Efficiency of electronic signout for ED-to-inpatient admission at a non-teaching hospital
- 121 Downloads
Admission handoff is a high-risk component of patient care. Previous studies have shown that a standardized physician electronic signout (“eSignout”) may improve ED-to-inpatient handoff safety and efficiency in teaching hospitals. This model has not yet been studied in non-teaching hospitals. The objectives of the study were to determine the efficiency of an eSignout platform at a community affiliate hospital by comparing ED length of stay (LOS) for a 5-month period before and after implementation and to compare the quality assurance (QA) events among admitted patients for the same time period. A retrospective, interventional study was conducted with the main outcome measures including ED LOS with calculation of 95% CI, mean comparison (t test), and number of QA events before and after implementation of the eSignout model. Prior to eSignout implementation, 1045 patients were admitted [mean ED LOS 330.0 min (95% CI 318.6–341.4)]. Following implementation, 1106 patients were admitted [mean ED LOS 338.9 min (95% CI 327.4–350.4, p = 0.2853)]. Nine pre-implementation QA events and six post-implementation events were identified. Use of a physician eSignout in a non-teaching hospital had no statistically significant effect on ED LOS for the admitted patients. The effect of an electronic interdepartmental handoff tool for patient safety and clinical operations in the non-teaching setting is unclear.
KeywordsEmergency care Quality improvement Information technology Electronic handoff Patient safety
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Statement of human and animal rights
All procedures performed in this study were in accordance with the ethical standards of the independent Beth Israel-Needham oversight and quality assurance committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
For this type of study (retrospective), formal consent is not required.
- 12.Snow V, Beck D, Budnitz T, Miller DC, Potter J, Wears RL, Weiss KB, Williams MV (2009) Transitions of Care consensus policy statement: American College of Physicians, Society of General Internal Medicine, Society of Hospital Medicine, American Geriatrics Society, American College of Emergency Physicians, and Society for Academic Emergency Medicine. J Hosp Med 6:364–370CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 16.Centers for Medicare and Medicaid services: glossary and acronyms; (updated 2016 July 27). https://www.cms.gov/OpenPayments/About/Glossary-and-Acronyms.html#teachinghospital. Accessed 5 Feb 2018