Advertisement

Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering

, Volume 13, Issue 1, pp 38–48 | Cite as

Empirical models and design codes in prediction of modulus of elasticity of concrete

  • Behnam VakhshouriEmail author
  • Shami Nejadi
Review

Abstract

Modulus of Elasticity (MOE) is a key parameter in reinforced concrete design. It represents the stress-strain relationship in the elastic range and is used in the prediction of concrete structures. Out of range estimation of MOE in the existing codes of practice strongly affect the design and performance of the concrete structures. This study includes: (a) evaluation and comparison of the existing analytical models to estimating the MOE in normal strength concrete, and (b) proposing and verifying a new model. In addition, a wide range of experimental databases and empirical models to estimate the MOE from compressive strength and density of concrete are evaluated to verification of the proposed model. The results show underestimation of MOE of conventional concrete in majority of the existing models. Also, considering the consistency between density and mechanical properties of concrete, the predicted MOE in the models including density effect, are more compatible with the experimental results.

Keywords

modulus of elasticity normal strength normal weight concrete empirical models design codes compressive strength density 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Korkmaz K A, Demir F, Tekeli H. Uncertainty modelling of critical column buckling for reinforced concrete buildings. Sadhana, 2011, 36(2): 267–280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Aslani F, Nejadi S. Mechanical properties of conventional and selfcompacting concrete: An analytical study. Construction & Building Materials, 2012, 36: 330–347CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Noguchi T, Tomosawa F, Nemati KM, Chiaia BM, Fantilli AR. A practical equation for elastic modulus of concrete. ACI Structural Journal, 2009, 106(5): 690–696Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Fanourakis G, Ballim Y. An assessment of the accuracy of nine design models for predicting creep in concrete. Journal of the South African Institution of Civil Engineering, 2006, 48(4): 2–8Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Haranki B. Strength, modulus of elasticity, creep and shrinkage of concrete used in Florida. 2009, University of FloridaGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kheder G, Al-Windawi S. Variation in mechanical properties of natural and recycled aggregate concrete as related to the strength of their binding mortar. Materials and Structures, 2005, 38(7): 701–709CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Zhang M H, Gjvorv O E. Mechanical properties of high-strength lightweight concrete. Materials Journal, 1991, 88(3): 240–247Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Topçu I B, Ugurlu A. Elasticity theory of concrete and prediction of Static E-modulus for dam Concrete using composite models. Teknik Dergi, 2007, 18(1): 4055–4067Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    LIZARAZO-MARRIAGA, LÓPEZ YÉPEZ. Effect of sedimentary and metamorphic aggregate on static modulus of elasticity of highstrength concrete. Dyna (Bilbao), 2011, 78: 235–242Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Knepper W H L D H. Geologic characterization of natural aggregate; a field geologist’s guide to natural aggregate resource assessment, in Open-File Report. 1995, U.S. Geological Survey: USA. p. 28Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Crouch L, Pitt J, Hewitt R. Aggregate effects on pervious portland cement concrete static modulus of elasticity. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 2007, 19(7): 561–568CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Aïtcin P C. High performance concrete. 2011, CRC press, USGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Chen S, Wang H, Zhang J, Xing H, Wang H. Experimental study on low-strength similar-material proportioning and properties for coal mining. Advances in Materials Science and Engineering, 2015, (3): 1–6Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    SP-52-101, SP-52-101-2003. Concrete and reinforced concrete structures without prestressing. In Gosstroi of Russia, Moscow, 2004Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Levtchitch V. Seismic performance capacities of old concrete. In: Proceedings of the 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 2004Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Rashid M, Mansur M, Paramasivam P. Correlations between mechanical properties of high-strength concrete. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 2002, 14(3): 230–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Liu Y. Strength, modulus of elasticity, shrinkage and creep of concrete. 