Advertisement

Acta Physiologiae Plantarum

, 41:149 | Cite as

Drought effects on growth, water status, proline content and antioxidant system in three Salvia nemorosa L. cultivars

  • Hassan BayatEmail author
  • Ali Naseri Moghadam
Original Article
  • 123 Downloads

Abstract

Plant growth and yield are influenced by various environmental stresses, especially drought. An experiment was done to study the comparative effects of water stress on growth, physiology and antioxidant systems in three Salvia nemorosa L. cultivars (‘Isfahan’, ‘Violet Queen’ and ‘Rose Queen’). The cultivars were treated as control or water stress by stopping irrigation for 10 days. The results showed that the highest number of leaves per plant, leaf area, dry weight of root and shoot and total biomass were obtained from native cultivar ‘Isfahan’ under water shortage. Relative water content, chlorophyll a, b and total chlorophyll reduced in all studied cultivars under drought; but the rate of reduction was the lowest in ‘Isfahan’. Drought stress increased total soluble sugar in the root and leaf tissues in all cultivars and the highest values were obtained from native cultivar ‘Isfahan’. Drought stress also increased proline content, total phenols and flavonoids in all tested cultivars; but the rate of increase in ‘Isfahan’ was higher than the other cultivars. The activities of catalase and peroxidase enzymes enhanced in all cultivars under drought stress conditions; however, their activities were higher in ‘Isfahan’ than the other cultivars. Among the cultivars studied, it was found that ‘Isfahan’ was more tolerant which was revealed by physiological and biochemical characteristics.

Keywords

Catalase Environmental stresses Relative water content Total flavonoids and phenols Total soluble sugar 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the University of Birjand, Birjand, Iran [Grant number 18873].

