Advertisement

Internal and Emergency Medicine

, Volume 13, Issue 7, pp 989–992 | Cite as

Direct oral anticoagulants: what can we learn?

  • Francesco Marongiu
  • Doris Barcellona
POINTS OF VIEW

Abstract

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) represent an innovation because they avoid periodic laboratory monitoring, and also reduce cerebral bleeding. An examination of the performance of DOACs versus warfarin in randomized clinical trials dedicated to atrial fibrillation would reveal the poor performance of warfarin because the percentage of major bleeding is always above 3%; however, the percentage of major bleeding is less than half of that when the management is done in anticoagulation clinics (ACs). Several years ago, a common opinion was that ACs would disappear as soon as DOACs enter the market. We proposed then that ACs could be transformed into thrombosis centres (TCs) because we envisaged many new activities in terms of diagnostic tools and therapeutic choices. After the introduction of DOACs, the role of the ACs has been re-evaluated because their role may be crucial in selecting both the most appropriate diagnostic approach and the best therapeutic option (including anti-vitamin K drugs) for the single patient. TCs can organize a regular follow-up to improve patient adherence to DOACs. Marketing might have a role in the decision making of the single doctor. Efforts should be made for limiting the relationships between doctors and pharmaceutical companies. It seems reasonable to better prepare doctors, during their university courses, for them to develop a greater scientific culture that would enable them to critically read clinical studies and acquire an independent opinion. Ideally, an expert in haemostasis and thrombosis should handle new and old anticoagulants.

Keywords

Direct oral anticoagulants Anticoagulation clinics Warfarin Atrial fibrillation Thrombosis centers 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Statement of human and animal rights

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was not required for this type of study.

References

  1. 1.
    Prisco D, Ageno W, Becattini C, D’Angelo A, Davì G, De Cristofaro R et al; SIMI (Italian Society of Internal Medicine); FADOI (Federation of Associations of Hospital Doctors on Internal Medicine); SISET (Italian Society for the Study of Haemostasis and Thrombosis) (2017) Italian intersociety consensus on DOAC use in internal medicine. Intern Emerg Med 12(3):387–406CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ruff CT, Giugliano RP, Braunwald E, Hoffman EB, Deenadayalu N, Ezekowitz MD et al (2014) Comparison of the efficacy and safety of new oral anticoagulants with warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation: a meta-analysis of randomised trials. Lancet 383(9921):955–962CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Palareti G, Antonucci E, Migliaccio L, Erba N, Marongiu F, Pengo V et al; Centers participating in the FCSA-START-Register (The ISCOAT 2016 study: Italian Study on Complications of Oral Anticoagulant Therapy-2016) (2017) Vitamin K antagonist therapy: changes in the treated populations and in management results in Italian anticoagulation clinics compared with those recorded 20 years ago. Intern Emerg Med 12(8):1109–1119Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Antonucci E, Poli D, Tosetto A, Pengo V, Tripodi A, Magrini N et al (2015) The Italian START-register on anticoagulation with focus on atrial fibrillation. PLoS One 10(5):e0124719CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Tosetto A, Manotti C, Marongiu F, Italian Federation of Anticoagulation Clinics (FCSA) clinical quality study group (2015) Center-related determinants of VKA anticoagulation quality: a prospective, multicenter evaluation. PLoS One 10(12):e0144314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Marongiu F, Barcellona D (2005) The future of anticoagulation clinics: a journey to thrombosis centers? Haematologica 90(3):298–301PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Barnes GD, Nallamothu BK, Sales AE, Froehlich JB (2016) Reimagining anticoagulation clinics in the era of direct oral anticoagulants. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes 9(2):182–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Stiggelbout AM, Van der Weijden T, De Wit MP, Frosch D et al (2012) Shared decision making: really putting patients at the centre of healthcare. BMJ 344:e256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ho PM, Bryson CL, Rumsfeld JS (2009) Medication adherence: its importance in cardiovascular outcomes. Circulation 119(23):3028–3303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Borne RT, O’Donnell C, Turakhia MP, Varosy PD, Jackevicius CA, Marzec LN et al (2017) Adherence and outcomes to direct oral anticoagulants among patients with atrial fibrillation: findings from the veterans health administration. BMC Cardiovasc Disord 17(1):236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    European Commission (2009) Enterprise and industry directorate-general. In: Notice to applicants. A guideline on summary of product characteristics (SmPC), revison 2, pp 1–29Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Barcellona D, Luzza M, Nicola Battino N, Fenu L, Marongiu F (2015) The criteria of the Italian Federation of Thrombosis Centres on DOACs: a ‘‘real world’’ application in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation patients already on Vitamin K antagonist. Intern Emerg Med 10(2):157–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Pengo V, Crippa L, Falanga A, Finazzi G, Marongiu F, Palareti G et al (2011) Questions and answers on the use of dabigatran and perspectives on the use of other new oral anticoagulants in patients with atrial fibrillation. A consensus document of the Italian Federation of Thrombosis Centers (FCSA). Thromb Haemost 106(5):868–876PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Tripodi A (2016) To measure or not to measure direct oral anticoagulants before surgery or invasive procedures. J Thromb Haemost 14(7):1325–1327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Selby R, Shah Z, Black L, Ongteco J, Kulkarni S, Piraino D (2017) To measure or not to measure direct oral anticoagulants before surgery or invasive procedures: comment. J Thromb Haemost 15(1):200–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Testa S, Tripodi A, Legnani C, Pengo V, Abbate R, Dellanoce C et al (2016) Plasma levels of direct oral anticoagulants in real life patients with atrial fibrillation: results observed in four anticoagulation clinics. Thromb Res 137:178–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Marongiu F, Barcellona D (2014) Direct inhibitors of thrombin and factor Xa: the importance of laboratory skills. Intern Emerg Med 9(8):897–898CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Moynihan R (2003) Who pays for the pizza? Redefining the relationships between doctors and drug companies. 2: disentanglement. BMJ 326(7400):1193–1196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ioannidis JPA (2016) The mass production of redundant, misleading, and conflicted systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Milbank Q 94(3):485–514CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Lenzer J (2013) Why we can’t trust clinical guidelines. BMJ 346:f3830CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© SIMI 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Medical Sciences and Public HealthUniversity of CagliariCagliariItaly

Personalised recommendations