Central venous oxygen saturation is not predictive of early complications in cancer patients presenting to the emergency department
- 36 Downloads
Central venous oxygen saturation (ScvO2) is easily observable in oncology patients with long-term central venous catheters (CVC), and has been studied as a prognostic factor in patients with sepsis. We sought to investigate the association between ScvO2 and early complications in cancer patients presenting to the ED. We prospectively enrolled adult cancer patients with pre-existing CVC who presented to the ED. ScvO2 was measured on their CVC. The outcome was admission to the intensive care unit (ICU) or mortality by day 7. ScvO2 was first studied as a continuous variable (%) with a ROC analysis and as a categorical variable (cut-off at < 70%) with a multivariate analysis. A total of 210 cancer patients were enrolled. At baseline, ScvO2 showed no significant difference between patients who were admitted to the ICU or died before day 7, and patients who did not (67%; IQR 62–68% vs. 71%; IQR 65–78% respectively, P = 0.3). The ROC analysis showed the absence of discrimination accuracy for ScvO2 to predict the outcome (AUC = 0.56). By multivariate analysis, ScvO2 < 70% was not associated with the outcome (OR 1.67; 95% CI 0.64–4.36). Variables that were associated with ICU admission or death by day 7 included a shock-index (heart rate/systolic blood pressure) > 1 and a performance status > 2 (OR 4.76; 95% CI 1.81–12.52 and OR 6.23, 95% CI 2.40–16.17, respectively). This study does not support the use of ScvO2 to risk stratify cancer patients presenting to the ED.
KeywordsCentral venous oxygen saturation (ScvO2) Emergency department Cancer Triage Neutropenia
OP, GD, JPF and EA made the study concept and design; OP, LL, AP, JF, MS, AV, JA, HM, AB, AG acquired the data; OP analyzed and interpreted the data; OP, JPF and EA drafted the manuscript; LL, AP, JF, MS, AV, JA, HM, AB, AG, MRR, JPF and EA made critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content; MRR gave statistical expertise.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Statement of human and animal rights
The study was approved by the regional Ethics Committee.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in this study.
- 8.Angus DC, Barnato AE, Bell D, Bellomo R, Chong CR, Coats TJ, Davies A, Delaney A, Harrison DA, Holdgate A, Howe B, Huang DT, Iwashyna T, Kellum JA, Peake SL, Pike F, Reade MC, Rowan KM, Singer M, Webb SA, Weissfeld LA, Yealy DM, Young JD (2015) A systematic review and meta-analysis of early goal-directed therapy for septic shock: the ARISE, ProCESS and ProMISe Investigators. Intensive Care Med 41:1549–1560CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 9.Boulain T, Garot D, Vignon P, Lascarrou JB, Desachy A, Botoc V, Follin A, Frat JP, Bellec F, Quenot JP, Mathonnet A, Dequin PF (2014) Clinical Research in Intensive Care and Sepsis Group: prevalence of low central venous oxygen saturation in the first hours of intensive care unit admission and associated mortality in septic shock patients: a prospective multicentre study. Crit Care 18:609CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 10.Pope JV, Jones AE, Gaieski DF, Arnold RC, Trzeciak S, Shapiro NI (2010) Emergency Medicine Shock Research Network (EMShockNet) Investigators: multicenter study of central venous oxygen saturation (ScvO2) as a predictor of mortality in patients with sepsis. Ann Emerg Med 55:40–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 11.Mazzone A, Dentali F, La Regina M, Foglia E, Gambacorta M, Garagiola E, Bonardi G, Clerici P, Concia E, Colombo F, Campanini M (2016) Clinical features, short-term mortality, and prognostic risk factors of septic patients admitted to internal medicine units: results of an Italian Multicenter Prospective Study. Medicine 95:e2124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 13.Seymour CW, Liu VX, Iwashyna TJ, Brunkhorst FM, Rea TD, Scherag A, Rubenfeld G, Kahn JM, Shankar-Hari M, Singer M, Deutschman CS, Escobar GJ, Angus DC (2016) Assessment of clinical criteria for sepsis: for the third international consensus definitions for sepsis and septic shock (Sepsis-3). JAMA 315:762–774CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 15.Freund Y, Lemachatti N, Krastinova E, Van Laer M, Claessens YE, Avondo A, Occelli C, Feral-Pierssens AL, Truchot J, Ortega M, Carneiro B, Pernet J, Claret PG, Dami F, Bloom B, Riou B, Beaune S, French Society of Emergency Medicine Collaborators Group (2017) Prognostic accuracy of Sepsis-3 criteria for in-hospital mortality among patients with suspected infection presenting to the emergency department. JAMA 317:301–308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 20.Rodriguez RM, Greenwood JC, Nuckton TJ, Darger B, Shofer FS, Troeger D, Jung SY, Speich KG, Valencia J, Kilgannon JH, Fernandez D, Baumann BM (2018) Comparison of qSOFA with current emergency department tools for screening of patients with sepsis for critical illness. Emerg Med J 35(6):350–356. https://doi.org/10.1136/emermed-2017-207383 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 30.Mato AR, Luger SM, Heitjan DF, Mikkelsen ME, Olson E, Ujjani C, Jacobs S, Miltiades AN, Shah P, Schuster SJ, Carroll M, Chauffe AD, Fuchs BD (2010) Elevation in serum lactate at the time of febrile neutropenia (FN) in hemodynamically-stable patients with hematologic malignancies (HM) is associated with the development of septic shock within 48 hours. Cancer Biol Ther 9:585–589CrossRefGoogle Scholar