Advertisement

Detection of void and metallic inclusion in 2D piezoelectric cantilever beam using impedance measurements

  • S. Samanta
  • S. S. Nanthakumar
  • R. K. Annabattula
  • X. ZhuangEmail author
Research Article
  • 47 Downloads

Abstract

The aim of current work is to improve the existing inverse methodology of void-detection based on a target impedance curve, leading to quick-prediction of the parameters of single circular void. In this work, mode-shape dependent shifting phenomenon of peaks of impedance curve with change in void location has been analyzed. A number of initial guesses followed by an iterative optimization algorithm based on univariate method has been used to solve the problem. In each iteration starting from each initial guess, the difference between the computationally obtained impedance curve and the target impedance curve has been reduced. This methodology has been extended to detect single circular metallic inclusion in 2D piezoelectric cantilever beam. A good accuracy level was observed for detection of flaw radius and flaw-location along beam-length, but not the precise location along beam-width.

Keywords

piezoelectricity impedance curve mode shapes inverse problem flaw detection curve shifting 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful for the financial support from NSFC (Grant No. 11772234) and DAAD (IIT sandwich master program).

References

  1. 1.
    Galasso F S. Structure, Properties, and Preparation of Perovskite- Type Compounds. Oxford: Pergamon Press, 1969Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Nanthakumar S, Lahmer T, Rabczuk T. Detection of flaws in piezoelectric structures using extended fem. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 2013, 96(6): 373–389MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Areias P, Rabczuk T. Steiner-point free edge cutting of tetrahedral meshes with applications in fracture. Finite Elements in Analysis and Design, 2017, 132: 27–41Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Areias P, Rabczuk T, Msekh M. Phase-field analysis of finite-strain plates and shells including element subdivision. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2016, 312: 322–350MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Areias P, Rabczuk T,. Sá J C. A novel two-stage discrete crack method based on the screened Poisson equation and local mesh refinement. Computational Mechanics, 2016, 58(6): 1003–1018MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Areias P, Msekh M, Rabczuk T. Damage and fracture algorithm using the screened Poisson equation and local remeshing. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 2016, 158: 116–143Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Areias P, Reinoso J, Camanho P, Rabczuk T. A constitutive-based element-by-element crack propagation algorithm with local mesh refinement. Computational Mechanics, 2015, 56(2): 291–315MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Areias P, Rabczuk T, Camanho P. Finite strain fracture of 2D problems with injected anisotropic softening elements. Theoretical and Applied Fracture Mechanics, 2014, 72(1): 50–63Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Areias P, Rabczuk T, Dias-da Costa D. Element-wise fracture algorithm based on rotation of edges. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 2013, 110: 113–137Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Areias P, Rabczuk T. Finite strain fracture of plates and shells with configurational forces and edge rotations. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 2013, 94(12): 1099–1122MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Areias P, Rabczuk T, Camanho P. Initially rigid cohesive laws and fracture based on edge rotations. Computational Mechanics, 2013, 52(4): 931–947zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Areias P, Reinoso J, Camanho P, de Sá J C, Rabczuk T. Effective 2D and 3D crack propagation with local mesh refinement and the screened Poisson equation. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 2018, 189: 339–360Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Nguyen-Xuan H, Liu G, Bordas S, Natarajan S, Rabczuk T. An adaptive singular ES-FEM for mechanics problems with singular field of arbitrary order. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2013, 253: 252–273MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Zhuang X, Huang R, Liang C, Rabczuk T. A coupled thermo-hydromechanical model of jointed hard rock for compressed air energy storage. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2014, 179169Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Moës N, Dolbow J, Belytschko T. A finite element method for crack growth without remeshing. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 1999, 46(1): 133–150MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Belytschko T, Black T. Elastic crack growth in finite elements with minimal remeshing. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 1999, 45(5): 601–620zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Chen L, Rabczuk T, Bordas S, Liu G, Zeng K, Kerfriden P. Extended finite element method with edge-based strain smoothing (ESM-XFEM) for linear elastic crack growth. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2012, 209–212: 250–265MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Bordas S, Rabczuk T, Hung N X, Nguyen V, Natarajan S, Bog T, Quan D, Hiep N. Strain smoothing in fem and XFEM. Computers & Structures, 2010, 88(23–24): 1419–1443Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Song J H, Areias PMA, Belytschko T. A method for dynamic crack and shear band propagation with phantom nodes. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 2006, 67(6): 868–893zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Tabarraei A, Song J H, Waisman H. A two-scale strong discontinuity approach for evolution of shear bands under dynamic impact loads. International Journal for Multiscale Computational Engineering, 2013, 11(6): 543–563Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Areias P, Song J, Belytschko T. Analysis of fracture in thin shells by overlapping paired elements. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 2006, 195: 5343–5360zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Chau-Dinh T, Zi G, Lee P S, Rabczuk T, Song J H. Phantom-node method for shell models with arbitrary cracks. Computers and Structures, 2012, 92–93: 242–246Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Rabczuk T, Zi G, Gerstenberger A, Wall W. A new crack tip element for the phantom-node method with arbitrary cohesive cracks. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 2008, 75(5): 577–599zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Vu-Bac N, Nguyen-Xuan H, Chen L, Lee C, Zi G, Zhuang X, Liu G, Rabczuk T. A phantom-node method with edge-based strain smoothing for linear elastic fracture mechanics. Journal of Applied Mathematics, 2013, 978026Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Msekh M, Cuong N, Zi G, Areias P, Zhuang X, Rabczuk T. Fracture properties prediction of clay/epoxy nanocomposites with interphase zones using a phase field model. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 2018, 188: 287–299Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Hamdia K, Silani M, Zhuang X, He P, Rabczuk T. Stochastic analysis of the fracture toughness of polymeric nanoparticle composites using polynomial chaos expansions. International Journal of Fracture, 2017, 206(2): 215–227Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Silani M, Talebi H, Hamouda A, Rabczuk T. Nonlocal damage modeling in clay/epoxy nanocomposites using a multiscale approach. Journal of Computational Science, 2016, 15: 18–23Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Talebi H, Silani M, Rabczuk T. Concurrent multiscale modeling of three dimensional crack and dislocation propagation. Advances in Engineering Software, 2015, 80(C): 82–92Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Talebi H, Silani M, Bordas S, Kerfriden P, Rabczuk T. A computational library for multiscale modeling of material failure. Computational Mechanics, 2014, 53(5): 1047–1071MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Budarapu P, Gracie R, Yang S W, Zhuang X, Rabczuk T. Efficient coarse graining in multiscale modeling of fracture. Theoretical and Applied Fracture Mechanics, 2014, 69: 126–143Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Budarapu P, Gracie R, Bordas S, Rabczuk T. An adaptive multiscale method for quasi-static crack growth. Computational Mechanics, 2014, 53(6): 1129–1148Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Zhang C, Nanthakumar S, Lahmer T, Rabczuk T. Multiple cracks identification for piezoelectric structures. International Journal of Fracture, 2017, 206(2): 151–169Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Nanthakumar S, Zhuang X, Park H, Rabczuk T. Topology optimization of flexoelectric structures. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids, 2017, 105: 217–234MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Nanthakumar S, Lahmer T, Zhuang X, Park H, Rabczuk T. Topology optimization of piezoelectric nanostructures. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids, 2016, 94: 316–335MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Nanthakumar S, Valizadeh N, Park H, Rabczuk T. Surface effects on shape and topology optimization of nanostructures. Computational Mechanics, 2015, 56(1): 97–112MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Nanthakumar S, Lahmer T, Zhuang X, Zi G, Rabczuk T. Detection of material interfaces using a regularized level set method in piezoelectric structures. Inverse Problems in Science and Engineering, 2016, 24(1): 153–176MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Nanthakumar S, Lahmer T, Rabczuk T. Detection of multiple flaws in piezoelectric structures using XFEM and level sets. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2014, 275: 98–112MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Nanthakumar S, Lahmer T, Rabczuk T. Detection of flaws in piezoelectric structures using extended fem. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 2013, 96(6): 373–389MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Gerstle W, Sau N, Silling S. Peridynamic modeling of concrete structures. Nuclear Engineering and Design, 2007, 237(12–13): 1250–1258Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Silling S. Reformulation of elasticity theory for discontinuities and long-range forces. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids, 2000, 48(1): 175–209MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Ren H, Zhuang X, Rabczuk T. Dual-horizon peridynamics: A stable solution to varying horizons. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2017, 318: 762–782MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Ren H, Zhuang X, Cai Y, Rabczuk T. Dual-horizon peridynamics. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 2016, 108(12): 1451–1476MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Belytschko T, Lu Y, Gu L. Element-free Galerkin methods. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 1994, 37(2): 229–256MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Fleming M, Chu Y, Moran B, Belytschko T. Enriched element-free Galerkin methods for crack tip fields. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 1997, 40(8): 1483–1504MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Belytschko T, Tabbara M. Dynamic fracture using element-free Galerkin methods. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 1996, 39(6): 923–938zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Belytschko T, Krongauz Y, Organ D, Fleming M, Krysl P. Meshless methods: An overview and recent developments. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 1996, 139(1–4): 3–47zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Rabczuk T, Belytschko T, Xiao S. Stable particle methods based on Lagrangian kernels. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2004, 193(12–14): 1035–1063MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Nguyen V, Rabczuk T, Bordas S, Duflot M. Meshless methods: A review and computer implementation aspects. Mathematics and Computers in Simulation, 2008, 79(3): 763–813MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Zhuang X, Augarde C, Mathisen K. Fracture modeling using meshless methods and level sets in 3D: Framework and modeling. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 2012, 92(11): 969–998MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Rabczuk T, Belytschko T. Cracking particles: A simplified meshfree method for arbitrary evolving cracks. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 2004, 61(13): 2316–2343zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Rabczuk T, Zi G, Bordas S, Nguyen-Xuan H. A simple and robust three-dimensional cracking-particle method without enrichment. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2010, 199(37–40): 2437–2455zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Rabczuk T, Samaniego E. Discontinuous modelling of shear bands using adaptive meshfree methods. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2008, 197(6–8): 641–658MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Rabczuk T, Areias P, Belytschko T. A simplified mesh-free method for shear bands with cohesive surfaces. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 2007, 69(5): 993–1021zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Rabczuk T, Belytschko T. A three-dimensional large deformation meshfree method for arbitrary evolving cracks. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2007, 196(29–30): 2777–2799MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Bordas S, Rabczuk T, Zi G. Three-dimensional crack initiation, propagation, branching and junction in non-linear materials by an extended meshfree method without asymptotic enrichment. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 2008, 75(5): 943–960Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Rabczuk T, Areias P, Belytschko T. A meshfree thin shell method for nonlinear dynamic fracture. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 2007, 72(5): 524–548MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Rabczuk T, Bordas S, Zi G. A three-dimensional meshfree method for continuous multiple-crack initiation, propagation and junction in statics and dynamics. Computational Mechanics, 2007, 40(3): 473–495zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Zi G, Rabczuk T, Wall W. Extended meshfree methods without branch enrichment for cohesive cracks. Computational Mechanics, 2007, 40(2): 367–382zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Rabczuk T, Zi G. A meshfree method based on the local partition of unity for cohesive cracks. Computational Mechanics, 2007, 39(6): 743–760zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Rabczuk T, Areias P. A meshfree thin shell for arbitrary evolving cracks based on an extrinsic basis. Computer Modeling in Engineering & Sciences, 2006, 16(2): 115–130Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    Rabczuk T, Zi G, Bordas S, Nguyen-Xuan H. A geometrically nonlinear three-dimensional cohesive crack method for reinforced concrete structures. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 2008, 75(16): 4740–4758Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    Rabczuk T, Gracie R, Song J H, Belytschko T. Immersed particle method for fluid-structure interaction. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 2010, 81(1): 48–71MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Rabczuk T, Bordas S, Zi G. On three-dimensional modelling of crack growth using partition of unity methods. Computers & Structures, 2010, 88(23–24): 1391–1411Google Scholar
  64. 64.
    Amiri F, Anitescu C, Arroyo M, Bordas S, Rabczuk T. XLME interpolants, a seamless bridge between XFEM and enriched meshless methods. Computational Mechanics, 2014, 53(1): 45–57MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Amiri F, Millán D, Shen Y, Rabczuk T, Arroyo M. Phase-field modeling of fracture in linear thin shells. Theoretical and Applied Fracture Mechanics, 2014, 69: 102–109Google Scholar
  66. 66.
    Hughes T J, Cottrell J A, Bazilevs Y. Isogeometric analysis: CAD, finite elements, NURBS, exact geometry and mesh refinement. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2005, 194(39–41): 4135–4195MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Cottrell J A, Hughes T J, Bazilevs Y. Isogeometric Analysis: Toward Integration of CAD and FEA. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 2009zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Benson D, Bazilevs Y, Hsu M C, Hughes T. Isogeometric shell analysis: The Reissner-Mindlin shell. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2010, 199(5–8): 276–289MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Benson D, Bazilevs Y, Hsu M C, Hughes T. A large deformation, rotation-free, isogeometric shell. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2011, 200(13–16): 1367–1378MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Nguyen-Thanh N, Zhou K, Zhuang X, Areias P, Nguyen-Xuan H, Bazilevs Y, Rabczuk T. Isogeometric analysis of large-deformation thin shells using RHT-splines for multiple-patch coupling. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2017, 316: 1157–1178MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Nguyen-Thanh N, Kiendl J, Nguyen-Xuan H, Wüchner R, Bletzinger K U, Bazilevs Y, Rabczuk T. Rotation free isogeometric thin shell analysis using PHT-splines. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2011, 200(47–48): 3410–3424MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Pawar A, Zhang Y, Jia Y, Wei X, Rabczuk T, Chan C, Anitescu C. Adaptive FEM-based nonrigid image registration using truncated hierarchical B-splines. Computers & Mathematics with Applications (Oxford, England), 2016, 72(8): 2028–2040MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Jia Y, Zhang Y, Rabczuk T. A novel dynamic multilevel technique for image registration. Computers & Mathematics with Applications (Oxford, England), 2015, 69(9): 909–925MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Thai T, Rabczuk T, Bazilevs Y, Meschke G. A higher-order stressbased gradient-enhanced damage model based on isogeometric analysis. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2016, 304: 584–604MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    Ghasemi H, Park H S, Rabczuk T. A multi-material level set-based topology optimization of flexoelectric composites. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2018, 332: 47–62MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    Ghasemi H, Park H, Rabczuk T. A level-set based IGA formulation for topology optimization of flexoelectric materials. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2017, 313: 239–258MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    Ghasemi H, Park H, Rabczuk T. Multi-material level set-based topology optimization of flexoelectric composites. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2018, 332: 47–62MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  78. 78.
    Ghasemi H, Brighenti R, Zhuang X, Muthu J, Rabczuk T. Optimal fiber content and distribution in fiber-reinforced solids using a reliability and NURBS based sequential optimization approach. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2015, 51(1): 99–112MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    Anitescu C, Hossain M, Rabczuk T. Recovery-based error estimation and adaptivity using high-order splines over hierarchical T-meshes. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2018, 328: 638–662MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  80. 80.
    Nguyen-Thanh N, Nguyen-Xuan H, Bordas S, Rabczuk T. Isogeometric analysis using polynomial splines over hierarchical T-meshes for two-dimensional elastic solids. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2011, 200(21–22): 1892–1908MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  81. 81.
    Nguyen V, Anitescu C, Bordas S, Rabczuk T. Isogeometric analysis: An overview and computer implementation aspects. Mathematics and Computers in Simulation, 2015, 117: 89–116MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  82. 82.
    Anitescu C, Jia Y, Zhang Y, Rabczuk T. An isogeometric collocation method using super-convergent points. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2015, 284: 1073–1097MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  83. 83.
    Nguyen B, Tran H, Anitescu C, Zhuang X, Rabczuk T. An isogeometric symmetric Galerkin boundary element method for two-dimensional crack problems. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2016, 306: 252–275MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  84. 84.
    Jia Y, Anitescu C, Ghorashi S, Rabczuk T. Extended isogeometric analysis for material interface problems. IMA Journal of Applied Mathematics, 2015, 80(3): 608–633MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  85. 85.
    Ghorashi S, Valizadeh N, Mohammadi S, Rabczuk T. T-spline based XIGA for fracture analysis of orthotropic media. Computers & Structures, 2015, 147: 138–146Google Scholar
  86. 86.
    Nguyen-Thanh N, Valizadeh N, Nguyen M, Nguyen-Xuan H, Zhuang X, Areias P, Zi G, Bazilevs Y, De Lorenzis L, Rabczuk T. An extended isogeometric thin shell analysis based on Kirchhoff- Love theory. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2015, 284: 265–291MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  87. 87.
    Chan C, Anitescu C, Rabczuk T. Volumetric parametrization from a level set boundary representation with PHT-splines. Computer Aided Design, 2017, 82: 29–41MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  88. 88.
    Pérez N, Carbonari R C, Andrade M A B, Buiochi F, Adamowski J C. A FEM-based method to determine the complex material properties of piezoelectric disks. Ultrasonics, 2014, 54(6): 1631–1641Google Scholar
  89. 89.
    Kiyono C Y, Pérez N, Silva E C N. Determination of full piezoelectric complex parameters using gradient-based optimization algorithm. Smart Materials and Structures, 2016, 25(2): 025019Google Scholar
  90. 90.
    Pérez N, Buiochi F, Brizzotti Andrade M, Adamowski J. Numerical characterization of piezoceramics using resonance curves. Materials (Basel), 2016, 9(2): 71Google Scholar
  91. 91.
    Vu-Bac N, Duong T, Lahmer T, Zhuang X, Sauer R, Park H, Rabczuk T. A NURBS-based inverse analysis for reconstruction of nonlinear deformations in thin shell structures. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2018, 331: 427–455MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  92. 92.
    Ikeda T. Piezoelectricity. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1990Google Scholar
  93. 93.
    Yang J. An introduction to the theory of piezoelectricity. Vol. 9. Berlin: Springer, 2004Google Scholar
  94. 94.
    Allik H, Hughes T J. Finite element method for piezoelectric vibration. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 1970, 2(2): 151–157Google Scholar
  95. 95.
    Holland R. Representation of dielectric, elastic, and piezoelectric losses by complex coefficients. IEEE Transactions on Sonics and Ultrasonics, 1967, 14(1): 18–20Google Scholar
  96. 96.
    Lahrner T, Kaltenbacher M, Kaltenbacher B, Lerch R, Leder E. FEM-based determination of real and complex elastic, dielectric, and piezoelectric moduli in piezoceramic materials. IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control, 2008, 55(2): 465–475Google Scholar
  97. 97.
    Huyer W, Neumaier A. Global optimization by multilevel coordinate search. Journal of Global Optimization, 1999, 14(4): 331–355MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  98. 98.
    Vu-Bac N, Lahmer T, Zhuang X, Nguyen-Thoi T, Rabczuk T. A software framework for probabilistic sensitivity analysis for computationally expensive models. Advances in Engineering Software, 2016, 100: 19–31Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. Samanta
    • 1
    • 2
  • S. S. Nanthakumar
    • 1
  • R. K. Annabattula
    • 2
  • X. Zhuang
    • 1
    • 3
    Email author
  1. 1.Institute of Continuum MechanicsLeibniz University HannoverHannoverGermany
  2. 2.Indian Institute of TechnologyMadras ChennaiIndia
  3. 3.College of Civil EngineeringTongji UniversityShanghaiChina

Personalised recommendations