Advertisement

Effect of calcium lactate on compressive strength and self-healing of cracks in microbial concrete

  • Kunamineni VijayEmail author
  • Meena Murmu
Research Article
  • 135 Downloads

Abstract

This paper presents the effect on compressive strength and self-healing capability of bacterial concrete with the addition of calcium lactate. Compared to normal concrete, bacterial concrete possesses higher durability and engineering concrete properties. The production of calcium carbonate in bacterial concrete is limited to the calcium content in cement. Hence calcium lactate is externally added to be an additional source of calcium in the concrete. The influence of this addition on compressive strength, self-healing capability of cracks is highlighted in this study. The bacterium used in the study is bacillus subtilis and was added to both spore powder form and culture form to the concrete. Bacillus subtilis spore powder of 2 million cfu/g concentration with 0.5% cement was mixed to concrete. Calcium lactates with concentrations of 0.5%, 1.0%, 1.5%, 2.0%, and 2.5% of cement, was added to the concrete mixes to test the effect on properties of concrete. In other samples, cultured bacillus subtilis with a concentration of 1×105 cells/mL was mixed with concrete, to study the effect of bacteria in the cultured form on the properties of concrete. Cubes of 100 mm×100 mm×100 mm were used for the study. These cubes were tested after a curing period of 7, 14 and 28 d. A maximum of 12% increase in compressive strength was observed with the addition of 0.5% of calcium lactate in concrete. Scanning electron microscope and energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy examination showed the formation of ettringite in pores; calcium silicate hydrates and calcite which made the concrete denser. A statistical technique was applied to analyze the experimental data of the compressive strengths of cementations materials. Response surface methodology was adopted for optimizing the experimental data. The regression equation was yielded by the application of response surface methodology relating response variables to input parameters. This method aids in predicting the experimental results accurately with an acceptable range of error. Findings of this investigation indicated the influence of added calcium lactate in bio-concrete which is quite impressive for improving the compressive strength and self-healing properties of concrete.

Keywords

calcium lactate bacillus subtilis compressive strength self-healing of cracks 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Muhammad N Z, Keyvanfar A, Majid M Z A, Shafaghat A, Mirza J. Waterproof performance of concrete: A critical review on implemented approaches. Construction & Building Materials, 2015, 101: 80–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Rapoport J, Aldea C M, Shah S P, Ankenman B, Karr A. Permeability of cracked steel fiber-reinforced concrete. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 2002, 14(4): 355–358CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Jonkers H, Schlangen E. Development of a bacteria-based self healing concrete. In: Walraven J C, Stoelhorst D, eds. Tailor Made Concrete Structures. London: CRC Press, 2008, 109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    De Muynck W, De Belie N, Verstraete W. Microbial carbonate precipitation in construction materials: A review. Ecological Engineering, 2010, 36(2): 118–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Andalib R, Majid M Z A, Hussin M W, Ponraj M, Keyvanfar A, Mirza J, Lee H S. Optimum concentration of Bacillus megaterium for strengthening structural concrete. Construction & Building Materials, 2016, 118: 180–193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Luo M, Qian C X, Li R Y. Factors affecting crack repairing capacity of bacteria-based self-healing concrete. Construction & Building Materials, 2015, 87: 1–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Siddique R, Nanda V, Kunal E H, Kadri M, Iqbal Khan M, Singh M, Rajor A. Influence of bacteria on compressive strength and permeation properties of concrete made with cement baghouse filter dust. Construction & Building Materials, 2016, 106: 461–469CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    De Muynck W, Cox K, De Belie N, Verstraete W. Bacterial carbonate precipitation as an alternative surface treatment for concrete. Construction & Building Materials, 2008, 22(5): 875–885CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Talaiekhozani A, Keyvanfar A, Andalib R, Samadi M, Shafaghat A, Kamyab H, Majid M Z A, Zin R M, Fulazzaky M A, Lee C T, Hussin M W. Application of Proteus mirabilis and Proteus vulgaris mixture to design self-healing concrete. Desalination and Water Treatment, 2014, 52(19–21): 3623–3630CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Jonkers H M, Schlangen E. A two component bacteria-based selfhealing concrete. Cultures, 2009, 215–220Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Siddique R, Chahal N K. Effect of ureolytic bacteria on concrete properties. Construction & Building Materials, 2011, 25(10): 3791–3801CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sangadji S, Wiktor V, Jonkers H, Schlangen E. Injecting a liquid bacteria-based repair system to make porous network concrete healed. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Self- Healing Materials. Ghent, 2013, 118–122Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Wiktor V, Jonkers H M. Case studies in construction materials field performance of bacteria-based repair system: Pilot study in a parking garage. Case Studies in Construction Materials, 2015, 2: 11–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Jonkers H M, Thijssen A, Muyzer G, Copuroglu O, Schlangen E. Application of bacteria as self-healing agent for the development of sustainable concrete. Ecological Engineering, 2010, 36(2): 230–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Bang S S, Galinat J K, Ramakrishnan V. Calcite precipitation induced by polyurethane-immobilized Bacillus pasteurii. Enzyme and Microbial Technology, 2001, 28(4–5): 404–409CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Vijay K, Murmu M, Deo S V. Bacteria based self healing concrete—A review. Construction & Building Materials, 2017, 152: 1008–1014CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    BIS. 8112, Indian Standard 43 Grade Ordinary Portland Cement—- Specification, Bureau of Indian Standards. 1989Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    BIS. 383, Specifications for Coarse and Fine Aggregates from Natural Sources for Concrete. 1970Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Khaliq W, Ehsan M B. Crack healing in concrete using various bio influenced self-healing techniques. Construction & Building Materials, 2016, 102: 349–357CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    BIS. 10262, Guidelines for Concrete Mix Design Proportioning, Bureau of Indian Standards. 2009Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Alsanusi S, Bentaher L. Prediction of compressive strength of concrete from early age test result using design experiments (RSM). World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology International Journal of Civil and Environmental Engineering, 2011, 9(12): 978–984Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Vu-Bac N, Silani M, Lahmer T, Zhuang X, Rabczuk T. A unified framework for stochastic predictions of mechanical properties of polymeric nanocomposites. Computational Materials Science, 2015, 96(Part B): 520–535CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Vu-Bac N, Rafiee R, Zhuang X, Lahmer T, Rabczuk T. Uncertainty quantification formultiscale modeling of polymer nanocomposites with correlated parameters. Composites. Part B, Engineering, 2015, 68: 446–464CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Vu-Bac N, Lahmer T, Zhuang X, Nguyen-Thoi T, Rabczuk T. A software framework forprobabilistic sensitivity analysis for computationally expensive models. Advances in Engineering Software, 2016, 100: 19–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Vu-Bac N, Lahmer T, Keitel H, Zhao J, Zhuang X, Rabczuk T. Stochastic predictions of bulk properties of amorphous polyethylene based on molecular dynamics simulations. Mechanics of Materials, 2014, 68, 70–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Vu-Bac N, Lahmer T, Zhang Y, Zhuang X, Rabczuk T. Stochastic predictions of interfacial characteristic of polymeric nanocomposites (PNCs). Composites. Part B, Engineering, 2014, 59: 80–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Badawy M F, Msekh M A, Hamdia K M, Steiner M K, Lahmer T, Rabczuk T. Hybrid nonlinear surrogate models for fracture behavior of polymeric nanocomposites. Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics, 2017, 50: 64–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Civil EngineeringNational Institute of TechnologyRaipurIndia

Personalised recommendations