Finite element analysis of controlled low strength materials

  • Vahid AlizadehEmail author
Research Article


Controlled low strength materials (CLSM) are flowable and self-compacting construction materials that have been used in a wide variety of applications. This paper describes the numerical modeling of CLSM fills with finite element method under compression loading and the bond performance of CLSM and steel rebar under pullout loading. The study was conducted using a plastic-damage model which captures the material behavior using both classical theory of elasto-plasticity and continuum damage mechanics. The capability of the finite element approach for the analysis of CLSM fills was assessed by a comparison with the experimental results from a laboratory compression test on CLSM cylinders and pullout tests. The analysis shows that the behavior of a CLSM fill while subject to a failure compression load or pullout tension load can be simulated in a reasonably accurate manner.


CLSM finite element method compressive strength pullout numerical modeling plastic damage model 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    ACI 229R. Controlled Low-Strength Materials. Farmington Hills, MI: American Concrete Institute, 2013Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Alizadeh V. The sustainable application of fly ash in bridge abutments. Geo-Chicago 2016: Sustainable Materials and Resource Conservation, Geotechnical Special Publication (GSP), 2016, 272: 159–166Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Najafi F T, Tia M. Use of accelerated flowable fill in pavement section. Final Report-Vol. 1. 2004Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Trejo D, Folliard K J, Du L. Sustainable development using controlled low-strength material. In: Proceedings of International Workshop on Sustainable Development and Concrete Technology, 2004, 231–250Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sheen Y N, Huang L J, Wang H Y, Le D H. Experimental study and strength formulation of soil-based controlled low-strength material containing stainless steel reducing slag. Construction & Building Materials, 2014, 54: 1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Schmitz M E, Parsons R L, Ramirez G, Zhao Y. Use of controlled low-strength material as abutment backfill. Report No. K-TRAN: KU-02-6. 2004Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Blanco A, Pujadas P, Cavalaro S, Aguado A. Methodology for the design of controlled low-strength materials application to the backfill of narrow trenches. Construction & Building Materials, 2014, 72: 23–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Amiri F, Anitescu C, Arroyo M, Bordas S P A, Rabczuk T. XLME interpolants, a seamless bridge between XFEM and enriched meshless methods. Computational Mechanics, 2014, 53(1): 45–57MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Areias P, Rabczuk T, Camanho P P. Finite strain fracture of 2D problems with injected anisotropic softening elements. Theoretical and Applied Fracture Mechanics, 2014, 72: 50–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Rabczuk T, Akkermann J, Eibl J. A numerical model for reinforced concrete structures. International Journal of Solids and Structures, 2005, 42(5–6): 1327–1354CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Rabczuk T, Belytschko T. A three-dimensional large deformation meshfree method for arbitrary evolving cracks. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2007, 196(29–30): 2777–2799MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Rabczuk T, Belytschko T. Application of particle methods to static fracture of reinforced concrete structures. International Journal of Fracture, 2006, 137(1–4): 19–49CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Rabczuk T, Belytschko T. Cracking particles: A simplified meshfree method for arbitrary evolving cracks. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 2004, 61(13): 2316–2343CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Rabczuk T, Zi G, Bordas S, Nguyen-Xuan H. A simple and robust three-dimensional cracking-particle method without enrichment. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2010, 199(37–40): 2437–2455CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Rabczuk T, Zi G, Bordas S, Nguyen-Xuan H. A geometrically non-linear three-dimensional cohesive crack method for reinforced concrete structures. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 2008, 75(16): 4740–4758CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Areias P, Msekh M A, Rabczuk T. Damage and fracture algorithm using the screened Poisson equation and local remeshing. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 2016, 158: 116–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Areias P, Rabczuk T, Dias-da-Costa D. Element-wise fracture algorithm based on rotation of edges. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 2013, 110: 113–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Areias P, Rabczuk T. Steiner-point free edge cutting of tetrahedral meshes with applications in fracture. Finite Elements in Analysis and Design, 2017, 132: 27–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ghorashi S Sh, Valizadeh N, Mohammadi S, Rabczuk T. T-spline based XIGA for fracture analysis of orthotropic media. Computers & Structures, 2015, 147: 138–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ren H, Zhuang X, Cai Y, Rabczuk T. Dual-horizon peridynamics. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 2016, 108(12): 1451–1476MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Ren H, Zhuang X, Rabczuk T. Dual-horizon peridynamics: A stable solution to varying horizons. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2017, 318: 762–782MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Abaqus analysis user’s manual. Dassault Systèmes, Version 6.14, 2014Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    ASTM D4832. Standard Test Method for Preparation and Testing of Controlled Low Strength Material (CLSM) Test Cylinders. West Conshohocken, PA: American Society for Testing and Materials, 2010Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Lubliner J, Oliver J, Oller S, Oñate E. A plastic-damage model for concrete. International Journal of Solids and Structures, 1989, 25(3): 299–326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Lee J, Fenves G. Plastic-damage model for cyclic loading of concrete structures. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 1998, 124(8): 892–900CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Jankowiak T, Tomasz L. Identification of parameters of concrete damaged plasticity constitutive model. Foundations of Civil and Environmental Engineering, 2005, 6: 53–69Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Mindess S, Young J F, Darwin D. Concrete. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education Inc., 2003Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Hillerborg A, Modéer M, Petersson P E. Analysis of crack formation and crack growth in concrete by means of fracture mechanics and finite elements. Cement and Concrete Research, 1976, 6(6): 773–781CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Gildart Haase School of Computer Sciences & EngineeringFairleigh Dickinson UniversityTeaneckUSA

Personalised recommendations