice area (0.31 cm2 in MITRA.FR vs 0.41 cm2 in COAPT) and the indexed LVEDV (135 ± 37 ml/m2 in MITRA.FR vs 101 ± 34 ml/m2 in COAPT). A 24 months follow-up and a 12 months follow-up have been completed, respectively, in COAPT and MITRA.FR. Out of the 307 patients enrolled in the MITRA.FR, 152 were randomized to percutaneous treatment but only in 138 (95.8%) the MitraClip® was actually implanted. At the end of the follow-up a residual mitral regurgitation of at least grade 3+ has been observed in 17% of the patients. A composite of death from any cause or unplanned hospitalizations for heart failure at 12 months respectively occurred in 83 patients (54.6%) treated percutaneously and 78 patients (51.3%) treated with medical therapy only. A total of 614 patients have been enrolled in the COAPT and 293 underwent transcatheter treatment. A successful implantation of the MitraClip® was achieved in 287 patients (98.0%). Hospitalization for heart failure at 24 months occurred in 160 patients in the device group and in 283 in the control group, with an annualized ratio of 35.8% and 67.9%, respectively (p > 0.001). The conflicting results of the two trials may have many explanations, but probably the main cause is the most stringent inclusion criteria in COAPT. The effective reduction of mitral regurgitation and improvement in exercise capacity already observed in registries including more than 70,000 patients was confirmed in a randomized trial with improvement observed in hard end-points. This has already led to an extension of FDA approval to functional regurgitation and a more liberal use across the world.


Mitral valve Mitral regurgitation MitraClip 


Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

Author B is member of a committee involved in the evaluation and the purchase of technical material for MitraClip® percutaneous implantation. The other authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Statement of human and animal rights

All procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2000 (5).

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all patients for being included in the study.


  1. 1.
    Nkomo VT, Gardin JM, Skelton TN, Gottdiener JS, Scott CG, Enriquez-Sarano M (2006) Burden of valvular heart diseases: a population-based study. Lancet 368:1005–1011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Chen T, Ferrari VA, Silvestry FE (2018) Identification and quantification of degenerative and functional mitral regurgitation for patient selection for transcatheter mitral valve repair. Interv Cardiol Clin 7:387–404Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Maisano F, Franzen O, Baldus S, Schäfer U, Hausleiter J, Butter C, Ussia GP, Sievert H, Richardt G, Widder JD, Moccetti T, Schillinger W (2013) Percutaneous mitral valve interventions in the real world. Early and 1-year results from the ACCESS-EU, a prospective, multicenter, nonrandomized post-approval study of the MitraClip therapy in Europe. J Am Coll Cardiol 62:1052–1061CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Surder D, Pedrazzini G, Gaemperli O, Biaggi P, FelixC Rufibach K, der Maur CA, Jeger R, Buser P, Kaufmann BA, Mocetti M, Hürlimann D, Bühler I, Bettex D, Scherman J, Pasotti E, Faletra FF, Zuber M, Mocetti T, Lüscher TF, Erne P, Grünenfelder J, Conti R (2013) Predictors for efficacy of percutaneous mitral valve repair using the MitraClip system: the results of the MitraSwiss registry. Heart 99:1034–1040CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Yeo KK, Yap J, Yamen E, Muda N, Tay E, Walters DL, Santoso T, Liu X, Jansz P, Yip J, Passage J, Koh TH, Wang J, Scalia G, Kuntioro I, Soesanto AM, Muller D (2014) Percutaneous mitral valve repair with MitraClip: early results from the MitraClip Asia–Pacific Registry (MARS). Eurointervention 10:620–625CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Feldman T, Foster E, Glower DD, Kar S, Rinaldi MJ, Fail PS, Smalling RW, Siegel R, Rose GA, Engeron E, Loghin C, Trento A, Skipper ER, Fudge T, Letsou GV, Massaro JM, Mauri L, for the EVEREST II Investigators (2011) Percutaneous repair or surgery for mitral regurgitation. N Engl J Med 364:1395–1406CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Feldman T, Kar S, Elmariah A, Smart SC, Trento A, Siegel RJ, Apruzzese P, Fail P, Rinaldi MJ, Smalling RW, Hermiller JB, Heimansohn D, Gray WA, Grayburn PA, Mack MJ, Lim S, Ailawadi G, Herrmann HC, Acker MA, Silvestry FE, Foster E, Wang A, Glower DD, Mauri L, for the EVEREST II Investigators (2015) Randomized comparison of percutaneous repair and surgery for mitral regurgitation. J Am Coll Cardiol 66:2844–2854CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ledwoch J, Mati P, Franke J, Gafoor S, Bertog S, Reinarzt M, Vaskelyte L, Hofmann I, Sievert H (2016) Transcatheter mitral valve repair with the MitraClip can be performed without general anesthesia and without conscious sedation. Clin Res Cardiol 105(4):297–306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    de Waha S, Seenburger J, Ender J, Desch S, Eitel I, Reinhardt A, Pöss J, Fuernau G, Noack T, Merk DR, Schuler G, Sievers HH, Mohr FW, Thiele H (2016) Deep sedation versus general anesthesia in percutaneous edge-to-edge mitral valve reconstruction using MitraClip system. Clin Res Cardiol 105(6):535–543CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Puls M, Lubos E, Boekstegers P, von Bardeleben RS, Ourrak T, Butter C, Zuern CS, Bekeredjian R, Sievert H, Nickenig G, Eggebrecht H, Senges J, Schillinger W (2016) One-year outcomes and predictors of mortality after MitraClip therapy in contemporary clinical practice: results from the German transcatheter mitral valve interventions registry. Eur Heart J 37(8):703–712CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Nishimura RA, Otto CM, Bonow RO, Carabello BA, Erwinlll JP, Fleisher LA, Jneid H, Mack MJ, Mcleod CJ, O'Gara PT, Rigolin VH, Sundtlll TM, Thompson A (2017) AHA/ACC focused update of the 2014 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of patients with valvular heart disease. JACC 70:252–289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Nickenig G, Estevez-Loureiro R, Franzen O, Tamburino C, Vanderheyden M, Lüscher TF, Moat N, Price S, Dall'Ara G, Winter R, Corti R, Grasso C, Snow TM, Jeger R, Blankenberg S, Settergren M, Tiroch K, Balzer J, Petronio AS, Büttner HJ, Ettori F, Sievert H, Fiorino MG, Claeys M, Ussia GP, Baumgartner H, Scandura S, Alamgir F, Keshavarzi F, Colombo A, Maisano F, Ebelt H, Aruta P, Lubos E, Plicht B, Schueler R, Pighi M, Di Mario C (2014) Percutaneous mitral valve edge-to-edge repair: in-hospital results and 1-year follow-up of 628 patients of the 2011–2012 Pilot European Sentinel Registry. J Am Coll Cardiol. 64(9):875–884CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Baumgartner H, Falk V, Bax JJ, De Bonis M, Hamm C, Holm PJ, Iung B, Lancellotti P, Lansac E, Muñoz DR, Rosenhek R, Sjögren J, Mas PT, Vahanian A, Walther T, Wendler O, Windecker S, Zamorano JL (2017) 2017 ESC/EACTS guidelines for the management of valvular heart disease. Eur Heart J 38:2739–2791CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Obadia JF, Messika-Zeitoun D, Leurent G, Iung B, Bonnet G, Piriou N, Lefèvre T, Piot C, Rouleau F, Carrié D, Nejjari M, Ohlmann P, Leclercq F, Saint Etienne C, Teiger E, Leroux L, Karam N, Michel N, Gilard M, Donal E, Trochu JN, Cormier B, Armoiry X, Boutitie F, Maucort-Boulch D, Barnel C, Samson G, Guerin P, Vasanian A, Mewton N, for the MITRA-FR Investigators (2018) Percutaneous repair or medical treatment for secondary mitral regurgitation. N Engl J Med 379:2297–2306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Stone GW, Lindenfeld JA, Abraham WT, Kar S, Lim DS, Mishell JM, Whisenant B, Grayburn PA, Rinaldi M, Kapadia SR, Rajagopal V, Harembock IJ, Brieke A, Marx SO, Cohen DJ, Weissman NJ, Mack MJ, for the COAPT Investigators (2018) Transcatheter mitral-valve repair in patients with heart failure. N Engl J Med 379:2307–2318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Whitlow PL, Feldman T, Pedersen WR, Lim DS, Kipperman R, Smalling R, Bajwa T, Herrmann HC, Lasala J, Maddux JT, Tuzcu M, Kapadia S, Trento A, Siegel RJ, Foster E, Glower D, Mauri L, Kar S, on behalf of the EVEREST II Investigators (2012) Acute and 12-month results with catheter-based mitral valve leaflet repair. The EVEREST II (Endovascular Valve Edge-to-Edge Repair) high risk study. J Am Coll Cardiol 59:130–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Nishimura RA, Bonow RO (2018) Percutaneous repair of secondary mitral regurgitation. A tale of two trials. N Engl J Med 379:24CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Società Italiana di Medicina Interna (SIMI) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tommaso Bini
    • 1
    Email author
  • Cecilia Agostini
    • 1
  • Miroslava Stolcova
    • 1
  • Francesco Meucci
    • 1
  • Carlo Di Mario
    • 1
  1. 1.Structural Interventional Cardiology, Department of Clinical and Experimental MedicineUniversity Hospital CareggiFlorenceItaly

Personalised recommendations