Scale characters analysis for gully structure in the watersheds of loess landforms based on digital elevation models
- 8 Downloads
Scale is the basic attribute for expressing and describing spatial entity and phenomena. It offers theoretical significance in the study of gully structure information, variable characteristics of watershed morphology, and development evolution at different scales. This research selected five different areas in China’s Loess Plateau as the experimental region and used DEM data at different scales as the experimental data. First, the change rule of the characteristic parameters of the data at different scales was analyzed. The watershed structure information did not change along with a change in the data scale. This condition was proven by selecting indices of gully bifurcation ratio and fractal dimension as characteristic parameters of watershed structure information. Then, the change rule of the characteristic parameters of gully structure with different analysis scales was analyzed by setting the scale sequence of analysis at the extraction gully. The gully structure of the watershed changed with variations in the analysis scale, and the change rule was obvious when the gully level changed. Finally, the change rule of the characteristic parameters of the gully structure at different areas was analyzed. The gully fractal dimension showed a significant numerical difference in different areas, whereas the variation of the gully branch ratio was small. The change rule indicated that the development degree of the gully obviously varied in different regions, but the morphological structure was basically similar.
Keywordswatershed scale features gully structure bifurcation ratio fractal dimension scale sequence
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
This work was supported by the auspices of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 41471331, 41601408, and 41506111).
- Altaf F, Meraj G, Romshoo S A (2014). Morphometric analysis to infer hydrological behaviour of Lidder watershed, Western Himalaya, India. Geography Journal, 2013(2013): 1–12Google Scholar
- Chen Y Z (1984). The classification of gully in hilly loess region in the middle reaches of the yellow river. Scientla Geographica Sinica, (04): 321–327 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
- Cheng J C, Jiang M Q (1986). Watershed Topography System. Beijing: Science Press (in Chinese)Google Scholar
- Hong S Z, Hong S M (1988). A study of fractals in geoscience: drainages, earthquakes and others. Exploration of Nature, (02): 33–40 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
- Li L, Ying S (2005). Fundamental problem on spatial scale. Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University, 30(03): 199–203 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
- Li Z J, Liu J, Yang Z (2014). Estimating the fractal dimension value of valley based on DEM data. Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University, 39(11): 1277–1281 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
- Lu X J, Li H G, Chen S P, (2000). The initial research on the geographical spatial-temporal system spatial-temporal hierarchy. Geo-Information Science, 2(1): 60–66 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
- Lu Z C, Jia S F, Huang K X (1991). The Drainage Geomorphic System. Dalian: Dalian Publishing House (in Chinese)Google Scholar
- Mandelbrot B B, Wheeler J A (1982). The fractal geometry of nature. J R Stat Soc [Ser A], 147(4): 468–469Google Scholar
- Oguchi T (2015). Drainage density and relative relief in humid steep mountains with frequent slope failure. Earth Surf Process Landf, 2 (22): 107–120Google Scholar
- Strahler A N (1957). Quantitative analysis of watershed geomorphology. Eos (Wash DC), 6(38): 913–920Google Scholar
- Tang G, Liu X, Fang L, Luo M (2006). A review on the scale issue in DEMs and digital terrain analysis. Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University, 31(12): 1059–1066Google Scholar
- Wang L, Fan W, Xu X, Liu Y (2014). The spatial scaling effect of canopy FAPAR retrieved by remote sensing. In: Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium. IEEE: 804–807Google Scholar
- William D C (2011). Scaling relations between riparian vegetation and stream order in the Whitewater River network. Wildl Soc Bull, 2(32): 594–597Google Scholar
- Zhou Q M, Lees B, Tang G A (2008). Advances in digital terrain analysis. Lecture Notes in Geoinformation & Cartography, 2008: 3–10Google Scholar