Advertisement

Frontiers in Energy

, Volume 13, Issue 3, pp 494–505 | Cite as

Feasibility of using wind turbines for renewable hydrogen production in Firuzkuh, Iran

  • Ali MostafaeipourEmail author
  • Mojtaba Qolipour
  • Hossein Goudarzi
Research Article
  • 76 Downloads

Abstract

The present study was conducted with the objective of evaluating several proposed turbines from 25 kW to 1.65 MW in order to select the appropriate turbine for electricity and hydrogen production in Firuzkuh area using the decision making trial and evaluation (DEMATEL) and data envelopment analysis (DEA) methods. Initially, five important factors in selection of the best wind turbine for wind farm construction were determined using the DEMATEL technique. Then, technical-economic feasibility was performed for each of the eight proposed turbines using the HOMER software, and the performance score for each proposed wind turbine was obtained. The results show that the GE 1.5sl model wind turbine is suitable for wind farm construction. The turbine can generate 5515.325 MW of electricity annually, which is equivalent to $ 1103065. The average annual hydrogen production would be 1014 kg for Firuzkuh by using the GE 1.5sl model turbine.

Keywords

wind turbine hydrogen production HOMER software decision making trial and evaluation (DEMATEL) data envelopment analysis (DEA) Firuzkuh 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Mostafaeipour A, Jadidi M, Mohammadi K, Sedaghat A. An analysis of wind energy potential and economic evaluation in Zahedan, Iran. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2014, 30: 641–650CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Mostafaeipour A. Economic evaluation of small wind turbine utilization in Kerman, Iran. Energy Conversion and Management, 2013, 73: 214–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Mostafaeipour A, Sedaghat A, Ghalishooyan M, Dinpashoh Y, Mirhosseini M, Sefid M, Pour-Rezaei M. Evaluation of wind energy potential as a power generation source for electricity production in Binalood, Iran. Renewable Energy, 2013, 52: 222–229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Montoya F, Manzano-Agugliaro F, Lopez-Marquez S, Hernandez-Escobedo Q, Gil C. Wind turbine selection for wind farm layout using multi-objective evolutionary algorithms. Expert Systems with Applications, 2014, 41(15): 6585–6595CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chowdhury S, Zhang J, Messac A, Castillo L. Optimizing the arrangement and the selection of turbines for wind farms subject to varying wind conditions. Renewable Energy, 2013, 52: 273–282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ritter M, Deckert L. Site assessment, turbine selection, and local feed-in tariffs through the wind energy index. Applied Energy, 2017, 185: 1087–1099CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Perkin S, Garrett D, Jensson P. Optimal wind turbine selection methodology: a case-study for Burfell, Iceland. Renewable Energy, 2015, 75: 165–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hammad M, Batarseh L. Innovative wind turbine selection method using modified Weibull probability function. Journal of Architectural Engineering Technology, 2015, 4(1): 139Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Salem A A. Turbine selection for wind farm potentials in east Libya. Dissertation for the Master’s Degree. Indonesian: University of Sebelas Maret, 2015Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Park C Y, Lee T H, Dorris S E, Balachandran U. Hydrogen production from fossil and renewable sources using an oxygen transport membrane. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2010, 35(9): 4103–4110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ehteshami S M M, Vignesh S, Rasheed R K A, Chan S H. Numerical investigations on ethanol electrolysis for production of pure hydrogen from renewable sources. Applied Energy, 2016, 170: 388–393CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bakenne A, Nuttall W, Kazantzis N. Sankey-Diagram-based insights into the hydrogen economy of today. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2016, 41(19): 7744–7753CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Cherry R S. A hydrogen utopia? International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2004, 29(2): 125–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Giraldi M R, François J L, Martin-Del-Campo C. Life cycle assessment of hydrogen production from a high temperature electrolysis process coupled to a high temperature gas nuclear reactor. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2015, 40(10): 4019–4033CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Badwal S P S, Giddey S, Munnings C. Hydrogen production via solid electrolytic routes. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews. Energy and Environment, 2013, 2(5): 473–487CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Olateju B, Monds J, Kumar A. Large scale hydrogen production from wind energy for the upgrading of bitumen from oil sands. Applied Energy, 2014, 118: 48–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Patyk A, Bachmann T M, Brisse A. Life cycle assessment of H2 generation with high temperature electrolysis. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2013, 38(10): 3865–3880CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Siyal S H, Mentis D, Mörtberg U, Samo S R, Howells M. A preliminary assessment of wind generated hydrogen production potential to reduce the gasoline fuel used in road transport sector of Sweden. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2015, 40(20): 6501–6511CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Giddey S, Kulkarni A, Badwal S P S. Low emission hydrogen generation through carbon assisted electrolysis. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2015, 40(1): 70–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Suleman F, Dincer I, Agelin-Chaab M. Comparative impact assessment study of various hydrogen production methods in terms of emissions. