Advertisement

Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering

, Volume 13, Issue 5, pp 1138–1149 | Cite as

Behavior and strength of headed stud shear connectors in ultra-high performance concrete of composite bridges

  • Jianan QiEmail author
  • Yuqing Hu
  • Jingquan Wang
  • Wenchao Li
Research Article
  • 18 Downloads

Abstract

This study presents an experimental and numerical investigation on the static behavior of headed stud shear connectors in ultra-high performance concrete (UHPC) of composite bridges. Four push-out specimens were tested. It was found that no cracking, crushing or splitting was observed on the concrete slab, indicating that UHPC slab exhibited good performance and could resist the high force transferred from the headed studs. The numerical and experimental results indicated that the shear capacity is supposed to be composed of two parts stud shank shear contribution and concrete wedge block shear contribution. The stiffness increment of a stud in UHPC was at least 60% higher than that in normal strength concrete. Even if the stud height was reduced from 6d to 2d, there was no reduction in the shear strength of a stud. Short stud shear connectors with an aspect ratio as small as 2 could develop full strength in UHPC slabs. An empirical load-slip equation taking into account stud diameter was proposed to predict the load-slip response of a stud. The reliability and accuracy of the proposed load-slip equation was verified by the experimental and numerical load-slip curves.

Keywords

ultra-high performance concrete studs shear strength FE analysis push-out test 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by the National Key R&D Plan (2017YFC07034) and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (2242019K40073). The financial supports are gratefully appreciated.

References

  1. 1.
    Nie J G, Cai C S. Steel-concrete composite beams considering shear slip effects. Journal of Structural Engineering, 2003, 129(4): 495–506Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Xue W, Ding M, Wang H, Luo Z. Static behavior and theoretical model of stud shear connectors. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 2008, 13(6): 623–634Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Qi J, Wang J, Li M, Chen L. Shear capacity of stud shear connectors with initial damage: Experiment, FEM model and theoretical formulation. Steel and Composite Structures, 2017, 25(1): 79–92Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Viest I M. Investigation of stud shear connectors for composite concrete and steel T-beams. ACI Journal, 1956, 27(8): 875–892Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Oehlers D J. Deterioration in strength of stud connectors in composite bridge beams. Journal of Structural Engineering, 1990, 116(12): 3417–3431Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Huo J, Wang H, Zhu Z, Liu Y, Zhong Q. Experimental study on impact behavior of stud shear connectors between concrete slab and steel beam. Journal of Structural Engineering, 2018, 144(2): 04017203Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Xu C, Sugiura K. Parametric push-out analysis on group studs shear connector under effect of bending-induced concrete cracks. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2013, 89: 86–97Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Qi J, Ding X, Wang Z, Hu Y. Shear strength of fiber-reinforced high-strength steel ultra-high-performance concrete beams based on refined calculation of compression zone depth considering concrete tension. Advances in Structural Engineering, 2019, doi:  https://doi.org/10.1177/1369433219829805
  9. 9.
    Wang J, Qi J, Tong T, Xu Q, Xiu H. Static behavior of large stud shear connectors in steel-UHPC composite structures. Engineering Structures, 2019, 178: 534–542Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kim J S, Kwark J, Joh C, Yoo S W, Lee K C. Headed stud shear connector for thin ultrahigh-performance concrete bridge deck. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2015, 108: 23–30Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Qi J, Wang J, Ma Z J. Flexural response of high-strength steel-ultra-high-performance fiber reinforced concrete beams based on a mesoscale constitutive model: Experiment and theory. Structural Concrete, 2018, 19(3): 719–734Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Qi J, MaZ J, Wang J. Shear strength of UHPFRC beams: Mesoscale fiber-matrix discrete model. Journal of Structural Engineering, 2017, 143(4): 04016209Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Qi J, Wu Z, Ma Z J, Wang J. Pullout behavior of straight and hooked-end steel fibers in UHPC matrix with various embedded angles. Construction & Building Materials, 2018, 191: 764–774Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Qi J, Ma Z J, Wang J, Liu T. Post-cracking shear strength and deformability of HSS-UHPFRC beams. Structural Concrete, 2016, 17(6): 1033–1046Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Rabczuk T, Belytschko T. Cracking particles: a simplified mesh free method for arbitrary evolving cracks. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 2004, 61(13): 2316–2343zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Rabczuk T, Bordas S, Zi G. On three-dimensional modelling of crack growth using partition of unity methods. Computers & Structures, 2010, 88(23–24): 1391–1411Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Rabczuk T, Zi G, Bordas S, Nguyen-Xuan H. A geometrically nonlinear three-dimensional cohesive crack method for reinforced concrete structures. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 2008, 75(16): 4740–4758Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Rauscher S, Hegger J. Modern composite structures made of high performance materials. In: The 2008 Composite Construction in Steel and Concrete Conference VI American Society of Civil Engineers, 2008, 691–702Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kang J Y, Park J S, Jung W T, Keum M S. Evaluation of the shear strength of perfobond rib connectors in ultra high performance concrete. Engineering, 2014, 6(13): 989–999Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Luo Y, Hoki K, Hayashi K, Nakashima M. Behavior and strength of headed stud-SFRCC shear connection. I: Experimental study. Journal of Structural Engineering, 2016, 142(2): 04015112Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Cao J, Shao X, Deng L, Gan Y. Static and fatigue behavior of short-headed studs embedded in a thin ultrahigh-performance concrete layer. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 2017, 22(5): 04017005Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Wang J, Guo J, Jia L, Chen S, Dong Y. Push-out tests of demountable headed stud shear connectors in steel-UHPC composite structures. Composite Structures, 2017, 170: 69–79Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Liu J, Han F, Cui G, Zhang Q, Lv J, Zhang L, Yang Z. Combined effect of coarse aggregate and fiber on tensile behavior of ultra-high performance concrete. Construction & Building Materials, 2016, 121:310–318Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    GB/T11263-2010. Hot rolled H and cut T section steel. Beijing, China, 2010Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    ECS (European Committee for Standardization). Eurocode 4: Design of composite steel and concrete structures, part 1–1: General rues and rules for buildings (EN 1994-1-1). Brussels, Belgium, 2005Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    AASHTO. AASHTO LRFD bridge design specifications. Washington D.C., 2014Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    GB50017-2003.Code for design of steel structures. Beijing, China, 2003Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    An L, Cederwall K. Push-out tests on studs in high strength and normal strength concrete. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 1996, 36(1): 15–29Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Hegger J, Sedlacek G, Döinghaus P, Trumpf H, Eligehausen R. Studies on the ductility of shear connectors when using high-strength steel and high-strength concrete. International symposium on connections between steel and concrete, 2001, 1025–1045Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Doinghaus P, Goralski C, Will N. Design rules for composite structures with high performance steel and high performance concrete. High Performance Materials in Bridges. Proceedings of the International Conference United Engineering Foundation, 2003, 139–149Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Luo Y, Hoki K, Hayashi K, Nakashima M. Behavior and strength of headed stud-SFRCC shear connection. II: Strength evaluation. Journal of Structural Engineering, 2016, 142(2): 04015113Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    GB/T 10433-2002. Cheese head studs for arc stud welding. Beijing, China, 2002Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Johnson R P, May I M. Partial-interaction design of composite beams. Structural Engineer, 1975, 8(53): 305–311Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    JSSC (Japan Society of Civil Engineers). Guidelines for performance-based design of steel-concrete hybrid structures. Tokyo, 2002Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Ollgaard J G, Slutter R G, Fisher J W. Shear strength of stud connectors in lightweight and normal-weight concrete. Engineering Journal (New York), 1971, 8(2): 55–64Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Buttry K E. Behavior of stud shear connectors in lightweight and normal-weight concrete. Thesis for the Master’s Degree, University of Missouri, Rolla, 1965Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Vu-Bac N, Lahmer T, Zhuang X, Nguyen-Thoi T, Rabczuk T. A software framework for probabilistic sensitivity analysis for computationally expensive models. Advances in Engineering Software, 2016, 100: 19–31Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Hamdia K M, Ghasemi H, Zhuang X, Alajlan N, Rabczuk T. Sensitivity and uncertainty analysis for flexoelectric nanostructures. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2018, 337: 95–109MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Hamdia K M, Silani M, Zhuang X, He P, Rabczuk T. Stochastic analysis of the fracture toughness of polymeric nanoparticle composites using polynomial chaos expansions. International Journal of Fracture, 2017, 206(2): 215–227Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    ECS (European Committee for Standardization). Eurocode 2: Design of concrete structures-Part 1–1: General rules and rules for buildings (EN 1992-1-1). Brussels, Belgium, 2004Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Xu C, Sugiura K, Wu C, Su Q. Parametrical static analysis on group studs with typical push-out tests. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2012, 72: 84–96Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jianan Qi
    • 1
    Email author
  • Yuqing Hu
    • 1
  • Jingquan Wang
    • 1
  • Wenchao Li
    • 1
  1. 1.Key Laboratory of Concrete and Prestressed Concrete Structures of the Ministry of Education, School of Civil EngineeringSoutheast UniversityNanjingChina

Personalised recommendations