References

  1. Arnon DI (1949) Copper enzyme in isolated chloroplast poly phenol oxidase in Beta vulgaris. Plant Physiol 24:1–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Azarmi F, Mozafari V, Abbaszadeh Dahaji P, Hamidpour M (2015) Biochemical, physiological and antioxidant enzymatic activity responses of pistachio seedlings treated with plant growth promoting rhizobacteria and Zn to salinity stress. Acta Physiol Plant 38:21.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11738-015-2032-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bahadori MB, Valizadeh H, Asghari B, Dinparast L, Farimani MM, Bahadori S (2015) Chemical composition and antimicrobial, cytotoxicity, antioxidant and enzyme inhibitory activities of Salvia spinosa L. J Funct Foods 18:727–736.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jff.2015.09.011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barranco D, Ruiz N, Gomes M (2005) Frost tolerance of eight olive cultivars. Hortscience 40:558–560CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bates L, Waldren R, Teare I (1973) Rapid determination of free proline for water-stress studies. Plant Soil 39:205–207.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00018060 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bayat H, Nemati H, Tehranifar A, Gazanchian A (2016) Screening different crested wheatgrass (Agropyron cristatum (L.) Gaertner) accessions for drought stress tolerance. Arch Agron Soil Sci 62:769–780.  https://doi.org/10.1080/03650340.2015.1094182 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bettaieb I, Hamrouni-Sellami I, Bourgou S, Limam F, Marzouk B (2011) Drought effects on polyphenol composition and antioxidant activities in aerial parts of Salvia officinalis L. Acta Physiol Plant 33(4):1103–1111.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11738-010-0638-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Caser M, D’Angiolillo F, Chitarra W, Lovisolo C, Ruffoni B, Pistelli L, Pistelli L, Scariot V (2018) Ecophysiological and phytochemical responses of Salvia sinaloensis Fern. to drought stress. J Plant Growth Regul 84:383–394.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10725-017-0349-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chakhchar A, Lamaoui M, Wahbi S, Ferradous A, El Mousadik A, Ibnsouda- Koraichi S, Filali-Maltouf A, Modafar CE (2015) Leaf water status, osmoregulation and secondary metabolism as a model for depicting drought tolerance in Argania spinosa. Acta Physiol Plant 37(4):80–96.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11738-015-1833-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. di Ferdinando M, Brunetti C, Agati G, Tattini M (2014) Multiple functions of polyphenols in plants inhabiting unfavorable Mediterranean areas. Environ Exp Bot 103:107–116.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2013.09.012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Edziri H, Mastouri M, Cheheb H, Laameri S, Boujnah D (2017) The effect of water stress on leaf phenolic composition, fluorescence parameters, xylem hydraulic properties and antiradical activity of four Tunisian olive (Olea europaea L.) cultivars. J Plant Biochem Physiol 5:193.  https://doi.org/10.4172/2329-9029.1000193 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Farimani MM, Bahadori MB, Koulaei SA, Salehi P, Ebrahimi SN, Khavasi HR, Hamburger M (2015) New ursane triterpenoids from Salvia urmiensis Bunge: absolute configuration and anti-proliferative activity. Fitoterapia 106:1–6.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fitote.2015.07.017 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Farooq M, Wahid A, Kobayashi N, Fujita D, Basra SMA (2009) Plant drought stress: effects, mechanisms and management. Agron Sustain Dev 29:185–212.  https://doi.org/10.1051/agro:2008021 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gil R, Lull C, Boscaiu M, Bautista I, Lidon A, Vicente O (2011) Soluble carbohydrates as osmolytes in several halophytes from a Mediterranean salt marsh. Not Bot Hortic Agrobot Cluj-Napoca 39:9–17.  https://doi.org/10.15835/nbha3927176 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gonzalez L, Gonzalez-Vilar M (2003) Determination of relative water content. In: Reigosa MJ (ed) Handbook of plant ecophysiology techniques. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, pp 207–212.  https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-48057-3_14 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Guerfel M, Baccouri O, Boujnah D, Chaibi W, Zarrouk M (2009) Impacts of water stress on gas exchange, water relations, chlorophyll content and leaf structure in the two main Tunisian olive (Olea europaea L.) cultivars. Sci Hortic 119:257–263.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2008.08.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Huseynova IM (2012) Photosynthetic characteristics and enzymatic antioxidant capacity of leaves from wheat cultivars exposed to drought. Biochim Biophys Acta 1817:1516–1523.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbabio.2012.02.037 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Irigoyen JJ, Emerich DW, SanchezDiaz M (1992) Water stress induced changes in concentrations of proline and total soluble sugars in nodulated alfalfa (Medicago sativa) plants. Physiol Plant 84:55–60.  https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1399-3054.1992.840109.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Jinrong L, Xiaorong XD, Jixiong S, Xiaomin B (2008) Effects of simultaneous drought and heat stress on Kentucky bluegrass. Sci Hortic 115:190–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Karimi S, Yadollahi A, Arzani K, Imani A (2015) Gas exchange response of almond genotypes to water stress. Photosynthetica 53(1):29–34.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11099-015-0070-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Khakdan F, Ranjbar M, Nasiri J, Ahmadi FS, Bagheri A, Alizadeh H (2016) The relationship between antioxidant compounds contents and antioxidant enzymes under water-deficit stress in the three Iranian cultivars of basil (Ocimum basilicum L.). Acta Physiol Plant 38:226.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11738-016-2241-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Khan N, Bano A, Babar MA (2016) The root growth of wheat plants, the water conservation and fertility status of sandy soils influenced by plant growth promoting rhizobacteria. Symbiosis 72(3):195–205.