Advertisement

Internal and Emergency Medicine

, Volume 13, Issue 7, pp 1015–1018 | Cite as

Has time come for the use of direct oral anticoagulants in the extended prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism in acutely ill medical patients? No

  • Francesco Marongiu
  • Doris Barcellona
DEBATE

Abstract

Acutely ill hospitalized medical patients are at high risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE). Although thromboprophylaxis in these patients is recommended since 2004 by the American College of Chest Physicians, it is widely underused. The doubt as to whether or not to treat patients at high VTE risk after hospital discharge came from the knowledge that this risk may persist after the hospital admission period. Two meta-analyses comparing extended- versus short-duration prophylaxis are published. The results demonstrate an unfavorable balance between VTE prevention and incidence of major bleeding in patients assigned to extended-duration thromboprophylaxis. Only in the APEX study, betrixaban, a direct inhibitor of factor Xa, shows similar efficacy and safety compared to enoxaparin. However, while it is very promising, oral anticoagulant phase III studies and post-marketing registers are lacking. Moreover, betrixaban has a long half-life, an excretion in the gut by means of P-glycoprotein, and the lack of an antidote. These characteristics and the meta-analysis results prompt us to answer no to the extended thromboprophylaxis in hospitalized medical patients, at least now.

Keywords

Direct oral anticoagulants Venous thromboembolism Extended thromboprophylaxis 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Statement of human and animal rights

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was not required for this type of study.

References

  1. 1.
    Nichols L, Chew B (2012) Causes of sudden unexpected death of adult hospital patients. J Hosp Med 7:706–708CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Francis CW (2007) Clinical practice. Prophylaxis for thromboembolism in hospitalized medical patients. N Engl J Med 356:1438–1444CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Samama MM, Cohen AT, Darmon JY et al (1999) A comparison of enoxaparin with placebo for the prevention of venous thromboembolism in acutely ill medical patients. Prophylaxis in Medical Patients with Enoxaparin Study Group. N Engl J Med 341:793–800CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Leizorovicz A, Cohen AT, Turpie AG et al (2004) Randomized, placebo-controlled trial of dalteparin for the prevention of venous thromboembolism in acutely ill medical patients. Circulation 110:874–879CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cohen AT, Davidson BL, Gallus AS et al (2006) Efficacy and safety of fondaparinux for the prevention of venous thromboembolism in older acute medical patients: randomised placebo controlled trial. Br Med J 332:325–329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Geerts WH, Pineo GF, Heit JA et al (2004) Prevention of venous thromboembolism: the seventh ACCP conference on antithrombotic and thrombolytic therapy. Chest 126(3 Suppl):338S–400SCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bergmann JF, Cohen AT, Tapson VF, ENDORSE Investigators et al (2010) Venous thromboembolism risk and prophylaxis in hospitalized medically ill patients. The ENDORSE Global Survey. Thromb Haemost 103:736–748CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kahn SR, Lim W, Dunn AS et al (2012) Prevention of VTE in nonsurgical patients: antithrombotic therapy and prevention of thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines. Chest 141(2 Suppl):e195S–e226SCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Barbar S, Noventa F, Rossetto V et al (2010) A risk assessment model for the identification of hospitalized medical patients at risk for venous thromboembolism: the Padua Prediction Score. J Thromb Haemost 8:2450–2457CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Nendaz M, Spirk D, Kucher N et al (2014) Multicentre validation of the Geneva Risk Score for hospitalized medical patients at risk of venous thromboembolism Explicit ASsessment of Thromboembolic RIsk and Prophylaxis for Medical PATients in SwitzErland (ESTIMATE). Thromb Haemost 111:531–538CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Rafizadeh R, Ricky D, Turgeon RD et al (2016) Characterization of venous thromboembolism risk in medical inpatients using different clinical risk assessment models. Can J Hosp Pharm 69:454–459PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ruberto MF, Marongiu F, Mandas A et al (2018) The venous thromboembolic risk and the clot wave analysis: a useful relationship? Clin Chem Lab Med 56:448–453CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Amin AN, Varker H, Princic N et al (2012) Duration of venous thromboembolism risk across a continuum in medically ill hospitalized patients. J Hosp Med 7:231–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Dentali F, Mumoli N, Prisco D et al (2017) Efficacy and safety of extended thromboprophylaxis for medically ill patients A meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Thromb Haemost 117:606–617CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Liew AYL, Siavash Piran S, Eikelboom JW et al (2017) Extended-duration versus short-duration pharmacological thromboprophylaxis in acutely ill hospitalized medical patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Thromb Thrombolysis 43:291–301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hull RD, Schellong SM, Tapson VF et al (2010) Extended-duration venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in acutely ill medical patients with recently reduced mobility: a randomized trial. EXCLAIM (Extended Prophylaxis for Venous ThromboEmbolism in Acutely ill Medical Patients with Prolonged Immobilization) study. Ann Intern Med 153:8–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Goldhaber SZ, Leizorovicz A, Kakkar AK, ADOPT Trial Investigators et al (2011) Apixaban versus enoxaparin for thromboprophylaxis in medically ill patients. N Engl J Med 365:2167–2177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Cohen AT, Spiro TE, Buller HR et al (2013) Rivaroxaban for thromboprophylaxis in acutely ill medical patients. N Engl J Med 368:513–523CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Cohen AT, Harrington RA, Goldhaber SZ, APEX Investigators et al (2016) Extended thromboprophylaxis with betrixaban in acutely ill medical patients. N Engl J Med 375:534–544CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Chan NC, Bhagirath V, Eikelboom JW (2015) Profile of betrixaban and its potential in the prevention and treatment of venous thromboembolism. Vasc Health Risk Manag 11:343–351PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© SIMI 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Medical Sciences and Public HealthUniversity of CagliariCagliariItaly

Personalised recommendations