Advertisement

Acta Physiologiae Plantarum

, 41:161 | Cite as

Metabolomics reveals the drought-tolerance mechanism in wild soybean (Glycine soja)

  • Xiaoxia Wang
  • Rui GuoEmail author
  • Mingxia Li
  • Yuan Liu
  • Mingli Zhao
  • Hui Fu
  • Xueying Liu
  • Shiyao Wang
  • Lianxuan ShiEmail author
Original Article
  • 83 Downloads

Abstract

Drought stress is the main limiting factor of crop productivity. Wild soybean (Glycine soja) is a fine germplasm resource, which has a high tolerance to adverse environmental conditions. This study aimed to reveal the mechanism responsible for drought tolerance in drought-tolerant wild soybean. Here, the growth parameters and metabolomics of the two wild soybean varieties’ seedlings were analyzed under polyethylene glycol-simulated drought stress using gas chromatography–mass spectrometry. In total, 61 differentially accumulated metabolites were identified in leaves under polyethylene glycol-6000-simulated drought conditions. Compared with common wild soybean, the drought-tolerant wild soybean grew better. A metabolite profiling analysis suggested that the tricarboxylic acid cycle was enhanced in drought-tolerant wild soybean but inhibited in common wild soybean compared with the control group under simulated drought stress. Thus, the accumulation of osmotic compounds and the enhancement of energy and secondary antioxidant metabolism under drought-stress conditions are the mechanisms responsible for drought tolerance in drought-tolerant wild soybean. The results provide an important theoretical basis for utilizing wild soybean resources.

Keywords

Drought stress Metabolomics Osmotic adjustment Plant growth Soybean 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (no. 31870278) and the Collaborative Innovation of Scientific and Technological of Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences. We thank Jilin Academy of Agriculture Science for helping. We thank International Science Editing (http://www.internationalscienceediting.com) for editing this manuscript.

Supplementary material

11738_2019_2939_MOESM1_ESM.docx (621 kb)
The following additional information is available in the online version of this article—Online Resource 1 Total ion current gas chromatography–mass spectrometry chromatograms of leaf extracts from two wild soybean varieties (DOCX 621 kb)
11738_2019_2939_MOESM2_ESM.docx (35 kb)
The following additional information is available in the online version of this article—Online Resource 2 The contributions of metabolites from two wild soybean varieties’ seedling leaves to the first principal component (PC1) and the second principal component (PC2) (DOCX 34 kb)

References

  1. Adamski J, Suhre K (2013) Metabolomics platforms for genome wide association studies-linking the genome to the metabolome. Curr Opin Biotech 24:39–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ahmed IM, Nadira UA, Bibi N, Cao F, He X, Zhang G, Wu F (2015) Secondary metabolism and antioxidants are involved in the tolerance to drought and salinity, separately and combined, in Tibetan wild barley. Environ Exp Bot 111:1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Araujo WL, Nunes-Nesi A, Nikoloski Z, Sweetlove LJ, Fernie AR (2012) Metabolic control and regulation of the tricarboxylic acid cyclein photosynthetic and heterotrophic plant tissues. Plant Cell Environ 35:1–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ashraf M, Foolad MR (2007) Roles of glycine betaine and proline in improving plant abiotic stress resistance. Environ Exp Bot 59:206–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ashrafi M, Azimi-Moqadam MR, Moradi P, MohseniFard E, Shekari F, Kompany-Zareh M (2018) Effect of drought stress on metabolite adjustments in drought tolerant and sensitive thyme. Plant Physiol Bioch 132:391–399CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Baxter A, Mittler R, Suzuki N (2014) Ros as key players in plant stress signalling. J Exp Bot 65:1229–1240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bohnert HJ, Nelson DE, Jensen RG (1995) Adaptations to environmental stresses. Plant Cell 7:1099–1111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bouche N, Fromm H (2004) GABA in plants: just a metabolite? Trends Plant Sci 9:110–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bourgaud F, Gravot A, Milesi S, Gontier E (2001) Production of plant secondary metabolites: a historical perspective. Plant Sci 161:839–851CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chaves MM, Flexas J, Pinheiro C (2008) Photosynthesis under drought and salt stress: regulation mechanisms from whole plant to cell. Ann Bot 103:551–560CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chen Q, Tao SY, Bi XH, Xu X, Wang LL, Li XM (2013) Research progress in physiological and molecular biology mechanism of drought resistance in rice. Am J Mol Biol 3:102–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chiang PK, Gordon RK, Tal J, Zeng GC, Doctor BP, Pardhasaradhi K, McCann PP (1996) S-adenosylmethionine and methylation. FASEB J 10:471–480CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Corso M, Vannozzi A, Maza E, Vitulo N, Meggio F, Pitacco A, Telatin A, D’Angelo M, Feltrin E, Negri AS, Prinsi B, Valle G, Ramina A, Bouzayen M, Bonghi C, Lucchin M (2015) Comprehensive transcript profiling of two grapevine rootstock genotypes contrasting in drought susceptibility links the phenylpropanoid pathway to enhanced tolerance. J Exp Bot 66:5739–5752CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cramer GR, Urano K, Delrot S, Pezzotti M, Shinozaki K (2011) Effects of abiotic stress on plants: a systems biology perspective. BMC Plant Biol 11:1–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Edreva A, Velikova V, Tsonev T, Dagnon S, Gürel A, Akta SL, Gesheva E (2008) Stress-protective role of secondary metabolites: diversity of functions and mechanisms. Gen Appl Plant Physiol 34:67–78Google Scholar
  16. Ekmekçi Y, Tanyolaç D, Ayhan B (2009) A crop tolerating oxidative stress induced by excess lead: maize. Acta Physiol Plant 31:319–330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Furlan AL, Bianucci E, Castro S, Dietz KJ (2017) Metabolic features involved in drought stress tolerance mechanisms in peanut nodules and their contribution to biological nitrogen fixation. Plant Sci 263:12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gill SS, Tuteja N (2010) Reactive oxygen species and antioxidant machinery in abiotic stress tolerance in crop plants. Plant Physiol Biochem 48:909–930CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Grierson CS, Barnes SR, Chase MW, Clarke M, Grierson D, Edwards KJ, Jellis GJ, Jones JD, Knapp S, Oldroyd G, Poppy G, Temple P, Williams R, Bastow R (2011) One hundred important questions facing plant science research. New Phytol 192:6–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Guo R, Shi LX, Jiao Y, Li MX, Zhong XL, Gu FX, Liu Q, Xia X, Li HR (2018) Metabolic responses to drought stress in the tissues of drought-tolerant and drought-sensitive wheat genotype seedlings. AoB Plants 10:2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hein JA, Sherrard ME, Manfredi KP, Abebe T (2016) The fifth leaf and spike organs of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) display different physiological and metabolic responses to drought stress. BMC Plant Biol 16:248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hura T, Hura K, Dziurka K, Ostrowska A, Baczek-Kwinta R, Grzesiak M (2012) An increase in the content of cell wall-bound phenolics correlates with the productivity of triticale under soil drought. J Plant Physiol 169:1728–1736CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Jiao Y, Bai ZZ, Xu JY, Zhao ML, Khan Y, Hu YJ, Shi LX (2018) Metabolomics and its physiological regulation process reveal the salt-tolerant mechanism in glycine soja seedling roots. Plant Physiol Bioch 126:187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Khan N, Bano A, Rahman MA, Rathinasabapathi B, Babar MA (2018) Uplc-hrms based untargeted metabolic profiling reveals changes