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13199-016-0457-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Khan N, Ali S, Shahid MA, Kharabian-Masouleh A (2017) Advances in detection of stress tolerance in plants through metabolomics approaches. Plant Omics 10(3):153–163.  https://doi.org/10.21475/poj.10.03.17.pne600 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Khan N, Bano A, Rahman MA, Rathinasabapathi B, Babar MA (2019) UPLC-HRMS-based untargeted metabolic profiling reveals changes in chickpea (Cicer arietinum) metabolome following long-term drought stress. Plant Cell Environ 42(1):115–132.  https://doi.org/10.1111/pce.13195 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Krasensky J, Jonak C (2012) Drought, salt, and temperature stress induced metabolic rearrangements and regulatory networks. J Exp Bot 63:1593–1608.  https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/err460 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  26. Liu H, Wang X, Wang D, Zou Z, Liang Z (2011) Effect of drought stress on growth and accumulation of active constituents in Salvia miltiorrhiza Bunge. Ind Crops Prod 33:84–88.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2010.09.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lu YR, Foo LY (2002) Polyphenolics of Salvia—a review. Phytochemistry 59(2):117–140.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0031-9422(01)00415-0 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Madani K (2014) Water management in Iran: what is causing the looming crisis? J Environ Stud Sci 4:315–328.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13412-014-0182-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Mansori M, Chernane H, Latique S, Benaliat A, Hsissou D, El Kaoua M (2016) Effect of seaweed extract (Ulva rigida) on the water deficit tolerance of Salvia officinalis L. J Appl Phycol 28:1363–1370.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10811-015-0671-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Mardani H, Bayat H, Saeidnejad AH, Rezaie E (2012) Assessment of salicylic acid impacts on seedling characteristic of cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) under water stress. Not Sci Biol 4(1):112–115.  https://doi.org/10.15835/nsb417258 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Rezayian M, Niknam V, Ebrahimzadeh H (2018) Effects of drought stress on the seedling growth, development, and metabolic activity in different cultivars of canola. J Soil Sci Plant Nutr 64:360–369.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00380768.2018.1436407 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Sadiq M, Akram NA, Ashraf M (2018) Impact of exogenously applied tocopherol on some key physio-biochemical and yield attributes in mungbean [Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek] under limited irrigation regimes. Acta Physiol Plant 40(7):131.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11738-018-2711-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Sadok W, Sinclair TR (2011) Crops yield increase under water-limited conditions: review of recent physiological advances for soybean genetic improvement. Adv Agron 113:313–337.  https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-386473-4.00007-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Singleton VL, Rossi JA (1965) Colorimetry of total phenolics with phosphomolybdic-phosphotungstic acid reagents. Am J Enol Vitic 16(3):144–148Google Scholar
  35. Skala E, Wysokinska H (2004) In vitro regeneration of Salvia nemorosa L. from shoot tips and leaf explants. Vitro Cell Dev Biol Plant 40(6):596–602CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Sofo A, Dichio B, Xiloyannis C, Masia A (2004) Effects of different irradiance levels on some antioxidant enzymes and on malondialdehyde content during rewatering in olive tree. Plant Sci 166:293–302.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plantsci.2003.09.018 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Tavallali V, Karimi S, Espargham O (2017) Boron enhances antioxidative defense in the leaves of salt-affected Pistacia vera seedlings. Hortic J 87:55–62.  https://doi.org/10.2503/hortj.OKD-062 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Tsugane K, Kobayashi K, Niwa Y, Ohbo Y, Wada K, Kobayashi H (1999) A recessive Arabidopsis mutant that grows photoautotrophically under stress shows enhanced active oxygen detoxification. Plant Cell 11:1195–1206.  https://doi.org/10.2307/3870742 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  39. Yoo KM, Lee CH, Lee H, Moon B, Lee CY (2008) Relative antioxidant and cytoprotective activities of common herbs. Food Chem 106(3):929–936.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2007.07.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Zhang C, Huang Z (2013) Effects of endogenous abscisic acid, jasmonic acid, polyamines, and polyamine oxidase activity in tomato seedlings under drought stress. Sci Hortic 159:172–177.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2013.05.013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Zhang J, Kirkham MB (1994) Drought-stress-induced changes in activities of superoxide dismutase, catalase, and peroxidase in wheat species. Plant Cell Physiol 35:785–791.  https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.pcp.a078658 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Zhang H, Mao X, Wang C, Jing R (2010) Overexpression of a common wheat gene TaSnRK2.8 enhances tolerance to drought, salt and low temperature in Arabidopsis. PLoS One 5(12):e16041.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0016041 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  43. Zhang L, Li Q, Yang X, Xia Z (2012) Effects of sodium selenite and germination on the sprouting of chickpeas (Cicer arietinum L.) and its content of selenium, formononetin and biochanin A in the sprouts. Biol Trace Elem Res 146(3):376–380.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12011-011-9261-0 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Franciszek Górski Institute of Plant Physiology, Polish Academy of Sciences, Kraków 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Horticultural Science, Faculty of AgricultureUniversity of BirjandBirjandIran

Personalised recommendations