Advertisement

Frontiers of Chemical Science and Engineering

, Volume 12, Issue 4, pp 708–717 | Cite as

Kinetic-compartmental modelling of potassium-containing cellulose feedstock gasification

  • Attila EgedyEmail author
  • Lívia Gyurik
  • Tamás Varga
  • Jun Zou
  • Norbert Miskolczi
  • Haiping Yang
Research Article
  • 5 Downloads

Abstract

Biomass is of growing interest as a secondary energy source and can be converted to fuels with higher energy density especially by pyrolysis or gasification. Understanding the mechanism and the kinetics of biomass pyrolysis (thermal decomposition) and gasification (conversion of organic material to gases) could be the key to the design of industrial devices capable of processing vast amounts of biomass feedstock. In our work real product components obtained in pyrolysis were took into consideration as well as char and oil as lumped components, and the kinetic constants for a biomass model compound (cellulose) pyrolysis and gasification were identified based on a proposed simplified reaction mechanism within a compartment model structure. A laboratory scale reactor was used for the physical experiments containing consecutive fast pyrolysis and gasification stages using alkali metal (K) containing feedstock, which has a significant effect on the cellulose pyrolysis and gasification. The detailed model was implemented in MATLAB/Simulink environment, and the unknown kinetic parameters were identified based on experimental data. The model was validated based on measurement data, and a good agreement was found. Based on the validated first principle model the optimal parameters were determined as 0.15 mL/min steam flow rate, and 4% K content.

Keywords

biomass pyrolysis kinetic parameter identification compartment modelling optimisation 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge the Horizon 2020, Marie Curie Research and Innovation Staff Exchange (RISE) (MSCA-RISE-2014 (Flexi-pyrocat, No. 643322)). Attila Egedy’s research was supported by EFOP-3.6.1-16-2016-00015 Smart Specialization Strategy (S3) –Comprehensive Institutional Development Program at the University of Pannonia to Promote Sensible Individual Education and Career Choices project.

References

  1. 1.
    Bridgwater A V. Review of fast pyrolysis of biomass and product upgrading. Biomass and Bioenergy, 2012, 38: 68–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Carrol A, Somerville C. Cellulosic biofuels. Annual Review of Plant Biology, 2009, 60(1): 165–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Suzdalenko V, Barmina I, Lickrastina A, Zake M. The effect of cogasification of the biomass pellets with gas on the thermal degradation of biomass. Chemical Engineering Transactions, 2011, 24: 7–12Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Sun L, Xu B, Smith R. Power and chemical production analysis based on biomass gasification processes. Chemical Engineering Transactions, 2014, 38: 61–66Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Yang H, Yan R, Chen H, Lee D H, Zheng C. Characteristics of hemicellulose, cellulose and lignin pyrolysis. Fuel, 2017, 86(12-13): 1781–1788CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Panepinto D, Genon G. Solid waste and biomass gasification: Fundamental processes and numerical simulation. Mathematical modelling. Chemical Engineering Transactions, 2011, 24: 25–30Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Wang S, Lin H, Ru B, Dai G, Wang X, Xiao G, Luo Z. Kinetic modeling of biomass components pyrolysis using a sequential and coupling method. Fuel, 2016, 185: 763–771CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lin Y, Cho J, Tompsett G,Westmoreland P R, Huber GW. Kinetics and mechanism of cellulose pyrolysis. Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 2009, 113(46): 20097–20107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Shen D, Xiao R, Gu S, Zhang H. The overview of thermal decomposition of cellulose in lignocellulosic biomass. Cellulose- Biomass Conversion, 2013, 193–226Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Olsson J G, Pettersson J B, Padban N, Bjerle I. Alkali metal emission from filter ash and fluidized bed material from PFB gasification of biomass. Energy & Fuels, 1998, 12(3): 626–630CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Cao W, Li J, Lue L, Zhang X. Release of alkali metals during biomass thermal conversion. Archives of Industrial Biotechnology, 2017, 1: 1–3Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Wang S, Liu Q, Liao Y, Luo Z, Cen K. A study on the mechanism research on cellulose pyrolysis under catalysis of metallic salts. Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering, 2007, 24(2): 336–340CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Koven A B, Tong S S, Farnood R R, Jia C Q. Alkali-thermal gasification and hydrogen generation potential of biomass. Frontiers of Chemical Science and Engineering, 2017, 11(3): 369–378CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Guan Y, Pei A, Guo L. Hydrogen production by catalytic gasification of cellulose in supercritical water. Frontiers of Chemical Engineering in China, 2008, 2(2): 176–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Patwardhan P R, Satrio J A, Brown R C, Shanks B H. Influence of inorganic salts on the primary pyrolysis products of cellulose. Bioresource Technology, 2010, 101(12): 4646–4655CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lobo L S, Carabineiro S A C. Kinetics and mechanism of catalytic carbon gasification. Fuel, 2016, 183: 457–469CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kaushal P, Tyagi R. Advanced simulation of biomass gasification in a fluidized bed reactor using Aspen plus. Renewable Energy, 2017, 101: 629–636CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lédé J. Cellulose pyrolysis kinetics: An historical review on the existence and role of intermediate active cellulose. Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis, 2012, 94: 17–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Richter F, Rein G. Pyrolysis kinetics and multi-objective inverse modelling of cellulose at the microscale. Fire Safety Journal, 2017, 91: 191–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Antal M J, Várhegyi G, Jakab E. Cellulose pyrolysis kinetics: Revisited. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 1998, 37 (4): 1267–1275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Goyal H, Pepiot P. A compact kinetic model for biomass pyrolysis at gasification conditions. Energy & Fuels, 2017, 31(11): 12120–12132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Halama S, Spliethoff H. Numerical simulation of entrained flow gasification: Reaction kinetics and char structure evolution. Fuel Processing Technology, 2015, 138: 314–324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Xiong Q, Aramideh S, Passalacqua A, Kong S C. BIOTC: An opensource CFD code for simulating biomass fast pyrolysis. Computer Physics Communications, 2014, 185(6): 1739–1746CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Fogarasi S, Egedy A, Imre-Lucaci F, Varga T, Chován T. Hybrid CFD-compartment approach for modelling and optimisation of a leaching reactor. Computer-Aided Chemical Engineering, 2014, 33: 1255–1260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Egedy A, Varga T, Chován T. Compartment model structure identification with qualitative methods for a stirred vessel. Mathematical and Computer Modelling of Dynamical Systems, 2013, 19(2): 115–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Zou J, Yang H, Zeng Z, Wu C, Williams P T, Chen H. Hydrogen production from pyrolysis catalytic reforming of cellulose in the presence of K alkali metal. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2016, 41(25): 10598–10607CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Yan L, Lim C J, Yue G, He B, Grace J R. Simulation of biomasssteam gasification in fluidized bed reactors: Model setup, comparisons and preliminary predictions. Bioresource Technology, 2016, 221: 625–635CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Digabel S L. Algorithm 909: NOMAD: Nonlinear optimization with the MADS algorithm. ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software, 2011, 37(4): 44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Audet C, Dennis J E Jr. Mesh adaptive direct search algorithms for constrained optimization. SIAM Journal on Optimization, 2006, 17 (1): 188–217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Smith B R J, Loganathan M, Shanta M S. A review of the water gas shift reaction kinetics. International Journal of Chemical Reactor Engineering, 2010, 8: 1–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Eri Q, Zhao X, Raganathan P, Gu S. Numerical simulations on the effect of potassium on the biomass fast pyrolysis in fluidized bed reactor. Fuel, 2017, 197: 290–297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Trendewicz A, Evans R, Dutta A, Sykes R, Carpenter D, Braun R. Evaluating the effect of potassium on cellulose pyrolysis reaction kinetics. Biomass and Bioenergy, 2015, 74: 15–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Attila Egedy
    • 1
    Email author
  • Lívia Gyurik
    • 1
  • Tamás Varga
    • 1
  • Jun Zou
    • 2
  • Norbert Miskolczi
    • 1
  • Haiping Yang
    • 2
  1. 1.Institute of Chemical and Process EngineeringUniversity of PannoniaVeszprémHungary
  2. 2.State Key Laboratory of Coal CombustionHuazhong University of Science and TechnolgyWuhanChina

Personalised recommendations