Advertisement

An investigation into the properties of ternary and binary cement pastes containing glass powder

  • Marcelo Frota Bazhuni
  • Mahsa Kamali
  • Ali Ghahremaninezhad
Research Article
  • 15 Downloads

Abstract

The properties of binary and ternary cement pastes containing glass powder (GP) were examined. Hydration at early age was evaluated using semi-adiabatic calorimetry and at late ages using non-evaporable water content and thermogravimetric analysis. The transport characteristic was assessed by measuring electrical resistivity. The binary paste with slag showed the highest hydration activity compared to the binary pastes with GP and fly ash (FA). The results indicated that the pozzolanic behavior of the binary paste with GP was less than that of the binary pastes with slag or FA at late ages. An increase in the electrical resistivity and compressive strength of the binary paste with GP compared to other modified pastes at late ages was observed. It was shown that GP tends to increase the drying shrinkage of the pastes. Ternary pastes containing GP did not exhibit synergistic enhancements compared to the respective binary pastes.

Keywords

cement paste glass powder pozzolanic reaction supplementary cementitious material 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

Acknowledgements

Slag used in the experiments was provided as a gift by Lehigh. The authors wish to thank Jessica Flores for performing the drying shrinkage measurements.

References

  1. 1.
    World Energy Council. Efficient Use of Energy Utilizing High Technology: An Assessment of Energy Use in Industry and Building. London: World Energy Council, 1995Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    EPA (Environmental Protection Agency). Available and Emerging Technologies for Reducing Greenhouse Gas Emissions from the Portland Cement Industry. Washington D.C.: EPA (Environmental Protection Agency), 2010Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    USGS (US Geological Survey). Background Facts and Issues Concerning Cement and Cement Data. Reston: USGS (US Geological Survey), 2005Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Wedding P A, Dunstan E. The effect of fly ash on concrete alkaliaggregate reaction. Cement, Concrete and Aggregates, 1981, 3(2): 4Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kizhakkumodom V H, Rangaraju P R. Decoupling the effects of chemical composition and fineness of fly ash in mitigating alkalisilica reaction. Cement and Concrete Composites, 2013, 43: 54–68Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Harish K, Rangaraju P. Effect of blended fly ashes in mitigating alkali-silica reaction. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2011, 2240(1): 80–88Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Shehata M H, Thomas M D. The effect of fly ash composition on the expansion of concrete due to alkali-silica reaction. Cement and Concrete Research, 2000, 30(7): 1063–1072Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lumley J S. The ASR expansion of concrete prisms made from cements partially replaced by ground granulated blastfurnace slag. Construction & Building Materials, 1993, 7(2): 95–99Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hester D, McNally C, Richardson M. A study of the influence of slag alkali level on the alkali-silica reactivity of slag concrete. Construction & Building Materials, 2005, 19(9): 661–665Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Beglarigale A, Yazici H. Mitigation of detrimental effects of alkalisilica reaction in cement-based composites by combination of steel microfibers and ground-granulated blast-furnace slag. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 2014, 26(12): 04014091Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gopinathan S, Anand K B. Properties of cement grout modified with ultra-fine slag. Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering, 2017, 12(1): 1–9Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kamali M, Ghahremaninezhad A. Effect of glass powders on the mechanical and durability properties of cementitious materials. Construction & Building Materials, 2015, 98: 407–416Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Flores J, Kamali M, Ghahremaninezhad A. An investigation into the properties and microstructure of cement mixtures modified with cellulose nanocrystal. Materials (Basel), 2017, 10: 1–16Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kamali M, Ghahremaninezhad A. An investigation into the influence of superabsorbent polymers on the properties of glass powder modified cement pastes. Construction & Building Materials, 2017, 149: 236–247Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Shao Y, Lefort T, Moras S, Rodriguez D. Studies on concrete containing ground waste glass. Cement and Concrete Research, 2000, 30(1): 91–100Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Dyer T D, Dhir R K. Chemical reactions of glass cullets used as cement component. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 2001, 13(6): 412–417Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Wang Z, Shi C, Song J. Effect of glass powder on chloride ion transport and alkali-aggregate reaction expansion of lightweight aggregate concrete. J. Wuhan Univ. Technol. Sci. Ed., 2009, 24(2): 312–317Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Schwarz N, Cam H, Neithalath N. Influence of a fine glass powder on the durability characteristics of concrete and its comparison to fly ash. Cement and Concrete Composites, 2008, 30(6): 486–496Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Nassar R U D, Soroushian P. Green and durable mortar produced with milled waste glass. Magazine of Concrete Research, 2012, 64 (7): 605–615Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Nassar R U D, Soroushian P. Strength and durability of recycled aggregate concrete containing milled glass as partial replacement for cement. Construction & Building Materials, 2012, 29: 368–377Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Pettersson K. Effects of silica fume on alkali-silica expansion in mortar specimens. Cement and Concrete Research, 1992, 22(1): 15–22Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Boddy A M, Hooton R D, Thomas M D A. The effect of the silica content of silica fume on its ability to control alkali–silica reaction. Cement and Concrete Research, 2003, 33(8): 1263–1268Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Mohamed O A, Najm O F. Compressive strength and stability of sustainable self-consolidating concrete containing fly ash, silica fume, and GGBS. Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering, 2017, 11(4): 406–411Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Aquino W, Lange D, Olek J. The influence of metakaolin and silica fume on the chemistry of alkali-silica reaction products. Cement and Concrete Composites, 2001, 23(6): 485–493Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Ramlochan T, Thomas M, Gruber K A. The effect of metakaolin on alkali-silica reaction in concrete. Cement and Concrete Research, 2000, 30(3): 339–344Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Bagheri A R, Zanganeh H, Moalemi M M. Mechanical and durability properties of ternary concretes containing silica fume and low reactivity blast furnace slag. Cement and Concrete Composites, 2012, 34(5): 663–670Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Radlinski M, Olek J. Investigation into the synergistic effects in ternary cementitious systems containing portland cement, fly ash and silica fume. Cement and Concrete Composites, 2012, 34(4): 451–459Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Antiohos S, Maganari K, Tsimas S. Evaluation of blends of high and low calcium fly ashes for use as supplementary cementing materials. Cement and Concrete Composites, 2005, 27(3): 349–356Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Erdem T K, Kirca Ö. Use of binary and ternary blends in high strength concrete. Construction & Building Materials, 2008, 22(7): 1477–1483Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Gesolu M, Güneyisi E, Özbay E. Properties of self-compacting concretes made with binary, ternary, and quaternary cementitious blends of fly ash, blast furnace slag, and silica fume. Construction & Building Materials, 2009, 23(5): 1847–1854Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Sharfuddin Ahmed M, Kayali O, Anderson W. Chloride penetration in binary and ternary blended cement concretes as measured by two different rapid methods. Cement and Concrete Composites, 2008, 30(7): 576–582Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Bleszynski R, Hooton R D, Thomas M D A, Rogers C A. Durability of ternary blend concrete with silica fume and blast-furnace slag: Laboratory and outdoor exposure site studies. ACI Materials Journal, 2002, 99: 499–508Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Jeong Y, Park H, Jun Y, Jeong J H, Oh J E. Microstructural verification of the strength performance of ternary blended cement systems with high volumes of fly ash and GGBFS. Construction & Building Materials, 2015, 95: 96–107Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Afshinnia K, Rangaraju P R. Efficiency of ternary blends containing fine glass powder in mitigating alkali-silica reaction. Construction & Building Materials, 2015, 100: 234–245Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Shayan A, Xu A. Value-added utilisation of waste glass in concrete. Cement and Concrete Research, 2004, 34(1): 81–89Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Jain J A, Neithalath N. Chloride transport in fly ash and glass powder modified concretes–Influence of test methods on microstructure. Cement and Concrete Composites, 2010, 32(2): 148–156Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Schwarz N, Neithalath N. Influence of a fine glass powder on cement hydration: Comparison to fly ash and modeling the degree of hydration. Cement and Concrete Research, 2008, 38(4): 429–436Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Neithalath N, Persun J, Hossain A. Hydration in high-performance cementitious systems containing vitreous calcium aluminosilicate or silica fume. Cement and Concrete Research, 2009, 39(6): 473–481Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Vaitkevicius V, Šerelis E, Hilbig H. The effect of glass powder on the microstructure of ultra high performance concrete. Construction & Building Materials, 2014, 68: 102–109Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Neithalath N, Weiss J, Olek J. Characterizing enhanced porosity concrete using electrical impedance to predict acoustic and hydraulic performance. Cement and Concrete Research, 2006, 36 (11): 2074–2085Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Lothenbach B, Scrivener K, Hooton R D. Supplementary cementitious materials. Cement and Concrete Research, 2011, 41 (12): 1244–1256Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Ylmén R, Jäglid U. Carbonation of Portland cement studied by diffuse reflection Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy. Int. J. Concr. Struct. Mater., 2013, 7(2): 119–125Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Ylmén R, Jäglid U, Steenari B M, Panas I. Early hydration and setting of Portland cement monitored by IR, SEM and Vicat techniques. Cement and Concrete Research, 2009, 39(5): 433–439Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Horgnies M, Chen J J, Bouillon C. Overview about the use of Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy to study cementitious materials. Mater. Characterisation VI Comput. Methods Exp., 2013, 77: 251–262Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Kamali M, Ghahremaninezhad A. Investigating the hydration and microstructure of cement pastes modified with glass powders. Construction & Building Materials, 2016, 112: 915–924Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Shafaatian S M H, Akhavan A, Maraghechi H, Rajabipour F. How does fly ash mitigate alkali-silica reaction (ASR) in accelerated mortar bar test (ASTM C1567). Cement and Concrete Composites, 2013, 37: 143–153Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Thomas M. The effect of supplementary cementing materials on alkali-silica reaction: A review. Cement and Concrete Research, 2011, 41(12): 1224–1231Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Yuan J, Lindquist W, Darwin D, Browning J. Effect of slag cement on drying shrinkage of concrete. Aci Materials Journal, 2015, 112 (2): 267–276Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Shayan A, Xu A. Performance of glass powder as a pozzolanic material in concrete: A field trial on concrete slabs. Cement and Concrete Research, 2006, 36(3): 457–468Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Sharifi Y, Afshoon I, Firoozjaei Z, Momeni A. Utilization of waste glass micro-particles in producing self-consolidating concrete mixtures. Int. J. Concr. Struct. Mater., 2016, 10(3): 337–353Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Kara P. Performance of waste glass powder (WGP) supplementary cementitious material (SCM)–Drying shrinkage and early age shrinkage cracking. J. Silic. Based Compos. Mater., 2014, 66: 18–22Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Hu X, Shi Z, Shi C, Wu Z, Tong B, Ou Z, de Schutter G. Drying shrinkage and cracking resistance of concrete made with ternary cementitious components. Construction & Building Materials, 2017, 149: 406–415Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marcelo Frota Bazhuni
    • 1
  • Mahsa Kamali
    • 1
  • Ali Ghahremaninezhad
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Civil, Architectural and Environmental EngineeringUniversity of MiamiCoral GablesUSA

Personalised recommendations