Frontiers of Chemical Science and Engineering

, Volume 12, Issue 4, pp 670–682 | Cite as

Methyl acetate–methanol mixture separation by extractive distillation: Economic aspects

  • Elena GraczováEmail author
  • Branislav Šulgan
  • Samuel Barabas
  • Pavol Steltenpohl
Research Article


Methyl acetate is considered low toxicity volatile solvent produced either as a by-product during methanol carbonylation or via acetic acid esterification with methanol. In both cases, pure methyl acetate has to be isolated from the reaction mixture. Simulation of methyl acetate separation from its mixture with methanol by extraction distillation was carried out in ASPEN + software. In total three case studies were assumed using two different extraction solvents and two solvent regeneration strategies. In case A, novel extraction solvent 1-ethyl-3-methylimidazolium trifluoromethanesulfonate ionic liquid, was considered. Raw material separation was achieved in an extraction distillation column while the solvent regeneration was accomplished in a second distillation column in this case. In case study B, the same extraction solvent was used; however, its regeneration was carried out in a single-effect evaporator. Dimethyl sulfoxide was the second extraction solvent selected. Its use in methyl acetate-methanol separation is presented in case study C. As high purity of dimethyl sulfoxide was required for the methyl acetate-methanol azeotrope breaking, its regeneration was carried out in the second distillation column only. To simulate the ternary methyl acetate–methanol–extraction solvent mixtures separation, vapor–liquid equilibrium was predicted based on the NRTL equation. Further, unknown properties of the considered ionic liquid and variation of these properties with temperature were predicted and introduced into the ASPEN + components properties database. Based on these data, optimum operation parameters of the respective separation equipment were established. In all case studies, the same condition had to be fulfilled, namely minimum methyl acetate content in the distillate from the extraction distillation column of 99.5mol-%. Results of simulations using the respective optimum operation parameters were employed in the economic evaluation of the three separation unit designs studied. It was found that the least energy-demanding design corresponds to the case study B in terms of both capital as well as operation expenses.


methyl acetate 1-ethyl-3-methylimidazolium trifluoromethanesulfonate extraction distillation dimethyl sulfoxide economic evaluation 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.



This work was supported by the Research and Development Assistance Agency APVV (APVV-0858-12).


  1. 1.
    Agreda V H, Partin L R, Heise W H. High-purity methyl acetate via reactive distillation. Chemical Engineering Progress, 1990, 86(2): 40–46Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Huss R S, Chen F R, Malone M F, Doherty M F. Reactive distillation for methyl acetate production. Computers & Chemical Engineering, 2003, 27(12): 1855–1866CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Giwa A. Methyl acetate reactive distillation process modeling, simulation and optimization using ASPEN Plus. Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences (Asian Research Publishing Network), 2013, 8(5): 386–392Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Rohde C, Marr R, Siebenhofer M. Investigation of methyl acetate production by reactive extraction. In: Proceedings of the AIChE Annual Meeting 2004. Austin: AIChE, 2004, 5113–5118Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lux S, Winkler T, Siebenhofer M. Synthesis and isolation of methyl acetate through heterogeneous catalysis with liquid–liquid extraction. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2010, 49(21): 10274–10278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cao Y J, Li M, Wang Y, Zhao T R, Li X, Zhu Z Y, Wang Y L. Effect of feed temperature on economics and controllability of pressureswing distillation for separating binary azeotrope. Chemical Engineering and Processing: Process Intensification, 2016, 110: 160–171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Berg L, Yeh A I. The separation of methyl acetate from methanol by extractive distillation. Chemical Engineering Communications, 1984, 30(1–2): 113–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lei Z G, Li C Y, Chen B H. Extractive distillation: A review. Separation and Purification Reviews, 2003, 32(2): 121–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Mahdi T, Ahmad A, Nasef M M, Ripin A. State-of-the-art technologies for separation of azeotropic mixtures. Separation and Purification Reviews, 2015, 44(4): 308–330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Schuur B. Selection and design of ionic liquids as solvents in extractive distillation and extractive processes. Chemical Papers, 2015, 69(2): 245–253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Jongmans M T G, Hermens E, Raijmakers M, Maassen J I W, Schuur B, de Haan A B. Conceptual process design of extractive distillation processes for ethylbenzene/styrene separation. Chemical Engineering Research & Design, 2012, 90(12): 2086–2100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Jongmans M T G, Trampé J, Schuur B, de Haan A B. Solute recovery from ionic liquids: A conceptual design study for recovery of styrene monomer from [4-mebupy][BF4]. Chemical Engineering and Processing: Process Intensification, 2013, 70: 148–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Li G Z, Bai P. New operation strategy for separation of ethanolwater by extractive distillation. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2012, 51(6): 2723–2729CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Quijada-Maldonado E, Aelmans T A M, Meindersma G W, de Haan A B. Pilot plant validation of a rate-based extractive distillation model for water–ethanol separation with the ionic liquid [emim][DCA] as solvent. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2013, 223: 287–297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Gutierrez H J P. Extractive distillation with ionic liquids as solvents: Selection and conceptual process design. Dissertation for the Doctoral Degree. Eindhoven: Eindhoven University of Technology, 2013, 137–139Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Meindersma G W, Quijada-Maldonado E, Jongmans M, de Haan A B. Extractive distillation with ionic liquids: Pilot plant experiments and conceptual process design. In: Ionic Liquids for Better Separation Processes. Berlin: Springer, 2016, 11–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Dhanalakshmi J, Sai P S T, Balakrishnan A R. Study of ionic liquids as entrainers for the separation of methyl acetate–methanol and ethyl acetate–ethanol systems using the COSMO-RS model. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2013, 52(46): 16396–16405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Zhang Z G, Hu A G, Zhang T, Zhang Q Q, SunMY, Sun D Z, LiW X. Separation of methyl acetate + methanol azeotropic mixture using ionic liquids as entrainers. Fluid Phase Equilibria, 2015, 401: 1–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Orchillés A V, Miguel P J, Vercher E, Martínez-Andreu A. Isobaric vapor–liquid equilibria for methyl acetate + methanol + 1-ethyl-3-methylimidazolium trifluoromethanesulfonate at 100 kPa. Journal of Chemical & Engineering Data, 2007, 52(3): 915–920CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Cai J L, Cui X B, Zhang Y, Li R, Feng T Y. Vapor–liquid equilibrium and liquid–liquid equilibrium of methyl acetate + methanol + 1-ethyl-3-methylimidazolium acetate. Journal of Chemical & Engineering Data, 2011, 56(2): 282–287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Cai J L, Cui X B, Zhang Y, Li R, Feng T Y. Isobaric vapor liquid equilibrium for methanol + methyl acetate + 1-octyl-3-methylimidazolium hexafluorophosphate at 101.3 kPa. Journal of Chemical & Engineering Data, 2011, 56(2): 2884–2888CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Matsuda H, Tochigi K, Liebert V, Gmehling J. Vapor–liquid equilibria of ternary systems with 1-ethyl-3-methylimidazolium ethyl sulfate using headspace gas chromatography. Fluid Phase Equilibria, 2011, 307(2): 197–201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Dohnal V, Baránková E, Blahut A. Separation of methyl acetate + methanol azeotropic mixture using ionic liquid entrainers. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2014, 237: 199–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Zhang Z G, Hu A G, Zhang T, Zhang Q Q, Yang Z Q, Li W X. Isobaric vapor–liquid equilibrium for methyl acetate + methanol system containing different ionic liquids at 101.3 kPa. Fluid Phase Equilibria, 2016, 408: 20–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Cao J, Yu G G, Chen X C, Abdeltawab A A, Al-Enizi A M. Determination of vapor–liquid equilibrium of methyl acetate + methanol + 1-alkyl-3-methylimidazolium dialkylphosphates at 101.3 kPa. Journal of Chemical & Engineering Data, 2017, 62(2): 816–824CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Zhang X M, Liu H P, Liu Y X, Jian C G, Wang W. Experimental isobaric vapor–liquid equilibrium for the binary and ternary systems with methanol, methyl acetate and dimethyl sulfoxide at 101.3 kPa. Fluid Phase Equilibria, 2016, 408: 52–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Hsieh C T, Lee M J, Lin H M. Vapor–liquid–liquid equilibria for aqueous systems with methyl acetate, methyl propionate, and methanol. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2008, 47 (20): 7927–7933CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Crawford A G, Edwards G, Lindsay D S. The ternary system, methanol–methyl acetate–water. Journal of the Chemical Society, 1949: 1054–1058Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Gmehling J, Onken U. Vapor–Liquid Equilibrium Data Collection. Chemistry Data Series, Vol. I, Part 1. Frankfurt/Main: DECHEMA, 1977, 37–76, 258–264Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Pereiro A B, Araújo J M M, Esperança J M S S, Marrucho I M, Rebelo L P N. Ionic liquids in separations of azeotropic systems—A review. Journal of Chemical Thermodynamics, 2012, 46: 2–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Rogers R D, Seddon K R. Ionic liquids—solvents of the future? Science, 2003, 302(5646): 792–793CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Huddleston J G, Visser A E, ReichertWM,Willauer H D, Broker G A, Rogers R D. Characterization and comparison of hydrophilic and hydrophobic room temperature ionic liquids incorporating the imidazolium cation. Green Chemistry, 2001, 3(4): 156–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Humphrey J L, Keller G E II. Separation Process Technology. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1997, 1Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Blahušiak M, Kiss A A, Babic K, Kersten S R A, Bargeman G, Schuur B. Insights into the selection and design of fluid separation processes. Separation and Purification Technology, 2018, 194: 301–318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Steltenpohl P, Graczová E. Optimization of extraction solvent-to-feed ratio: Aqueous ethanol mixture separation using [TDTHP][NTf2] ionic liquid. Chemical Engineering Research & Design, 2017, 121: 200–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    de Riva J, Ferro V R, Moreno D, Diaz I, Palomar J. Aspen Plus supported conceptual design of the aromatic–aliphatic separation from low aromatic content naphtha using 4-methyl-N-butylpyridinium tetrafluoroborate ionic liquid. Fuel Processing Technology, 2016, 146: 29–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Larriba M, de Riva J, Navarro P, Moreno D, Delgado-Mellado N, García J, Ferro V R, Rodríguez F, Palomar J. COSMO-based/Aspen Plus process simulation of the aromatic extraction from pyrolysis gasoline using the {[4empy][NTf2] + [emim][DCA]} ionic liquid mixture. Separation and Purification Technology, 2018, 190: 211–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Graczová E, Dobcsányi D, Steltenpohl P. Separation of methyl acetate–methanol azeotropic mixture using 1-ethyl-3-methylimidazolium trifluoromethanesulfonate. Chemical Engineering Transactions, 2017, 61: 1183–1188Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Boston J F, Sullivan S L Jr. A new class of solution methods for multicomponent, multistage separation processes. Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering, 1974, 52(1): 52–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Seader J D, Henley E J, Roper D K. Separation Process Principles. 3rd ed. New Jersey: Wiley, 2010, 400–412Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Renon H, Prausnitz J M. Local compositions in thermodynamic excess functions for liquid mixtures. AIChE Journal. American Institute of Chemical Engineers, 1968, 14(1): 135–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Valderrama J O, Forero L A, Rojas R E. Critical properties and normal boiling temperature of ionic liquids. Update and a new consistency test. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2012, 51(22): 7838–7844CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Papari M M, Amighi S, Kiani M, Mohammad-Aghaie D, Haghighi B. Modification of a statistical mechanically-based equation of state: Application to ionic liquids. Journal of Molecular Liquids, 2012, 175: 61–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Zhang S J, Lu X M, Zhou Q, Li X H, Zhang X P, Li S C. Ionic liquids. Physicochemical properties. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2009, 47Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Zaitsau D H, Kabo G J, Strechan A A, Paulechka Y U, Tschersich A, Verevkin S P, Heintz A. Experimental vapor pressures of 1-alkyl-3-methylimidazolium bis(trifluoromethylsulfonyl)imides and a correlation scheme for estimation of vaporization enthalpies of ionic liquids. Journal of Physical Chemistry A, 2006, 110(22): 7303–7306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Joback K G, Reid R C. Estimation of pure-component properties from group-contributions. Chemical Engineering Communications, 1987, 57(1-6): 233–243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Retrieved from the website of Alibaba (methyl-acetate), January 10, 2018Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Retrieved from the website of Intratec (methanol), January 10, 2018Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Retrieved from the website of Alibaba (DMSO), January 10, 2018Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Elena Graczová
    • 1
    Email author
  • Branislav Šulgan
    • 1
  • Samuel Barabas
    • 1
  • Pavol Steltenpohl
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Chemical and Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Chemical and Food TechnologySlovak University of Technology in BratislavaBratislavaSlovakia

Personalised recommendations