2007, CiteseerGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Abbasi A, Al-Tayyib A. Effect of hot weather on modulus of rupture and splitting tensile strength of concrete. Cement and Concrete Research, 1985, 15(2): 233–244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Lam L, Wong Y, Poon C S. Effect of fly ash and silica fume on compressive and fracture behaviors of concrete. Cement and Concrete Research, 1998, 28(2): 271–283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Giaccio G, Zerbino R. Failure mechanism of concrete: combined effects of coarse aggregates and strength level. Advanced Cement Based Materials, 1998, 7(2): 41–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kim J K, Han S H. Mechanical properties of self-flowing concrete. in High-Performance Concrete: Design and Materials and Recent Advances in Concrete Technology. Proceedings of Third CANMET/ ACI International Conference, 1997Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Ajdukiewicz A, Kliszczewicz A. Influence of recycled aggregates on mechanical properties of HS/HPC. Cement and Concrete Composites, 2002, 24(2): 269–279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Swaddiwudhipong S, Lu H R, Wee T H. Direct tension test and tensile strain capacity of concrete at early age. Cement and Concrete Research, 2003, 33(12): 2077–2084CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Sheinn A, Tam C, Rodrigo F. Comparative Study On Hardened Properties Of Self compacting Concrete (Scc) With Normal Slump Concrete (Nsc). In: Proceedings of the 29th Conference On Our World In Concrete & Structures, Singapore, 2004Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kim J K, Lee Y, Yi S T. Fracture characteristics of concrete at early ages. Cement and Concrete Research, 2004, 34(3): 507–519CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Leemann A, Hoffmann C. Properties of self-compacting and conventional concrete–differences and similarities. Magazine of Concrete Research, 2005, 57(6): 315–319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Bjegovic D, Skazlic M, Skazlic Ž. Fracture Energy of Ultra High Performance Concrete Beams Using AE Technique. In: Proceedings of the 6th International Congress “Global Construction: ultimate concrete opportunities”, 2005Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Rodríguez de Sensale G. Strength development of concrete with rice-husk ash. Cement and Concrete Composites, 2006, 28(2): 158–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Bissonnette B, Pigeon M, Vaysburd A M. Tensile creep of concrete: study of its sensitivity to basic parameters. ACI Materials Journal, 2007, 104(4): 360–368Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Perez A, Pablo J. Effect of slag cement on drying shrinkage of concrete. in Masters Abstracts International, 2008Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Theran G, Miguel M. Experimental evaluation of the modulus of elasticity of self-consolidating concrete. Masters Abstracts International, 2009Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Liu A P, Yin J, Song W M. Study on the Performance and Application of High Performance Pavement Portland Cement Concrete. Advanced Materials Research. 2013, 639-649(203): 411–416Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Parra C, Valcuende M, Gomez F. Splitting tensile strength and modulus of elasticity of self-compacting concrete. Construction & Building Materials, 2011, 25(1): 201–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Guru Jawahar J, Sashidhar C, Ramana Reddy I V, Annie Peter J. Effect of coarse aggregate blending on short-term mechanical properties of self compacting concrete. Materials & Design, 2013, 43: 185–194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Lane DS. Evaluation of concrete characteristics for rigid pavements. VTRC 98-R24. Virginia transportation research council, 1998, CharlottesvilleGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    JSCE. Guidelines for concrete, Standard specifications for concrete structures-Design. Japan Society of Civil Engineering, JSCE, 2010, JAPANGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    BS-5400-4. Steel, concrete and composite bridges, Part 4: Code of practice for design of concrete bridges. Committee reference CSB/ 59, Draft for comment 88/11190 DC (1990), 1990, British Standard: UKGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    ACI-318-08. Building code requirements for structural concrete, in American Concrete Institute. 2008, American Concrete Institute: Farmington Hills MIGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    CSAA23 M94. Design of concrete structures. Canadian Standard Association, 1994, Rexdale, ONGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    VBC-1995. Voorschriften Beton TGB 1990. Constructieve Eisen en Rekenmethoden, 1995Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Pauw A. Static modulus of elasticity of concrete as affected by density. Aci Structural Journal, 1960Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Administration F H. Material Property Characterization of Ultra-High Performance Concrete, in FHWA. Highway Research Center: McLean, 2000, VAGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    NCHRP. National Cooperative Highway Research Program in NCHRP, 2003, Washington DC, USGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Beton C E I d. CEB-FIP model code 1990, in CEB-FIP-90. 2003, Thomas Telford, LondonGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    AASHTO. Interim bridge design specifications and commentary. American Association of Highway and Transportation Officials Washington (DC), 2006Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Ministry of Transportation. Ontario Highway Bridge Design Code, in OHBDC. Ministry of Transportation, Downs view, 1983, Ontario, CanadaGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    AIJ. Standard for Structural calculations of steel reinforced concrete structures. Architectural Institute of Japan, 1985, JapanGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    CSA A23.04. Design of concrete structures. Canadian Standards Association, 2004, CanadaGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    NTE-E 060. Reglamento nacional de edificaciones. Norma Técnica de Edificaciones, 2009, Concreto Armado: PerúGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    BS-8110-1. Structural use of concrete, Part14: Code of practice for design and construction, in Committee reference B/525/2 Draft for comment 95/105430 DC. 1997, British Standard: UKGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    AS-3600-09. Concrete structures, in Australian Standards. Standards Australia, 2009, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    IS-456-2000. Plain and reinforced concrete code of practice. Indian Standard, 2000, IndiaGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    RakMK-D3-12. Rakennusten energiatehokkuus. Suomen rakentamismääräyskokoelma, 2012, Finnish building code: HelsinkiGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    ACI-318-95. Building code requirements for structural concrete. American Concrete Institute. 1995, Farmington Hills MIGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    ACI-363-R. State of the art report on high-strength concrete. American Concrete Institute, 1992, Farmington Hills (Michigan)Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    ACI-209 2R-08. Guide for Modeling and Calculating Shrinkage and Creep in Hardened Concrete. 2008, ACI CommitteGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    NZS-3101. Concrete Structures Standard, Part 1-The Design of Concrete Structures. New Zealand Standard Wellington, 1995, New ZealandGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Beton C E. High-strength concrete state of the art report, in CEBFIP. 1990, Thomas Telford: LondonGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Eurocode-2. Design of Concrete Structures. Part 1-General Rules and Rules for Buildings, in EN 1992-1-1. The Concrete Centre: Blackwater, 2004, Camberley, UKGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    NS-3473. Concrete structures—design rules, in Norges Standardiserings Forbund. Norwegian Council for Strandardization, 1992, Oslo, NorwayGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    EHE. Spanish code for structural concrete. Real Decreto 2661, 1998, Madrid, SpainGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    NBR-6118. Design of concrete structures. Brazilian association of technical standards, 2003, Rio de JaneiroGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    TS-500. Building code requirements for reinforced concrete. Turkish Standards Institute, 2000, Ankara, TurkeyGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Carrasquillo RL, Nilson HH. Properties of high strength concrete subjected to short term loads. ACI Journal Proceedings, 1981, 78(3): 171–178Google Scholar
  65. 65.
    Dinakar P, Babu K, Santhanam M. Mechanical properties of highvolume fly ash self-compacting concrete mixtures. Structural Concrete, 2008, 9(2): 109–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Soleymani H R. Structural design properties of concrete for a bridge in Alberta. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 2006, 33(2): 199–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Sabaa B, Ravindrarajah R S. Engineering properties of lightweight concrete containing crushed expanded polystyrene waste. In: Material Research Society, Fall Meeting Symposium MM, Advances in Materials for Cementitious Composites, 1997, BostonGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Schoppe B M. Shrinkage & modulus of elasticity in concrete with recycled aggregates. 2011, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis ObispoCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Gardner N, Zhao J. Mechanical properties of concrete for calculation of long term deformations. Proceedings of the second Canadian on cement and concrete, Vancouver, Canada, 1991, 150–159Google Scholar
  70. 70.
    Ahmad S H, Shah S P. Structural properties of high strength concrete and its implications for precast prestressed concrete. PCI Journal, 1985, 30(6): 92–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Jobse H J, Moustafa S E. Applications of high strength concrete for highway bridges. PCI Journal, 1984, 29(3): 44–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Cook J E. 10,000 psi concrete. Concrete International, 1989, 11(10): 67–75Google Scholar
  73. 73.
    Gutierrez P A, Canovas M F. The modulus of elasticity of high performance concrete. Materials and Structures, 1995, 28(10): 559–568CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre for Built Infrastructure ResearchUniversity of Technology SydneySydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations