Dao

pp 1–17 | Cite as

Tian as Cosmos in Zhu Xi’s Neo-Confucianism

Article
  • 3 Downloads

Abstract

Tian 天 is central to the metaphysics, cosmology, and ethics of the 800-year-long Chinese philosophical tradition we call “Neo-Confucianism,” but there is considerable confusion over what tian means—confusion which is exacerbated by its standard translation into English as “Heaven.” This essay analyzes the meaning of tian in the works of the most influential Neo-Confucian, Zhu Xi 朱熹 (1130–1200), presents a coherent interpretation that unifies the disparate aspects of the term’s meaning, and argues that “cosmos” does an excellent job of capturing this meaning and therefore should be adopted as our translation of tian.

Keywords

Metaphysics Ethics Tian 天 Cosmos Neo-Confucianism Zhu Xi 朱熹 Translation 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

Acknowledgments

I am grateful to comments from two anonymous reviewers that helped me to improve this essay, to Ben Huff for extensive comments on an earlier draft, and to Justin Tiwald for many conversations that have significantly shaped my understanding of Zhu Xi and of Neo-Confucianism more generally.

References

  1. Angle, Stephen C. 2009. Sagehood: The Contemporary Significance of Neo-Confucian Philosophy. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Angle, Stephen C., and Justin Tiwald. 2017. Neo-Confucianism: A Philosophical Introduction. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  3. Araki, Kengo 荒木見悟. 2008. Buddhism and Confucianism 佛教與儒教, trans. by Liao Zhaoheng 廖肇亨. Taipei 台北: Lianjing Chubanshe 聯經出版社.Google Scholar
  4. Baba, Eiho. 2015. “Li as Emergent Patterns of Qi: A Nonreductive Interpretation.” In Returning to Z hu Xi: Emerging Patterns within the Supreme Polarity, edited by David Jones and He Jinli. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  5. Barnes, Jonathan, ed. 1987. Early Greek Philosophy. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  6. Brandom, Robert. 1994. Making It Explicit: Reasoning, Representing, and Discursive Commitment. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Bruya, Brian. 2001. “Emotion, Desire, and Numismatic Experience in Rene Descartes, Zhu Xi, and Wang Yangming.” Ming Qing Yanjiu 10: 45–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chan, Wing-Tsit. 1989. Chu Hsi: New Studies. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.Google Scholar
  9. Ching, Julia. 2000. The Religious Thought of Chu Hsi. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Curd, Patricia. 2007. “Presocratic Philosophy.” The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2016 Edition), edited by Edward N. Zalta. http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2016/entries/presocratics/ (last accessed January 19, 2018).
  11. Graham, A. C. 1992. Two Chinese Philosophers: The Metaphysics of the Brothers Ch’eng. La Salle: Open Court.Google Scholar
  12. Graßhoff, Gerd. 2016. “Cosmology.” Brill’s New Pauly, edited by Hubert Cancik and Helmuth Schneider (Brill Online, 2016). http://referenceworks.brillonline.com/entries/brill-s-new-pauly/cosmology-e621140 (last accessed January 19, 2018).
  13. Hall, David L., and Roger T. Ames. 1987. Thinking Through Confucius. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  14. ______. 1995. Anticipating China: Thinking Through the Narratives of Chinese and Western Culture. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  15. ______. 1998. Thinking from the Han: Self, Truth, and Transcendence in Chinese and Western Culture. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  16. Huff, Benjamin. 2017. “Servants of Heaven: The Place of Virtue in the Confucian Cosmos.” International Communication of Chinese Culture 4.2: 271–298.Google Scholar
  17. Kim, Yung Sik. 2000. The Natural Philosophy of C hu Hsi, 1130–1200. Philadelphia: Memoirs of the American Philosophic Society.Google Scholar
  18. Liddell, Henry George, and Robert Scott. 1940. A Greek-English Lexicon, revised and augmented throughout by Sir Henry Stuart Jones, with the assistance of Roderick McKenzie. Oxford: Clarendon Press. http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/morph?l=kosme%2Fw&la=greek&can=kosme%2Fw0&d=Perseus:text:1999.04.0058:entry=kosme/w&i=1#lexicon (last accessed February 5, 2018).
  19. Neville, Robert Cummings. 1990. “Foreword.” In Rodney L. Taylor, The Religious Dimensions of Confucianism. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  20. Taylor, Rodney L. 1990. The Religious Dimensions of Confucianism. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  21. Thompson, Kirill O. 2015. “Opposition and Complementarity in Zhu Xi’s Thought.” In Returning to Z hu Xi: Emerging Patterns within the Supreme Polarity, edited by David Jones and He Jinli. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  22. Tillman, Hoyt Cleveland. 1987. “Consciousness of T’ien in Chu Hsi’s Thought.” Harvard Journal of Asiatic Studies 47.1: 31–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Tu, Wei-ming. 2001. “The Ecological Turn in New Confucian Humanism: Implications for China and the World.” Daedalus 130.4: 243–264.Google Scholar
  24. Tucker, Mary Evelyn. 2003. “Introduction.” In Confucian Spirituality, Volume One, edited by Tu Wei-ming and Mary Evelyn Tucker. New York: Crossroad Publishing Co.Google Scholar
  25. Walls, Laura Dassow. 2009. “Introducing Humboldt’s Cosmos.” Minding Nature 2.2: 3–15. http://www.humansandnature.org/introducing-humboldt-s-cosmos-article-26.php (last accessed January 18, 2018).
  26. Yu, Yamanoi. 1986. “The Great Ultimate and Heaven in Chu Hsi’s Philosophy.” In C hu Hsi and Neo-Confucianism, edited by Chan Wing-tsit. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.Google Scholar
  27. Zhu, Xi 朱熹. 2002a. Classified Conversations of Master Zhu 朱子語類. In Complete Works of Master Zhu 朱子全書. Shanghai 上海 and Hefei 合肥: Shanghai Guji Chubanshe 上海古籍出版社 and Anhui Jiaoyu Chubanshe 安徽教育出版社.Google Scholar
  28. ______. 2002b. Collected Writings of Z hu Xi 朱文公文集. In Complete Works of Master Zhu 朱子全書. Shanghai 上海 and Hefei 合肥: Shanghai Guji Chubanshe上海古籍出版社 and Anhui Jiaoyu Chubanshe 安徽教育出版社.Google Scholar
  29. ______. N.d. Collected Commentaries on the Mencius 孟子集註.Google Scholar
  30. Ziporyn, Brook. 2012. Ironies of Oneness and Difference: Coherence in Early Chinese Thought; Prolegomena to the Study of Li. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  31. ______. 2013. Beyond Oneness and Difference: Li and Coherence in Chinese Buddhist Thought and Its Antecedents. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Philosophy DepartmentWesleyan UniversityMiddletownUSA

Personalised recommendations