Nunchi, Ritual, and Early Confucian Ethics
A central challenge for early Confucian ethics, which relies heavily on the moral rules, scripts, and instructions of ritual (li 禮), is to provide an account of how best to deviate from ritual when unexpected circumstances demand that one must do so. Many commentators have explored ways in which the Confucian tradition can meet this challenge, and one particularly interesting line of response to it focuses on “mind-reading”—the ability to infer others’ mental states from their behavior. In this article, I introduce nunchi 눈치, a Korean word meaning a keen social awareness and facility in dynamic social situations, and make the case that it represents a key component in a full account of how to best deviate from ritual.
KeywordsConfucianism Ritual Social intelligence Nunchi 눈치 Confucian ethics
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
This essay has benefitted from discussions with Amy Olberding, Nancy Snow, Sula You, and Sungwoo Um. Parts of this essay have been improved by helpful comments from Michael Puett and questions from the audience at the Harvard East Asia Society Graduate Conference, as well as from questions from the audience and discussions at the International Society for Chinese Philosophy Conference in Singapore and comments from anonymous referees. This publication was made possible through the support of a grant from the John Templeton Foundation to the Institute for the Study of Human Flourishing at The University of Oklahoma. The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the John Templeton Foundation, the Institute for the Study of Human Flourishing, or The University of Oklahoma.
- Brennan, Samantha. 2016. “The Moral Status of Micro-Inequities: In Favor of Institutional Solutions.” In Implicit Bias and Philosophy, edited by Michael Brownstein and Jennifer Saul. Vol. 2. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Choi, Sang-Chin, and Choi Soo-Hyang. 1992. “The Conceptualization of Korean Tact, Noon-Chi.” In Innovations in Cross-Cultural Psychology, edited by Iwawaki Saburo, Kashima Yoshihisa, and Leung Kwok. Berwyn, PA: Swets & Zeitlinger.Google Scholar
- Csikszentmihalyi, Mark. 2005. Material Virtue: Ethics and the Body in Early China. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
- Flanagan, Owen. 2017. The Geography of Morals: Varieties of Moral Possibility. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Hutton, Eric. 2002. “Moral Connoisseurship in Mengzi.” In Essays on the Moral Philosophy of Mengzi, edited by Liu Xiusheng and Phillip Ivanhoe. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing.Google Scholar
- ______, trans. 2014. Xunzi: The Complete Text. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
- Ivanhoe, Phillip. 2000. Confucian Moral Self-Cultivation. 2nd ed. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing.Google Scholar
- Kalton, Michael. 1979. Korean Ideas and Values. Elkins Park, PA: Philip Jaisohn Memorial Foundation.Google Scholar
- Martin, Samuel E., Lee Yang Ha, and Chang Sung-un. 1967. A Korean-English Dictionary. Yale Linguistic Series. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
- McDowell, John. 1998. Mind, Values, and Reality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- ______. 2016. “Etiquette: A Confucian Contribution to Moral Philosophy.” Ethics 126.2: 422–446.Google Scholar
- Sarkissian, Hagop. 2010. “Confucius and the Effortless Life of Virtue.” History of Philosophy Quarterly 27.1: 1–16.Google Scholar
- Slingerland, Edward, trans. 2003. Analects. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing.Google Scholar
- Snow, Nancy. 2010. Virtue as Social Intelligence: An Empirically Grounded Theory. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Stohr, Karen. 2012. On Manners. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Van Norden, Bryan, trans. 2008. Mengzi. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing.Google Scholar
- Wiggins, David. 1998. Needs, Values, Truth. 3rd ed. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
- Williams, Bernard. 1981. “Persons, Character, and Morality.” In Moral Luck, edited by James Rachels. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar