Advertisement

Frontiers of Materials Science

, Volume 12, Issue 3, pp 304–321 | Cite as

Influence and its mechanism of temperature variation in a muffle furnace during calcination on the adsorption performance of rod-like MgO to Congo red

  • Yajun Zheng
  • Liyun Cao
  • Gaoxuan Xing
  • Zongquan Bai
  • Hongyan Shen
  • Jianfeng Huang
  • Zhiping Zhang
Research Article
  • 20 Downloads

Abstract

Calcination temperature plays a crucial role in determining the surface properties of generated MgO, but the influence of temperature variation in a muffle furnace during calcination on its performance is rarely reported. Herein we observed that the temperature in a muffle furnace during calcination demonstrated a gradually increasing trend as the location changed from the furnace doorway to the most inner position. The variation in temperature had a great impact on the adsorption performance of generated rod-like MgO without and/or with involvement of Na2SiO3 to Congo red in aqueous solution. To get a better understanding on the detailed reasons, various techniques including actual temperature measurement via multimeter, N2 physical adsorption, CO2 chemical adsorption and FT-IR spectrometry have been employed to probe the correlation between the adsorption performance of generated MgO from various locations and the inner actual temperature of used muffle furnace as well as their physicochemical properties. In addition, two mechanisms were proposed to elucidate the adsorption process of Congo red over the surface of generated MgO without and/or with presence of Na2SiO3, respectively.

Keywords

magnesium oxide calcination muffle furnace placed location adsorption performance 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge funding support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 21575112, 21777128 and 21705125) and Shaanxi S&T Research Development Project of China (Grant No. 2016GY-231).

Supplementary material

11706_2018_427_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (475 kb)
Supplementary information

References

  1. [1]
    Abdullah H, Kuo D H, Kuo Y R, et al. Facile synthesis and recyclability of thin nylon film-supported n-type ZnO/p-type Ag2O nano composite for visible light photocatalytic degradation of organic dye. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 2016, 120 (13): 7144–7154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    Zhang G, Li X, Li Y, et al. Removal of anionic dyes from aqueous solution by leaching solutions of white mud. Desalination, 2011, 274(1–3): 255–261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    Patel Y, Mehta C, Gupte A. Assessment of biological decolorization and degradation of sulfonated di-azo dye Acid Maroon V by isolated bacterial consortium EDPA. International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation, 2012, 75: 187–193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    Vahid B, Khataee A. Photoassisted electrochemical recirculation system with boron-doped diamond anode and carbon nanotubes containing cathode for degradation of a model azo dye. Electrochimica Acta, 2013, 88: 614–620CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    Yoo E S, Libra J, Adrian L. Mechanism of decolorization of azo dyes in anaerobic mixed culture. Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2001, 127(9): 844–849CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    Akhtar S, Khan A A, Husain Q. Potential of immobilized bitter gourd (Momordica charantia) peroxidases in the decolorization and removal of textile dyes from polluted wastewater and dyeing effluent. Chemosphere, 2005, 60(3): 291–301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    Wawrzkiewicz M. Removal of C.I. Basic Blue 3 dye by sorption onto cation exchange resin, functionalized and non-functionalized polymeric sorbents from aqueous solutions and wastewaters. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2013, 217: 414–425CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    Bai Z, Zheng Y, Zhang Z. One-pot synthesis of highly efficient MgO for the removal of Congo red in aqueous solution. Journal of Materials Chemistry A, 2017, 5(14): 6630–6637CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    Zhong P S, Widjojo N, Chung T S, et al. Positively charged nanofiltration (NF) membranes via UV grafting on sulfonated polyphenylenesulfone (sPPSU) for effective removal of textile dyes from wastewater. Journal of Membrane Science, 2012, 417–418: 52–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    Shi B, Li G, Wang D, et al. Removal of direct dyes by coagulation: the performance of preformed polymeric aluminum species. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2007, 143(1–2): 567–574CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    Bhatia D, Sharma N R, Singh J, et al. Biological methods for textile dye removal from wastewater: A review. Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology, 2017, 47(19): 1836–1876CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    Raval N P, Shah P U, Shah N K. Adsorptive amputation of hazardous azo dye Congo red from wastewater: a critical review. Environmental Science and Pollution Research International, 2016, 23(15): 14810–14853CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    Ahmad A, Mohd-Setapar S H, Chuong C S, et al. Recent advances in new generation dye removal technologies: novel search for approaches to reprocess wastewater. RSC Advances, 2015, 5(39): 30801–30818CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    Lawal I A, Chetty D, Akpotu S O, et al. Sorption of Congo red and reactive blue on biomass and activated carbon derived from biomass modified by ionic liquid. Environmental Nanotechnology Monitoring & Management, 2017, 8: 83–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. [15]
    Seyahmazegi E N, Mohammad-Rezaei R, Razmi H. Multiwall carbon nanotubes decorated on calcined eggshell waste as a novel nano-sorbent: Application for anionic dye Congo red removal. Chemical Engineering Research & Design, 2016, 109: 824–834CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. [16]
    Debnath S, Maity A, Pillay K. Impact of process parameters on removal of Congo red by graphene oxide from aqueous solution. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, 2014, 2(1): 260–272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. [17]
    Yang J M. A facile approach to fabricate an immobilizedphosphate zirconium-based metal-organic framework composite (UiO-66-P) and its activity in the adsorption and separation of organic dyes. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 2017, 505: 178–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. [18]
    Lei C, Pi M, Jiang C, et al. Synthesis of hierarchical porous zinc oxide (ZnO) microspheres with highly efficient adsorption of Congo red. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 2017, 490: 242–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. [19]
    Zheng Y, Zhu B, Chen H, et al. Hierarchical flower-like nickel(II) oxide microspheres with high adsorption capacity of Congo red in water. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 2017, 504: 688–696CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. [20]
    Feng J, Gao M, Zhang Z, et al. Fabrication of mesoporous magnesium oxide nanosheets using magnesium powder and their excellent adsorption of Ni(II). Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 2018, 510: 69–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. [21]
    Pilarska A A, Klapiszewski L, Jesionowski T. Recent development in the synthesis, modification and application of Mg(OH)2 and MgO: A review. Powder Technology, 2017, 319: 373–407CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. [22]
    Ahmed S, Guo Y, Huang R, et al. Hexamethylene tetramineassisted hydrothermal synthesis of porous magnesium oxide for high-efficiency removal of phosphate in aqueous solution. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, 2017, 5(5): 4649–4655CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. [23]
    Zhu K, Hu J, Kübel C, et al. Efficient preparation and catalytic activity of MgO(111) nanosheets. Angewandte Chemie, 2006, 45 (43): 7277–7281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. [24]
    Sutradhar N, Sinhamahapatra A, Pahari S K, et al. Controlled synthesis of different morphologies of MgO and their use as solid base catalysts. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 2011, 115 (25): 12308–12316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. [25]
    Wang F, Ta N, Shen W. MgO nanosheets, nanodisks, and nanofibers for the Meerwein–Ponndorf–Verley reaction. Applied Catalysis A: General, 2014, 475: 76–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. [26]
    Liu X, Niu C, Zhen X, et al. Novel approach for the synthesis of Mg(OH)2 nanosheets and lamellar MgO nanostructures and their ultra-high adsorption capacity for Congo red. Journal of Materials Research, 2015, 30(10): 1639–1647CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. [27]
    Zhang Z, Zheng Y, Chen J, et al. Facile synthesis of monodisperse magnesium oxide microspheres via seed-induced precipitation and their applications in high-performance liquid chromatography. Advanced Functional Materials, 2007, 17(14): 2447–2454CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. [28]
    Zhu Y M, Han Y X, Liu G L. Cubic-shaped nano-MgO powder and its infrared absorption properties. Advanced Materials Research, 2010, 92: 35–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. [29]
    Xiang L, Liu F, Li J, et al. Hydrothermal formation and characterization of magnesium oxysulfate whiskers. Materials Chemistry and Physics, 2004, 87(2–3): 424–429CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. [30]
    Yan Y, Zhou L, Zhang J, et al. Synthesis and growth discussion of one-dimensional MgO nanostructures: nanowires, nanobelts, and nanotubes in VLS mechanism. The The Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 2008, 112(28): 10412–10417CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. [31]
    Yan C, Sun C, Shi Y, et al. Surface fabrication of oxides via solution chemistry. Journal of Crystal Growth, 2008, 310(7–9): 1708–1712CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. [32]
    Sharma M, Jeevanandam P. Synthesis of magnesium oxide particles with stacks of plates morphology. Journal of Alloys and Compounds, 2011, 509(30): 7881–7885CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. [33]
    Boddu V M, Viswanath D S, Maloney S W. Synthesis and characterization of coralline magnesium oxide nanoparticles. Journal of the American Ceramic Society, 2008, 91(5): 1718–1720CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. [34]
    Kim K H, Lee M S, Choi J S, et al. Microstructural and textural characterization in MgO thin film using HRTEM. Thin Solid Films, 2009, 517(14): 3995–3998CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. [35]
    Purwajanti S, Zhou L, Ahmad Nor Y, et al. Synthesis of magnesium oxide hierarchical microspheres: A dual-functional material for water remediation. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 2015, 7(38): 21278–21286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. [36]
    Zhang X, Zheng Y, Yang H, et al. Controlled synthesis of mesocrystal magnesium oxide parallelogram and its catalytic performance. CrystEngComm, 2015, 17(13): 2642–2650CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. [37]
    Wu X, Cao H, Yin G, et al. MgCO3·3H2O and MgO complex nanostructures: controllable biomimetic fabrication and physical chemical properties. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, 2011, 13(11): 5047–5052CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. [38]
    Eubank WR. Calcination studies of magnesium oxides. Journal of the American Ceramic Society, 1951, 34(8): 225–229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. [39]
    Gai P L, Montero J M, Lee A F, et al. In situ aberration correctedtransmission electron microscopy of magnesium oxide nanocatalysts for biodiesels. Catalysis Letters, 2009, 132(1–2): 182–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. [40]
    Mastuli M S, Roshidah R, Mahat A M, et al. Sol–gel synthesis of highly stable nano sized MgO from magnesium oxalate dihydrate. Advanced Materials Research, 2012, 545: 137–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. [41]
    Moorthy V K. Influence of calcination treatments on the development of morphology in magnesia powders. Transactions of the Indian Ceramic Society, 2014, 35(5): 89–98Google Scholar
  42. [42]
    Ikegami T, Kobayashi M, Moriyoshii Y, et al. Characterization of sintered MgO compacts with fluorine. Journal of the American Ceramic Society, 1980, 63(11–12): 640–643CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. [43]
    Thomas D K, Baker T W. An X-ray study of the factors causing variation in the heats of solution of magnesium oxide. Proceedings of the Physical Society, 1959, 74(6): 673–679CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. [44]
    Anderson P J, Livey D T. Physical methods for investigating the properties of oxide powders in relation to sintering. Powder Metallurgy, 1961, 4(7): 189–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. [45]
    Zhang X, Zheng Y, Feng X, et al. Calcination temperaturedependent surface structure and physicochemical properties of magnesium oxide. RSC Advances, 2015, 5(105): 86102–86112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. [46]
    Pei L Z, Yin W Y, Wang J F, et al. Low temperature synthesis of magnesium oxide and spinel powders by a sol–gel process. Materials Research, 2010, 13(3): 339–343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. [47]
    Valcheva-Traykova M L, Davidova N P, Weiss A H. Thermal decomposition of Mg, Al-hydrotalcite material. Journal of Materials Science, 1993, 28(8): 2157–2162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. [48]
    Sharma L, Kakkar R. Hierarchical porous magnesium oxide (Hr-MgO) microspheres for adsorption of an organophosphate pesticide: Kinetics, isotherm, thermodynamics, and DFT studies. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 2017, 9(44): 38629–38642CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. [49]
    Zhang Z, Zhang S, Chen J, et al. Characterization of the surface properties of Mg/Al oxides by the solvation parameter model. Journal of Chromatography A, 2006, 1115(1–2): 58–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. [50]
    Ciesielczyk F, Bartczak P, Klapiszewski L, et al. Treatment of model and galvanic waste solutions of copper(II) ions using a lignin/inorganic oxide hybrid as an effective sorbent. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2017, 328: 150–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. [51]
    Ciesielczyk F, Bartczak P, Zdarta J, et al. Active MgO–SiO2 hybrid material for organic dye removal: A mechanism and interaction study of the adsorption of C.I. Acid Blue 29 and C.I. Basic Blue 9. Journal of Environmental Management, 2017, 204 (Pt 1): 123–135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. [52]
    Jesionowski T, Przybylska A, Kurc B, et al. The preparation of pigment composites by adsorption of C.I. Mordant Red 11 and 9-aminoacridine on both unmodified and aminosilane-grafted silica supports. Dyes and Pigments, 2011, 88(1): 116–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yajun Zheng
    • 1
    • 2
  • Liyun Cao
    • 1
  • Gaoxuan Xing
    • 2
  • Zongquan Bai
    • 2
  • Hongyan Shen
    • 3
  • Jianfeng Huang
    • 1
  • Zhiping Zhang
    • 2
  1. 1.School of Material Science and EngineeringShaanxi University of Science and TechnologyXi’anChina
  2. 2.School of Chemistry and Chemical EngineeringXi’an Shiyou UniversityXi’anChina
  3. 3.School of Earth Sciences and EngineeringXi’an Shiyou UniversityXi’anChina

Personalised recommendations