in chickpea (Cicer arietinum) metabolome following long-term drought stress. Plant Cell Environ 42:115–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kingsbury RW, Epstein E, Pearcy RW (1984) Physiological responses to salinity inselected lines of wheat. Plant Physiol 74:417–423CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kocsy G, Laurie R, Szalai G, Szilágyi V, Simon-Sarkadi L, Galiba G, Jacoba A, Ronde D (2010) Genetic manipulation of proline levels affects antioxidants in soybean subjected to simultaneous drought and heat stresses. Physiol Plantarum 124:227–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lam HM, Xu X, Liu X, Chen WB, Yang GH, Wong FL, Li MW, He WM, Qin N, Wang B, Li J, Jian M, Wang J, Shao GH, Sun SSM, Zhang GY (2010) Resequencing of 31 wild and cultivated soybean genomes identifes patterns of genetic diversity and selection. Nat Genet 42:1053–1059CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Less H, Galili G (2008) Principal transcriptional programs regulating plant amino acid metabolism in response to abiotic stresses. Plant Physiol 147:316–330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Li MX, Guo R, Jiao Y, Jin XF, Zhang HY, Shi LX (2017) Comparison of salt tolerance in soja based on metabolomics of seedling roots. Front Plant Sci 8:1101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Li MX, Xu JS, Wang XX, Fu H, Zhao ML, Wang H, Shi LX (2018) Photosynthetic characteristics and metabolic analyses of two soybean genotypes revealed adaptive strategies to low-nitrogen stress. J Plant Physiol 229:132–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Marcinska I, Czyczyło-Mysza I, Skrzypek E, Filek M, Grzesiak S, Grzesiak MT, Janowiak F, Hura T, Dziurka M, Dziurka K, Nowakowska A, Quarrie SA (2013) Impact of osmotic stress on physiological and biochemical characteristics in drought susceptible and drought-resistant wheat genotypes. Acta Physiol Plant 35:451–461CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Mejri M, Siddique KHM, Saif T, Abdelly C, Hessini K (2016) Comparative effect of drought duration on growth, photosynthesis, water relations, and solute accumulation in wild and cultivated barley species. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci 179:327–335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Mibei EK, Owino WO, Ambuko J, Giovannoni JJ, Onyango AN (2017) Metabolomic analyses to evaluate the effect of drought stress on selected African eggplant accessions. J Sci Food Agr 98:205–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Mikami K, Murata N (2003) Membrane fluidity and the perception of environmental signals in cyanobacteria and plants. Prog Lipid Res 42:527–543CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Moschen S, Rienzo JAD, Higgins J, Tohge T, Watanabe M, González S, Rivarola M, García-García F, Dopazo J, Esteban HH, Hoefgen R, Fernie AR, Paniego N, Fernández P, Heinz RA (2017) Integration of transcriptomic and metabolic data reveals hub, transcription factors involved in drought stress response in sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.). Plant Mol Biol 94:1–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Nakabayashi R, Yonekurasakakibara K, Urano K, Suzuki M, Yamada Y, Nishizawa T, Matsuda F, Kojima M, Sakakibara H, Shinozaki K, Michael AJ, Tohge T, Yamazaki M, Saito K (2014) Enhancement of oxidative and drought tolerance in arabidopsis by overaccumulation of antioxidant flavonoids. Plant J 77:367–379CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Omidi H, Shams H, Sahandi MS, Rajabian T, Miransari M (2018) Balangu (Lallemantia sp.) growth and physiology under field drought conditions affecting plant medicinal content. Plant Physiol Bioch 130:641–646CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Patel TK, Williamson JD (2016) Mannitol in plants, fungi, and plant-fungal interactions. Trends Plant Sci 21:486–497CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Piasecka A, Sawikowska A, Kuczyńska A, Ogrodowicz P, Mikołajczak K, Krystkowiak K, Gudys K, Guzy-Wrobelska J, Krajewski P, Kachlicki P (2017) Drought-related secondary metabolites of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) leaves and their metabolomic quantitative trait loci. Plant J 89:898–913CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Rabara RC, Tripathi P, Rushton PJ (2014) The potential of transcription factor-based genetic engineering in improving crop tolerance to drought. OMICS J Integr Biol 18:601–614CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Rabara RC, Tripathi P, Rushton PJ (2017) Comparative metabolome profile between tobacco and soybean grown under water-stressed conditions. Biomed Res Int 2017:3065251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Rhodes D, Hanson AD (1993) Quaternary ammonium and tertiary sulphonium compounds in higher plants. Annu Rev Plant Biol 44:357–383CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Ronde JAD, Mescht AVD, Steyn HSF (2000) Proline accumulation in response to drought and heat stress in cotton. Afr Crop Sci J 8:85–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Saito K, Matsuda F (2010) Metabolomics for functional genomics, systems biology, and biotechnology. Annu Rev Plant Biol 61:463–489CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Schmidhuber J, Tubiello FN (2007) Global food security under climate change. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104:19703–19708CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Shao S, Li MX, Yang DS, Zhang J, Shi LX (2016) The physiological variations of adaptation mechaniam in Glycine soja seedlings under saline and alkaline stresses. Pak J Bot 48:2183–2193Google Scholar
  47. Shi HT, Ye TT, Song B, Qi XQ, Chan ZL (2015) Comparative physiological and metabolomic responses of four brachypodium distachyon, varieties contrasting in drought stress resistance. Acta Physiol Plant 37:122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Sicher RC, Timlin D, Bailey B (2012) Responses of growth and primary metabolism of water-stressed barley roots to rehydration. J Plant Physiol 169:686–695CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Silvente S, Sobolev AP, Lara M (2012) Metabolite adjustments in drought tolerant and sensitive soybean genotypes in response to water stress. Plos One 7:e38554CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Sun CX, Gao XX, Fu JQ, Zhou JH, Wu XF (2015) Metabolic response of maize (Zea mays L.) plants to combined drought and salt stress. Plant Soil 388:99–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Tardieu F, Tuberosa R (2010) Dissection and modelling of abiotic stress tolerance in plants. Curr Opin Plant Biol 13:206–212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Ullah N, Yüce M, Gökçe ZNÖ, Budak H (2017) Comparative metabolite profiling of drought stress in roots and leaves of seven triticeae species. BMC Genomics 18:969CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Urano K, Maruyama K, Ogata Y, Morishita Y, Takeda M, Sakurai N, Suzuki H, Saito K, Shibata D, Kobayashi M, Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K, Shinozaki K (2009) Characterization of the aba-regulated global responses to dehydration in arabidopsis by metabolomics. Plant J 57:1065–1078CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Warth B, Parich A, Bueschl C, Schoefbeck D, Neumann NKN, Kluger B, Schuster K, Krska R, Adam G, Lemmens M, Schuhmacher R (2015) GC–MS based targeted metabolic profiling identifies changes in the wheat metabolome following deoxynivalenol treatment. Metabolomics 11:722–738CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Wu DZ, Cai SG, Chen MX, Ye LZ, Chen ZH, Zhang HT, Dai F, Wu FB, Zhang GP (2013) Tissue metabolic responses to salt stress in wild and cultivated barley. Plos One 8:e55431CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Wu XJ, Cai KF, Zhang GP, Zeng FR (2017) Metabolite profiling of barley grains subjected to water stress: to explain the genotypic difference in drought-induced impacts on malting quality. Front Plant Sci 8:1547CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Xue ZC, Zhao SJ, Gao HY, Sun S (2014) The salt resistance of wild soybean (Glycine soja Sieb. et Zucc. ZYD 03262) under NaCl stress is mainly determined by Na+ distribution in the plant. Acta Physiol Plant 36:61–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Yang DS, Zhang J, Li MX, Shi LX (2017) Metabolomics analysis reveals the salt-tolerant mechanism in glycine soja. J Plant Growth Reg 36:1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Yang LM, Fountain JC, Ji P, Ni X, Chen S, Lee RD, Kemerait RC, Guo B (2018) Deciphering drought-induced metabolic responses and regulation in developing maize kernels. Plant Biotechnol J 16:1616–1628CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Yi XP, Zhang YL, Yao HS, Luo HH, Gou L, Chow WS, Zhang WF (2016) Rapid recovery of photosynthetic rate following soil water deficit and re-watering in cotton plants (Gossypium herbaceum L.) is related to the stability of the photosystems. J Plant Physiol 194:23–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Yokoi S, Bressan RA, Hasegawa PM (2002) Salt stress tolerance of plants. JIRCAS Working Report, pp 25–33Google Scholar
  62. Yu TF, Xu ZS, Guo JK, Wang YX, Abernathy B, Fu JD, Chen X, Zhou YB, Chen M, Ye XG, Ma YZ (2017) Improved drought tolerance in wheat plants overexpressing a synthetic bacterial cold shock protein gene secspa. Sci Rep 7:44050CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Zhang M, Barg R, Yin MG, Gueta-Dahan Y, Leikin-Frenkel A, Salts Y, Shabtai S, Ben-Hayyim G (2010) Modulated fatty acid desaturation via overexpression of two distinct omega-3 desaturases differentially alters tolerance to various abiotic stresses in transgenic tobacco cells and plants. Plant J 44:361–371CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Zhang J, Yang DS, Li MX, Shi LX (2016) Metabolic profiles reveal changes in wild and cultivated soybean seedling leaves under salt stress. Plos One 11:e0159622CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Zungia GE, Fernandez J, Cristi R, Alberdi M, Corcuera LJ (1990) Lipid changes in barley seedlings subjected to water and cold stress. Phytochemistry 29:3087–3090CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Franciszek Górski Institute of Plant Physiology, Polish Academy of Sciences, Kraków 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Key Laboratory of Vegetation Ecology, Ministry of Education, Institute of Grassland ScienceNortheast Normal UniversityChangchunPeople’s Republic of China
  2. 2.Key Laboratory of Dryland Agriculture, Institute of Environment and Sustainable Development in AgricultureChinese Academy of Agricultural SciencesBeijingPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations