Advertisement

Predicting resilient modulus of recycled concrete and clay masonry blends for pavement applications using soft computing techniques

  • Mosbeh R. Kaloop
  • Alaa R. Gabr
  • Sherif M. El-Badawy
  • Ali Arisha
  • Sayed Shwally
  • Jong Wan HuEmail author
Research Article
  • 6 Downloads

Abstract

To date, very few researchers employed the Least Square Support Vector Machine (LSSVM) in predicting the resilient modulus (Mr) of Unbound Granular Materials (UGMs). This paper focused on the development of a LSSVM model to predict the Mr of recycled materials for pavement applications and comparison with other different models such as Regression, and Artificial Neural Network (ANN). Blends of Recycled Concrete Aggregate (RCA) with Recycled Clay Masonry (RCM) with proportions of 100/0, 90/10, 80/20, 70/30, 55/45, 40/60, 20/80, and 0/100 by the total aggregate mass were evaluated for use as UGMs. RCA/RCM materials were collected from dumps on the sides of roads around Mansoura city, Egypt. The investigated blends were evaluated experimentally by routine and advanced tests and the Mr values were determined by Repeated Load Triaxial Test (RLTT). Regression, ANN, and LSSVM models were utilized and compared in predicting the Mr of the investigated blends optimizing the best design model. Results showed that the Mr values of the investigated RCA/RCM blends were generally increased with the decrease in RCM proportion. Statistical analyses were utilized for evaluating the performance of the developed models and the inputs sensitivity parameters. Eventually, the results approved that the LSSVM model can be used as a novel tool to estimate the Mr of the investigated RCA/RCM blends.

Keywords

Least Square Support Vector Machine Artificial Neural Network resilient modulus Recycled Concrete Aggregate Recycled Clay Masonry 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

Acknowledgements

The first and corresponding author was supported by Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Science, ICT & Future Planning (2017R1A2B2010120).

References

  1. 1.
    Arisha A. Evaluation of recycled clay masonry blends in pavement construction. Thesis for the Master’s Degree. Mansoura: Mansoura University, 2017Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Arisha A, Gabr A, El-Badawy S, Shwally S. Using blends of construction & demolition waste materials and recycled clay masonry brick in pavement. Procedia Engineering, 2016, 143: 1317–1324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gabr A, Cameron D. Properties of recycled concrete aggregate for unbound pavement construction. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 2012, 24(6): 754–764CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Malešev M, Radonjanin V, Marinković S. Recycled concrete as aggregate for structural concrete production. Sustainability, 2010, 2(5): 1204–1225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cardoso R, Silva R V, Brito J, Dhir R. Use of recycled aggregates from construction and demolition waste in geotechnical applications: A literature review. Waste Management (New York), 2016, 49: 131–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Mousa E, Azam A, El-Shabrawy M, El-Badawy S. Laboratory characterization of reclaimed asphalt pavement for road construction in Egypt. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 2017, 44(6): 417–425CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Andrei D, Witczak M, Houston W. Resilient modulus predictive model for unbound pavement materials. In: International Foundation Congress and Equipment Expo 2009, 2009, 401–408Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ji R, Siddiki N, Nantung T, Kim D. Evaluation of resilient modulus of subgrade and base materials in Indiana and its implementation in MEPDG. The Scientific World Journal, 2014, 2014: 1–14Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    George K. Prediction of Resilient Modulus from Soils Index Proprieties. 2004Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lekarp F, Isacsson U, Dawson A. State of the art. I: Resilient response of unbound aggregates. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 2000, 126(1): 66–75Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Mousa R, Gabr A, Arab M, Azam A, El-Badawy S. Resilient modulus for unbound granular materials and subgrade soils in Egypt. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Advances in Sustainable Construction Materials & Civil Engineering Systems, 2017Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    AASHTO. Mechanistic-Empirical Pavement Design Guide: A Manual of Practice. Interim Edition, American Association of Highways and Transportation Officials. 2008Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kim S, Yang J, Jeong J. Prediction of subgrade resilient modulus using artificial neural network. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 2014, 18(5): 1372–1379CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Sadrossadat E, Heidaripanah A, Osouli S. Prediction of the resilient modulus of flexible pavement subgrade soils using adaptive neurofuzzy inference systems. Construction & Building Materials, 2016, 123: 235–247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Reza A, Rahrovan M. Application of artificial neural network to predict the resilient modulus of stabilized base subjected to wet dry cycles. Computations and Materials in Civil Engineering, 2016, 1(1): 37–47Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Zaman M, Solanki P, Ebrahimi A, White L. Neural network modeling of resilient modulus using routine subgrade soil properties. International Journal of Geomechanics, 2010, 10(1): 1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Elbagalati O, Elseifi M A, Gaspard K, Zhang Z. Development of an artificial neural network model to predict subgrade resilient modulus from continuous deflection testing. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 2017, 44(9): 700–706CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Solanki P, Zaman M, Ebrahimi A. Regression and artificial neural network modeling of resilient modulus of subgrade soils for pavement design applications. Intelligent and Soft Computing in Infrastructure Systems Engineering, 2009, 259: 269–304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Zuo R, Carranza E. Support vector machine: A tool for mapping mineral prospectivity. Computers & Geosciences, 2011, 37(12): 1967–1975CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    van Gestel T, Suykens J A K, Baesens B, Viaene S, Vanthienen J, Dedene G, de Moor B, Vandewalle J. Benchmarking least squares support vector machine classifiers. Machine Learning, 2004, 54(1): 5–32CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Samui P, Kothari D. Utilization of a least square support vector machine (LSSVM) for slope stability analysis. Scientia Iranica, 2011, 18(1): 53–58CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Suykens J, Vandewalle J. Least squares support vector machine classifiers. Neural Processing Letters, 1999, 9(3): 293–300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kaloop M, Hu J. Seismic response prediction of buildings with base isolation using advanced soft computing approaches. Advances in Materials Science and Engineering, 2017, 2017: 7942782CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Samui P, Das S, Sitharam T. Application of soft computing techniques to expansive soil characterization. In Intelligent and Soft Computing in Infrastructure Systems Engineering, 2009, 305–306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Fardad K, Najafi B, Ardabili S F, Mosavi A, Shamshirband S, Rabczuk T. Biodegradation of medicinal plants waste in an anaerobic digestion reactor for biogas production. Computer, Material and Continua, 2018, 55(3): 318–392Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Hamdia K M, Ghasemi H, Zhuang X, Alajlan N, Rabczuk T. Sensitivity and uncertainty analysis for flexoelectric nanostructures. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2018, 337: 95–109MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Hamdia K M, Silani M, Zhuang X, He P, Rabczuk T. Stochastic analysis of the fracture toughness of polymeric nanoparticle composites using polynomial chaos expansions. International Journal of Fracture, 2017, 206(2): 215–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Badawy M F, Msekh M A, Hamdia K M, Steiner M K, Lahmer T, Rabczuk T. Hybrid nonlinear surrogate models for fracture behavior of polymeric nanocomposites. Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics, 2017, 50: 64–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Gopalakrishnan K, Ceylan H, Attoh-Okine N. Intelligent and Soft Computing in Infrastructure Systems Engineering. 2009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    ECP. Egyptian Code of Practice for Urban and Rural Roads, Edition 1: Road Materials and Their Tests (Part Four). The Ministry of Housing, Utilities and Urban Communities, Egypt, 2008Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Brey T. A multi-parameter artificial neural network model to estimate macrobenthic invertebrate productivity and production. Limnology and Oceanography, Methods, 2012, 10(8): 581–589CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Norgaard M, Ravn O, Poulsen N K. NNSYSID-toolbox for system identification with neural networks. Mathematical and Computer Modelling of Dynamical Systems, 2002, 8(1): 1–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Samui P, Kim D, Aiyer B. Pullout capacity of small ground anchor: A least square support vector machine approach. Journal of Zhejiang University. Science A, 2015, 16(4): 295–301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Karimi S, Kisi O, Shiri J, Makarynskyy O, Shiril J, Makarynskyy O. A wavelet and neuro-fuzzy conjunction model to forecast air temperature variations at coastal sites. The International Journal of Ocean and Climate Systems, 2015, 6(4): 159–1721CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Arisha A, Gabr A, El-badawy S, Shwally S. Performance evaluation of construction and demolition waste materials for pavement construction in Egypt. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 2018, 30(2): 04017270CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mosbeh R. Kaloop
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  • Alaa R. Gabr
    • 3
  • Sherif M. El-Badawy
    • 3
  • Ali Arisha
    • 3
  • Sayed Shwally
    • 3
  • Jong Wan Hu
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of Civil and Environmental EngineeringIncheon National UniversityIncheonSouth Korea
  2. 2.Incheon Disaster Prevention Research CenterIncheon National UniversityIncheonSouth Korea
  3. 3.Department of Public Works and Civil EngineeringMansoura UniversityMansouraEgypt

Personalised recommendations