An investigation of ballistic response of reinforced and sandwich concrete panels using computational techniques
- 58 Downloads
Structural performance of nuclear containment structures and power plant facilities is of critical importance for public safety. The performance of concrete in a high-speed hard projectile impact is a complex problem due to a combination of multiple failure modes including brittle tensile fracture, crushing, and spalling. In this study, reinforced concrete (RC) and steel-concrete-steel sandwich (SCSS) panels are investigated under high-speed hard projectile impact. Two modeling techniques, smoothed particle hydrodynamics (SPH) and conventional finite element (FE) analysis with element erosion are used. Penetration depth and global deformation are compared between doubly RC and SCSS panels in order to identify the advantages of the presence of steel plates over the reinforcement layers. A parametric analysis of the front and rear plate thicknesses of the SCSS configuration showed that the SCSS panel with a thick front plate has the best performance in controlling the hard projectile. While a thick rear plate is effective in the case of a large and soft projectile as the plate reduces the rear deformation. The effects of the impact angle and impact velocity are also considered. It was observed that the impact angle for the flat nose missile is critical and the front steel plate is effective in minimizing penetration depth.
Keywordsconcrete panels projectile impact finite element modeling smoothed particle hydrodynamics strain rate effect
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
The financial support for this project was provided by the United States Department of Energy through the Nuclear Energy University Program under Contract No. 00128931. The findings presented herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the sponsor.
- 28.Dassault Systemes. ABAQUS, 6.14, Simulia Corp., Providence, RI, USA, 2016Google Scholar
- 29.Hibbitt H D, Karlsson B I, Sorensen E P. ABAQUS User’s & Theory Manuals, 6.14, Dassault Systèmes Simulia Corp., Providence, RI, USA, 2013Google Scholar
- 31.Malvar L J. Review of static and dynamic properties of steel reinforcing bars. Materials Journal, 1998, 95(5): 609–616Google Scholar
- 33.Ross C A, Tedesco J W, Kuennen S T. Effects of strain rate on concrete strength. Materials Journal, 1995, 92(1): 37–47Google Scholar
- 34.Leppänen J. Concrete Structures Subjected to Fragment Impacts. Goteborg: Chalmers University of Technology, 2004Google Scholar
- 36.CEB-FIP. Design of Concrete Structures. Euro-International Committee for Concrete (CEB). Lausanne, Switzerland, 1993Google Scholar
- 37.UFC. Unified facilities criteria (UFC), structures to resist the effects of accidental explosions, UFC 3-340-02. U.S. Department of Defence, 2008Google Scholar
- 38.Kupfer H, Hilsdorf H K, Rusch H. Behavior of concrete under biaxial stresses. ACI Journal Proceedings, 1969, 66(8): 656–666Google Scholar
- 39.Kupfer H B, Gerstle K H. Behavior of concrete under biaxial stresses. Journal of the Engineering Mechanics Division, 1973, 99(4): 853–866Google Scholar
- 42.Jankowiak T, Lodygowski T. Identification of parameters of concrete damage plasticity constitutive model. Foundations of civil and environmental engineering, 2005, 6(1): 53–69Google Scholar
- 43.Hognestad E. Study of Combined Bending and Axial Load in Reinforced Concrete Members. Urbana: University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign, 1951Google Scholar
- 46.Cowper G R, Symonds P S. Strain-hardening and Strain-rate Effects in the Impact Loading of Cantilever Beams. DTIC Document, 1957Google Scholar
- 47.Malvar L J, Crawford J E. Dynamic increase factors for steel reinforcing bars. In: 28th DDESB Seminar, Orlando, USA, 1998Google Scholar
- 48.ASTM. Standard Specification for Carbon Structural Steel, A36/A36M. West Conshohocken: ASTM International, 2014Google Scholar
- 49.ASTM. Standard Specification for Deformed and Plain Carbon-Steel Bars for Concrete Reinforcement, ASTM A615/A615M-16. West Conshohocken: ASTM International, 2016Google Scholar
- 50.Kawamoto Y, Stepan J. Analytical Study of Reinforced Concrete Slab Subjected to Soft Missile Impact. SMiRT-23, Manchester, UK, 2015Google Scholar
- 51.Rodríguez Soler J, Martinez Cutillas F J, Marti Rodriguez J. Concrete constitutive model, calibration and applications. In: SIMULIA Community Conference, Vienna, Austria, 2013Google Scholar
- 53.Kar A K. Local effects of tornado-generated missiles. Journal of the Structural Division, 1978, 104(5): 809–816Google Scholar