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2016, 41(19): 8364–8375CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Huang P H, Kuo J K, Wu Z D. Applying small wind turbines and a photovoltaic system to facilitate electrolysis hydrogen production. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2016, 41(20): 8514–8524CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Mostafaeipour A, Khayyami M, Sedaghat A, Mohammadi K, Shamshirband S, Sehati M A, Gorakifard E. Evaluating the wind energy potential for hydrogen production: a case study. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2016, 41(15): 6200–6210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Sigal A, Cioccale M, Rodríguez C R, Leiva E P M. Study of the natural resource and economic feasibility of the production and delivery of wind hydrogen in the province of Córdoba, Argentina. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2015, 40(13): 4413–4425CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Loisel R, Baranger L, Chemouri N, Spinu S, Pardo S. Economic evaluation of hybrid off-shore wind power and hydrogen storage system. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2015, 40(21): 6727–6739CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Mostafaeipour A, Abesi S. Wind turbine productivity and development in Iran. In: 1st International Conference on Biosciences, BioSciencesWorld 2010. Cancun, Mexico, 2010, 112–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Mostafaeipour A, Bardel B, Mohammadi K, Sedaghat A, Dinpashoh Y. Economic evaluation for cooling and ventilation of medicine storage warehouses utilizing wind catchers. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2014, 38: 12–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Mostafaeipour A, Qolipour M, Mohammadi K. Evaluation of installing photovoltaic plants using a hybrid approach for Khuzestan province, Iran. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2016, 60: 60–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Alavi O, Sedaghat A, Mostafaeipour A. Sensitivity analysis of different wind speed distribution models with actual and truncated wind data: a case study for Kerman, Iran. Energy Conversion and Management, 2016, 120: 51–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Alavi O, Mohammadi K, Mostafaeipour A. Evaluating the suitability of wind speed probability distribution models: a case of study of east and southeast parts of Iran. Energy Conversion and Management, 2016, 119: 101–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Qolipour M, Mostafaeipour A, Shamshirband S, Alavi O, Goudarzi H, Petković D. Evaluation of wind power generation potential using a three hybrid approach for households in Ardebil Province, Iran. Energy Conversion and Management, 2016, 118: 295–305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Büyüközkan G, Çifçi G. A novel hybrid MCDM approach based on fuzzy DEMATEL, fuzzy ANP and fuzzy TOPSIS to evaluate green suppliers. Expert Systems with Applications, 2012, 39(3): 3000–3011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Hsu C W, Kuo T C, Chen S H, Hu A H. Using DEMATEL to develop a carbon management model of supplier selection in green supply chain management. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2013, 56: 164–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Ou Yang Y P, Shieh H M, Tzeng G H. A VIKOR technique based on DEMATEL and ANP for information security risk control assessment. Information Sciences, 2013, 232: 482–500CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Bai C, Sarkis J. A grey-based DEMATEL model for evaluating business process management critical success factors. International Journal of Production Economics, 2013, 146(1): 281–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Baykasoğlu A, Kaplanoglu V, Durmuşoglu Z, Şahin C. Integrating fuzzy DEMATEL and fuzzy hierarchical TOPSIS methods for truck selection. Expert Systems with Applications, 2013, 40(3): 899–907CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Lee H S, Tzeng G H, Yeih W, Wang Y J, Yang S C. Revised DEMATEL: resolving the infeasibility of DEMATEL. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 2013, 37(10–11): 6746–6757MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Carrillo M, Jorge J M. A multiobjective DEA approach to ranking alternatives. Expert Systems with Applications, 2016, 50: 130–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Boloori F. A slack based network DEA model for generalized structures: an axiomatic approach. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 2016, 95: 83–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Wanke P, Barros C P, Nwaogbe O R. Assessing productive efficiency in Nigerian airports using Fuzzy-DEA. Transport Policy, 2016, 49: 9–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Toloo M. On finding the most BCC-efficient DMU: a new integrated MIP-DEA model. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 2012, 36(11): 5515–5520MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Toloo M, Nalchigar S. A new integrated DEA model for finding most BCC-efficient DMU. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 2009, 33(1): 597–604zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Rödder W, Reucher E. Advanced X-efficiencies for CCR- and BCCmodels—towards Peer-based DEA controlling. European Journal of Operational Research, 2012, 219(2): 467–476CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Govindan K, Khodaverdi R, Vafadarnikjoo A. A grey DEMATEL approach to develop third-party logistics provider selection criteria. Industrial Management and Data Systems, 2016, 116(4): 690–722CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ali Mostafaeipour
    • 1
    Email author
  • Mojtaba Qolipour
    • 1
  • Hossein Goudarzi
    • 2
  1. 1.Industrial Engineering DepartmentYazd UniversityYazdIran
  2. 2.School of Architecture and Environmental DesignIran University of Science and TechnologyTehranIran

Personalised recommendations