Advertisement

Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering

, Volume 13, Issue 6, pp 1316–1323 | Cite as

Investigating the influence of delamination on the stiffness of composite pipes under compressive transverse loading using cohesive zone method

  • Sattar MalekiEmail author
  • Roham RafieeEmail author
  • Abolfazl Hasannia
  • Mohammad Reza Habibagahi
Research Article
  • 31 Downloads

Abstract

The effect of delamination on the stiffness reduction of composite pipes is studied in this research. The stiffness test of filament wound composite pipes is simulated using cohesive zone method. The modeling is accomplished to study the effect of the geometrical parameters including delamination size and its position with respect to loading direction on stiffness of the composite pipes. At first, finite element results for stiffness test of a perfect pipe without delamination are validated with the experimental results according to ASTM D2412. It is seen that the finite element results agree well with experimental results. Then the finite element model is developed for composite pips with delaminated areas with different primary shapes. Thus, the effect of the size of delaminated region on longitudinal and tangential directions and also its orientation with respect to loading direction on delamination propagation and stiffness reduction of the pipes is assessed.

Keywords

delamination composite pipes stiffness test cohesive zone method 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Rabczuk T, Zi G, Bordas S, Nguyen-Xuan H. A simple and robust three-dimensional cracking-particle method without enrichment. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2010, 199(37-40): 2437–2455CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Rabczuk T, Belytschko T. Cracking particles: A simplified meshfree method for arbitrary evolving cracks. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 2004, 61(13): 2316–2343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Rabczuk T, Areias P M A, Belytschko T. A meshfree thin shell method for non-linear dynamic fracture. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 2007, 72(5): 524–548MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Rabczuk T, Belytschko T. A three-dimensional large deformation meshfree method for arbitrary evolving cracks. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2007, 196(29-30): 2777–2799MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Rabczuk T, Gracie R, Song J, Belytschko T. Immersed particle method for fluid-structure interaction. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 2010, 81(1): 48–71MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Rabczuk T, Bordas S, Zi G. On three-dimensional modelling of crack growth using partition of unity methods. Computers & Structures, 2010, 88(23-24): 1391–1411CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Areias P, Rabczuk T, Msekh M A. Phase-field analysis of finite-strain plates and shells including element subdivision. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2016, 312(C): 322–350MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Nguyen-Thanh N, Valizadeh N, Nguyen M N, Nguyen-Xuan H, Rabczuk T. An extended isogeometric thin shell analysis based on Kirchhoff-Love theory. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2015, 284: 265–291MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Areias P, Rabczuk T, Camanho P P. Finite strain fracture of 2D problems with injected anisotropic softening elements. Theoretical and Applied Fracture Mechanics, 2014, 72: 50–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Areiasae P, Rabczukb T, Dias-da-Costacd D. Element-wise fracture algorithm based on rotation of edges. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 2013, 110: 113–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Areias P, Rabczuk T. Finite strain fracture of plates and shells with configurational forces and edge rotations. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 2013, 94(12): 1099–1122MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Amiri F, Millan D, Shen Y, Rabczuk T, Arroyo M. Phase-field modeling of fracture in linear thin shells. Theoretical and Applied Fracture Mechanics, 2014, 69: 102–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Soteropoulos D, Fetfatsidis K A, Sherwood J A. Using Abaqus to model delamination in fiber reinforced composite materials. In: SIMULIA Community Conference, 2002Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Wang R G, Zhang L, Zhang J, Liu W B, He X D. Numerical analysis of delamination buckling and growth in slender laminated composite using cohesive element method. Computational Materials Science, 2010, 50(1): 20–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Standard AAN. Standard test method for determination of external loading characteristics of plastic/composite pipe by parallel/plate loading. ASTM-D2412, 2004Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Rafiee R, Habibagahi M R. On the stiffness prediction of GFRP pipes subjected to transverse loading. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 2018, 22(11): 4564–4572CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Blackman B R K, Hadavinia H, Kinlochand A J, Williams J G. The use of a cohesive zone model to study the fracture of fibre composites and adhesively bonded joints. International Journal of Fracture, 2003, 119: 25–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Alfano G. On the Influence of the shape of the interface law on the application of cohesive-zone models. Composites Science and Technology, 2006, 66: 723–730CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ouyang Z, Li G. Local damage evolution of double cantilever beam specimens during crack initiation process: A natural boundary condition based method. Journal of Applied Mechanic, 2009, 76(5): 051003Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hélénon F, Wisnom M R, Hallett S R, Trask R S. Numerical investigation into failure of laminated composite T-piece specimens under tensile loading. Composites. Part A, Applied Science and Manufacturing, 2012, 43(7): 1017–1027CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Rafiee R, Habibagahi M R. Evaluating mechanical performance of GFRP pipes subjected to transverse loading. Thin-walled Structures, 2018, 131: 347–359CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Camanho P P, Davila C G. Mixed-Mode Decohesion Finite Elements for The Simulation of Delamination in Composite Materials. NASA/TM-211737. 2002Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Alfano G, Crisfield M A. Finite element interface models for the delamination analysis of laminated composites: Mechanical and computational issues. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 2001, 50(7): 1701–1736CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Diniz Melo J D, Levy Neto F, de Araujo Barros G, de Almeida Mesquita F N. Mechanical behavior of GRP pressure pipes with addition of quartz sand filler. Journal of Composite Materials, 2011, 45(6): 717–726CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of EngineeringQuchan University of TechnologyQuchanIran
  2. 2.Composites Research Laboratory, Faculty of New Sciences and TechnologiesUniversity of TehranTehranIran

Personalised recommendations