Advertisement

Dao

pp 1–16 | Cite as

A Confucian Solution to the Fungibility Problem of Friendship: Friends like Family with Particularized Virtues

  • Chenyang LiEmail author
Article

Abstract

When asked why we are friends with someone, we often point to her good virtues as reasons. If these are the reasons, we have equal reasons to be friends with anyone with such virtues, and we can even replace current friends with anyone with the same or better virtues without substantive loss in friendship. However, it does not seem right that a particular friend is replaceable by just any other person with the same or better virtues. This is the fungibility problem of friendship. This essay outlines a Confucian response to the problem on the basis of the Confucian family-based conception of friendship and the Confucian understanding of particularized virtues. First, in the Confucian understanding, true friends are like family members, toward whom we have special obligations. Family members are nonfungible, and so are friends. Second, even though virtues are general traits that can be shared, the formations and practices of virtues are particularized. Confucian thinkers hold that each person configures virtues and exercises virtues in his or her own way depending on specific circumstances, and that persons with the same virtues may nevertheless possess them in varied fashions and exercise different shades of them in particular ways. Thus, persons of the same generic virtues will still retain their particularities as distinctive individuals. We become friends and remain friends with people in part because of their virtues practiced in ways that we appreciate. This notion of particularly exercised virtues makes it practically impossible for two persons to be identical in virtues. On such an understanding, virtuous friends are nevertheless unique and nonfungible.

Keywords

Friendship Fungibility Confucianism Virtue Family Particularity 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

Acknowledgment

I would like to thank Elizabeth Harman, David Copp, Chris Suhler, and Kwok Sai Hang for their thoughtful comments on early versions of this essay, and the audiences at the Fourth Rutgers Workshop on Chinese Philosophy (RWCP) in 2018 and an ACPA group session at the American Philosophical Association Pacific Meeting in Vancouver in 2019, especially Kwong-loi Shun, Weimin Sun, Kenneth Holloway, and Ranjoo Herr, for their comments. My gratitude is also due to two anonymous referees of this journal for their critiques and suggestions.

References

  1. Ames, Roger T., and Henry Rosemont, Jr. 2014. “From Kupperman’s Character Ethics to Confucian Role Ethics: Putting Humpty Together Again.” In Moral Cultivation and Confucian Character, edited by Chenyang Li and Peimin Ni. Albany: The State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  2. Ames, Roger T., with W. Dissanayake and T. Kasulis, eds. 1994. Self as Person in Asian Theory and Practice. Albany: The State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  3. Badhwar, Neera K. 1987. “Friends as Ends in Themselves.” Philosophy & Phenomenological Research 48: 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cook, Scott. 2012. The Bamboo Texts of Guodian (I, II). Ithaca: East Asia Program, Cornell University.Google Scholar
  5. Elder, Alexis Melissa. 2013. Metaphysics of Friendship. Doctoral Dissertation at the University of Connecticut. https://opencommons.uconn.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=6478&context=dissertations (last accessed on June 23, 2018).
  6. Guoyu 國語. 2006–2019. In Chinese Text Project, edited by Donald Sturgeon. https://ctext.org/guo-yu/zh (last accessed on April 24, 2019).
  7. Helm, Bennett. 2017. “Friendship.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2017 Edition), edited by Edward N. Zalta.https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2017/entries/friendship/ (last accessed on July 9, 2019).
  8. Khayutina, Maria. 1999. “Friendship in Early China.” Paper presented at the 13th Conference of the Warring States Working Group, October 13–14, 1999, Lehigh University, Bethlehem, PA, USA. https://www.academia.edu/3435695/Friendshipin_Early_China (last accessed on June 26, 2018).
  9. King, Ambrose Y. C. 1985. “The Individual and Group in Confucianism: A Relational Perspective.” In Individualism and Holism: Studies in Confucian and Taoist Values, edited by Donald Munro. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  10. Lai, Whalen. 1996. “Friendship in Confucian China: Classical and Late Ming.” In Friendship East and West: Philosophical Perspectives, edited by Oliver Leaman. Richmond: Curzon Press.Google Scholar
  11. Lau, D. C, trans. 1970. Mencius: Translated with an Introduction. New York / London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  12. Li, Chenyang. 2014. The Confucian Philosophy of Harmony. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  13. Li, Xueqin 李學勤, ed. 2001. Annotations on the Book of History (Book of Zhou) 尚書正義 (周書), originally by Kong Anguo 孔安國, et al. Taipei 台北: Guji Chubanshe 古籍出版社.Google Scholar
  14. Lu, Xiufen. 2010. “Rethinking Confucian Friendship.” Asian Philosophy 20.3: 225–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Pakaluk, Michael, ed. 1991. Other Selves: Philosophers on Friendship. Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar
  16. Sturgeon, Donald. 2006–2019. Chinese Text Project: The Guodian Chu Slips 郭店楚墓竹簡, “The Five Conducts 五行.” https://ctext.org/wiki.pl?if=gb&chapter=992610&remap=gb (last accessed on April 24, 2019).
  17. Tai, Lian-Chang (Dai Lianzhang) 戴璉璋. 2003. “An Interpretation of the Confucian Doctrine of Shendu 儒家慎獨說的解讀.” Newsletter of the Institute of Chinese Literature and Philosophy 中國文哲研究通訊 23: 211–234.Google Scholar
  18. Tefler, Elizabeth. 1991. “Friendship.” In Other Selves: Philosophers on Friendship, edited by Michael Pakaluk. Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar
  19. Thirteen Classics with Commentaries 十三經注疏. 1985. Beijing 北京: Zhonghua Shuju 中華書局.Google Scholar
  20. Vervoorn, Aat. 2004. “Friendship in Ancient China.” East Asian History 27: 1–32.Google Scholar
  21. Wang, Ping. 2017. “The Chinese Concept of Friendship: Confucian Ethics and the Literati Narratives of Pre-Modern China.” In Conceptualizing Friendship in Time and Place, edited by Carla Risseeuw and Marlein van Raalte. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
  22. Wei, Qipeng 魏啟鵬. 2005. An Annotation of the Wuxing Bamboo and Silk 簡帛文獻《五行》箋證. Beijing 北京: Zhonghua Shuju 中華書局.Google Scholar
  23. Whiting, Jennifer E. 2016. First, Second, and Other Selves: Essays on Friendship and Personal Identity. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Yao, Xinzhong. 1996. “Self-construction and Identity: The Confucian Self in Relation to Some Western Perceptions.” Asian Philosophy 6.3: 179–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Yu, Jiyuan. 2007. The Ethics of Confucius and Aristotle: Mirrors of Virtue. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  26. Zha, Changguo 查昌國. 1998. “The Evolution of the Connection between Friendship and the Ruler-Minister Relationship in the Zhou Period 友與兩周君臣關係的演變.” Historical Research 歷史研究 5: 94–109.Google Scholar
  27. Zhu, Fenghan 朱鳳瀚. 2004. “A Study of Peng You 朋友考.” In A Study of the Clan Forms of the Shang-Zhou Period 西周家族型態研究. Tianjin 天津: Tianjin Guji Chubanshe 天津古籍出版社.Google Scholar
  28. Zuo Zhuan 左傳. 2006–2019. In Chinese Text Project, edited by Donald Sturgeon. https://ctext.org/chun-qiu-zuo-zhuan/zhao-gong/zh (last accessed on April 27, 2019).

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of HumanitiesNanyang Technological UniversitySingaporeSingapore

Personalised recommendations