Advertisement

Dao

pp 1–18 | Cite as

Nunchi, Ritual, and Early Confucian Ethics

  • Seth RobertsonEmail author
Article

Abstract

A central challenge for early Confucian ethics, which relies heavily on the moral rules, scripts, and instructions of ritual (li 禮), is to provide an account of how best to deviate from ritual when unexpected circumstances demand that one must do so. Many commentators have explored ways in which the Confucian tradition can meet this challenge, and one particularly interesting line of response to it focuses on “mind-reading”—the ability to infer others’ mental states from their behavior. In this article, I introduce nunchi 눈치, a Korean word meaning a keen social awareness and facility in dynamic social situations, and make the case that it represents a key component in a full account of how to best deviate from ritual.

Keywords

Confucianism Ritual Social intelligence Nunchi 눈치 Confucian ethics 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

Acknowledgments

This essay has benefitted from discussions with Amy Olberding, Nancy Snow, Sula You, and Sungwoo Um. Parts of this essay have been improved by helpful comments from Michael Puett and questions from the audience at the Harvard East Asia Society Graduate Conference, as well as from questions from the audience and discussions at the International Society for Chinese Philosophy Conference in Singapore and comments from anonymous referees. This publication was made possible through the support of a grant from the John Templeton Foundation to the Institute for the Study of Human Flourishing at The University of Oklahoma. The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the John Templeton Foundation, the Institute for the Study of Human Flourishing, or The University of Oklahoma.

References

  1. Brennan, Samantha. 2016. “The Moral Status of Micro-Inequities: In Favor of Institutional Solutions.” In Implicit Bias and Philosophy, edited by Michael Brownstein and Jennifer Saul. Vol. 2. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Calhoun, Cheshire. 2000. “The Virtue of Civility.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 29.3: 251–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Choi, Sang-Chin, and Choi Soo-Hyang. 1992. “The Conceptualization of Korean Tact, Noon-Chi.” In Innovations in Cross-Cultural Psychology, edited by Iwawaki Saburo, Kashima Yoshihisa, and Leung Kwok. Berwyn, PA: Swets & Zeitlinger.Google Scholar
  4. Csikszentmihalyi, Mark. 2005. Material Virtue: Ethics and the Body in Early China. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
  5. Flanagan, Owen. 2017. The Geography of Morals: Varieties of Moral Possibility. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Hutton, Eric. 2002. “Moral Connoisseurship in Mengzi.” In Essays on the Moral Philosophy of Mengzi, edited by Liu Xiusheng and Phillip Ivanhoe. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing.Google Scholar
  7. ______, trans. 2014. Xunzi: The Complete Text. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Ivanhoe, Phillip. 2000. Confucian Moral Self-Cultivation. 2nd ed. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing.Google Scholar
  9. ______. 2011. “McDowell, Wang Yangming, and Mengzi’s Contributions to Understanding Moral Perception.” Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 10.3: 273–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Kalton, Michael. 1979. Korean Ideas and Values. Elkins Park, PA: Philip Jaisohn Memorial Foundation.Google Scholar
  11. Kim, Myeong-seok. 2010. “What Cèyǐn Zhī Xīn (Compassion/Familial Affection) Really Is.” Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 9.4: 407–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kupperman, Joel J. 1968. “Confucius and the Problem of Naturalness.” Philosophy East and West 18.3: 175–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lai, Karyn. 2006. “Li in the Analects: Training in Moral Competence and the Question of Flexibility.” Philosophy East and West 56.1: 69–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Martin, Samuel E., Lee Yang Ha, and Chang Sung-un. 1967. A Korean-English Dictionary. Yale Linguistic Series. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  15. McDowell, John. 1998. Mind, Values, and Reality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Olberding, Amy. 2015. “From Corpses to Courtesy: Xunzi and the Defense of Etiquette.” Journal of Value Inquiry 49: 145–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. ______. 2016. “Etiquette: A Confucian Contribution to Moral Philosophy.” Ethics 126.2: 422–446.Google Scholar
  18. Robinson, James. 1996. “Professional Communication in Korea: Playing Things by Eye.” IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication 39.3: 129–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Sarkissian, Hagop. 2010. “Confucius and the Effortless Life of Virtue.” History of Philosophy Quarterly 27.1: 1–16.Google Scholar
  20. Slingerland, Edward, trans. 2003. Analects. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing.Google Scholar
  21. Snow, Nancy. 2010. Virtue as Social Intelligence: An Empirically Grounded Theory. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  22. Stohr, Karen. 2012. On Manners. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  23. Van Norden, Bryan, trans. 2008. Mengzi. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing.Google Scholar
  24. Wiggins, David. 1998. Needs, Values, Truth. 3rd ed. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  25. Williams, Bernard. 1981. “Persons, Character, and Morality.” In Moral Luck, edited by James Rachels. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyUniversity of OklahomaNormanUSA

Personalised recommendations