Advertisement

Determination of shear strength of steel fiber RC beams: application of data-intelligence models

  • Abeer A. Al-MusawiEmail author
Research Article

Abstract

Accurate prediction of shear strength of structural engineering components can yield a magnificent information modeling and predesign process. This paper aims to determine the shear strength of steel fiber reinforced concrete beams using the application of data-intelligence models namely hybrid artificial neural network integrated with particle swarm optimization. For the considered data-intelligence models, the input matrix attribute is one of the central element in attaining accurate predictive model. Hence, various input attributes are constructed to model the shear strength “as a targeted variable”. The modeling is initiated using historical published researches steel fiber reinforced concrete beams information. Seven variables are used as input attribute combination including reinforcement ratio (ρ%), concrete compressive strength (fc), fiber factor (F1), volume percentage of fiber (Vf), fiber length to diameter ratio (lf =ld) effective depth (d), and shear span-to-strength ratio (a/d), while the shear strength (Ss) is the output of the matrix. The best network structure obtained using the network having ten nodes and one hidden layer. The final results obtained indicated that the hybrid predictive model of ANN-PSO can be used efficiently in the prediction of the shear strength of fiber reinforced concrete beams. In more representable details, the hybrid model attained the values of root mean square error and correlation coefficient 0.567 and 0.82, respectively.

Keywords

hybrid intelligence model shear strength prediction steel fiber reinforced concrete 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Zollo R F. Fiber-reinforced concrete: an overview after 30 years of development. Cement and Concrete Composites, 1997, 19(2): 107–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Park K, Paulino G H, Roesler J. Cohesive fracture model for functionally graded fiber reinforced concrete. Cement and Concrete Research, 2010, 40(6): 956–965CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Park S H, Kim D J, Ryu G S, Koh K T. Tensile behavior of ultra high performance hybrid fiber reinforced concrete. Cement and Concrete Composites, 2012, 34(2): 172–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Graybeal B A. Compressive behavior of ultra-high-performance fiber-reinforced concrete. ACI Materials Journal, 2007, 104(2): 146–152Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Pantelides C P, Garfield T T, Richins W D, Larson T K, Blakeley J E. Reinforced concrete and fiber reinforced concrete panels subjected to blast detonations and post-blast static tests. Engineering Structures, 2014, 76: 24–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Wang H, Belarbi A. Ductility characteristics of fiber-reinforced-concrete beams reinforced with FRP rebars. Construction & Building Materials, 2011, 25(5): 2391–2401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Brewka G. Artificial intelligence—a modern approach by Stuart Russell and Peter Norvig, Prentice Hall. Series in Artificial Intelligence, Englewood Cliffs, NJ. Knowledge Engineering Review, 1996, 11(1): 78Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lu P, Chen S, Zheng Y. Artificial intelligence in civil engineering. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2012, 2012: 1–22Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Rzevski G. Artificial intelligence in engineering: past, present and future. Artificial Intelligence in Engineering, 1995, X(July): 1–14Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Brunette E S, Flemmer R C, Flemmer C L. A review of artificial intelligence. ICARA 2009-Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Autonomous Robots and Agents, 2009, 385–392Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Pao Y H. Engineering artificial intelligence. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 1988, 1(1): 5–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    El-Sayed A, El-Salakawy E, Benmokrane B. Shear strength of oneway concrete slabs reinforced with fiber-reinforced polymer composite bars. Journal of Composites for Construction, 2005, 9 (2): 147–157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ince R. Prediction of fracture parameters of concrete by artificial neural networks. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 2004, 71(15): 2143–2159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Oreta A W C, Kawashima K. Neural network modeling of confined compressive strength and strain of circular concrete columns. Journal of Structural Engineering, 2003, 129(4): 554–561CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Khademi F, Akbari M, Jamal S M, Nikoo M. Multiple linear regression, artificial neural network, and fuzzy logic prediction of 28 days compressive strength of concrete. Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering, 2017, 11(1): 90–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Vu-Bac N, Duong T X, Lahmer T, Zhuang X, Sauer R A, Park H S, Rabczuk T. A NURBS-based inverse analysis for reconstruction of nonlinear deformations of thin shell structures. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2018, 331: 427–455MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    González-Fonteboa B, Martínez-Abella F. Shear strength of recycled concrete beams. Construction & Building Materials, 2007, 21(4): 887–893CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kahn L F, Mitchell A D. Shear friction tests with high-strength concrete. ACI Structural Journal, 2002, 99(1): 98–103Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Yaseen ZM, El-Shafie A, Afan H A, Hameed M, MohtarWHMW, Hussain A. RBFNN versus FFNN for daily river flow forecasting at Johor River, Malaysia. Neural Computing & Applications, 2015, doi: 10.1007/s00521-015-1952-6Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Lee J, Almond D, Harris B. The use of neural networks for the prediction of fatigue lives of composite materials. Composites. Part A, Applied Science and Manufacturing, 1999, 30(10): 1159–1169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Premalatha K, Natarajan A M. Hybrid PSO and GA for global maximization. Int J Open Problems Compt Math, 2009, 2(4): 597–608MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Hoballah A, Erlich I. PSO-ANN approach for transient stability constrained economic power generation. 2009 IEEE Bucharest PowerTech: Innovative Ideas Toward the Electrical Grid of the Future, 2009Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Zhao H S, Jin L, Huang X Y. A prediction of the monthly precipitation model based on PSO-ANN and its applications. 3rd International Joint Conference on Computational Sciences and Optimization, CSO 2010: Theoretical Development and Engineering Practice, 2010, 476–479Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Yi D, Ge X. An improved PSO-based ANN with simulated annealing technique. Neurocomputing, 2005, 63: 527–533CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Abdullah A G, Suranegara G M, Hakim D L. Hybrid PSO-ANN application for improved accuracy of short term Load Forecasting. WSEAS Transactions on Power Systems, 2014, 9: 446–451Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Hasanipanah M, Noorian-Bidgoli M, Jahed Armaghani D, Khamesi H. Feasibility of PSO-ANN model for predicting surface settlement caused by tunneling. Engineering with Computers, 2016, 32(4): 705–715CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Rukhaiyar S, Alam M N, Samadhiya N K. A PSO-ANN hybrid model for predicting factor of safety of slope. International Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2017, doi: 10.1080/19386362.2017.1305652Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Li J, Wang J. Research of steel plate temperature prediction based on the improved PSO-ANN algorithm for roller hearth normalizing furnace. Proceedings of the World Congress on Intelligent Control and Automation (WCICA), 2010, 2464–2469Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Vu-Bac N, Lahmer T, Zhuang X, Nguyen-Thoi T, Rabczuk T. A software framework for probabilistic sensitivity analysis for computationally expensive models. Advances in Engineering Software, 2016, 100: 19–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Li V C, Ward R, Hamza A M. Steel and synthetic fibers as shear reinforcement. ACI Materials Journal, 1992, 89(5): 499–508Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Mansur M A, Ong K C G, Paramasivam P. Shear strength of fibrous concrete beams without stirrups. Journal of Structural Engineering, 1986, 112(9): 2066–2079CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Tan K H, Murugappan K, Paramasivam P. Shear behavior of steel fiber reinforced concrete beams. ACI Structural Journal, 1993, 90 (1): 155–160Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Narayanan R, Darwish I Y S. Use of steel fibers as shear reinforcement. ACI Structural Journal, 1987, 84(3): 216–227Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Ashour S A, Hasanain G S, Wafa F F. Shear behavior of high-strength fiber reinforced concrete beams. ACI Structural Journal, 1992, 89(2): 176–184Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Swamy R N, Jones R, Chiam A T P. Influence of steel fibers on the shear resistance of lightweight concrete I-beams. ACI Structural Journal, 1993, 90(1): 103–114Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Narayanan R, Darwish I Y S. Fiber concrete deep beams in shear. ACI Structural Journal, 1988, 85(2): 141–149Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Sanad A, Saka M P. Prediction of ultimate shear strength of reinforced concrete deep beams using neuronal networks. Journal of Structural Engineering, 2001, 127(7): 818–828CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Adebar P, Mindess S, St.-Pierre D, Olund B. Shear tests of fiber concrete beams without stirrups. ACI Structural Journal, 1997, 94 (1): 68–76Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Vu-Bac N, Lahmer T, Keitel H, Zhao J, Zhuang X, Rabczuk T. Stochastic predictions of bulk properties of amorphous polyethylene based on molecular dynamics simulations. Mechanics of Materials, 2014a, 68: 70–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Vu-Bac N, Lahmer T, Zhang Y, Zhuang X, Rabczuk T. Stochastic predictions of interfacial characteristic of polymeric nanocomposites (PNCs). Composites Part B: Engineering, 2014b, 59: 80–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Vu-Bac N, Silani M, Lahmer T, Zhuang X, Rabczuk T. A unified framework for stochastic predictions of mechanical properties of polymeric nanocomposites. Computational Materials Science, 2015a, 96: 520–535CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Vu-Bac N, Rafiee R, Zhuang X, Lahmer T, Rabczuk T. Uncertainty quantification for multiscale modeling of polymer nanocomposites with correlated parameters. Composites. Part B, Engineering, 2015b, 68: 446–464CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Projects and Reconstruction DepartmentUniversity of BaghdadBaghdadIraq

Personalised recommendations