Advertisement

Frontiers of Chemical Science and Engineering

, Volume 12, Issue 4, pp 855–866 | Cite as

Recent advances on metal-free graphene-based catalysts for the production of industrial chemicals

  • Zhiyong Wang
  • Yuan Pu
  • Dan Wang
  • Jie-Xin Wang
  • Jian-Feng Chen
Review Article
  • 29 Downloads

Abstract

With the development of carbon catalysts, graphene-based metal-free catalysts have drawn increasing attention in both scientific research and in industrial chemical production processes. In recent years, the catalytic activities of metal-free catalysts have significantly improved and they have become promising alternatives to traditional metal-based catalysts. The use of metal-free catalysts greatly improves the sustainability of chemical processes. In view of this, the recent progress in the preparation of graphene-based metal-free catalysts along with their applications in catalytic oxidation, reduction and coupling reactions are summarized in this review. The future trends and challenges for the design of graphenebased materials for industrial organic catalytic reactions with good stabilities and high catalytic performance are also discussed.

Keywords

graphene-based materials metal-free catalyst industrial chemical productions catalytic reaction 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

Acknowledgements

We are grateful for financial support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 21620102007 and 21622601), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities of China (No. BUCTRC201601), and the “111” project of China (No. B14004).

References

  1. 1.
    Chowdhury A D, Houben K, Whiting G T, Chung S H, Baldus M, Weckhuysen B M. Electrophilic aromatic substitution over zeolites generates Wheland-type reaction intermediates. Nature Catalysis, 2017, 1(1): 23–31Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hasany M, Malakootikhah M, Rahmanian V, Yaghmaei S. Effect of hydrogen combustion reaction on the dehydrogenation of ethane in a fixed-bed catalytic membrane reactor. Chinese Journal of Chemical Engineering, 2015, 23(8): 1316–1325Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Koven A B, Tong S S, Farnood R R, Jia C Q. Alkali-thermal gasification and hydrogen generation potential of biomass. Frontiers of Chemical Science and Engineering, 2017, 11(3): 369–378Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Tan C, Cao X, Wu X J, He Q, Yang J, Zhang X, Chen J, Zhao W, Han S, Nam G H, Sindoro M, Zhang H. Recent advances in ultrathin two-dimensional nanomaterials. Chemical Reviews, 2017, 117(9): 6225–6331Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Georgakilas V, Perman J A, Tucek J, Zboril R. Broad family of carbon nanoallotropes: Classification, chemistry, and applications of fullerenes, carbon dots, nanotubes, graphene, nanodiamonds, and combined superstructures. Chemical Reviews, 2015, 115(11): 4744–4822Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ye M, Zhang Z, Zhao Y, Qu L. Graphene platforms for smart energy generation and storage. Joule, 2018, 2(2): 1–24Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Wang D, Zhu L, Chen J F, Dai L. Can graphene quantum dots cause DNA damage in cells? Nanoscale, 2015, 7(21): 9894–9901Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Tao H, Gao Y, Talreja N, Guo F, Texter J, Yan C, Sun Z. Twodimensional nanosheets for electrocatalysis in energy generation and conversion. Journal of Materials Chemistry. A, Materials for Energy and Sustainability, 2017, 5(16): 7257–7284Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Salehi E, Soroush F, Momeni M, Barati A, Khakpour A. Chitosan/polyethylene glycol impregnated activated carbons: Synthesis, characterization and adsorption performance. Frontiers of Chemical Science and Engineering, 2017, 11(4): 575–585Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Xiang Z, Wang D, Xue Y, Dai L, Chen J F, Cao D. PAF-derived nitrogen-doped 3D carbon materials for efficient energy conversion and storage. Scientific Reports, 2015, 5(1): 8307–8314Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Liu X, Dai L. Carbon-based metal-free catalysts. Nature Reviews Materials, 2016, 1(11): 16064–16075Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Su D S, Wen G, Wu S, Peng F, Schlögl R. Carbocatalysis in liquidphase reactions. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 2017, 56(4): 936–964Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Wang D, Wang Z, Zhan Q, Pu Y, Wang J X, Foster N R, Dai L. Facile and scalable preparation of fluorescent carbon dots for multifunctional applications. Engineering, 2017, 3(3): 402–408Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lv G, Wang H, Yang Y, Deng T, Chen C, Zhu Y, Hou X. Graphene oxide: A convenient metal-free carbocatalyst for facilitating aerobic oxidation of 5-hydroxymethylfurfural into 2,5-diformylfuran. ACS Catalysis, 2015, 5(8): 5636–5646Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Wang S, Li Y, Fan X, Zhang F, Zhang G. β-Cyclodextrin functionalized graphene oxide: An efficient and recyclable adsorbent for the removal of dye pollutants. Frontiers of Chemical Science and Engineering, 2015, 9(1): 77–83Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Liu Z, Wang W, Ju X, Xie R, Chu L. Graphene-based membranes for molecular and ionic separations in aqueous environments. Chinese Journal of Chemical Engineering, 2017, 25(11): 1598–1605Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kong X K, Chen C L, Chen Q W. Doped graphene for metal-free catalysis. Chemical Society Reviews, 2014, 43(8): 2841–2857Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Deng D, Novoselov K S, Fu Q, Zheng N, Tian Z, Bao X. Catalysis with two-dimensional materials and their heterostructures. Nature Nanotechnology, 2016, 11(3): 218–230Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Dai L, Xue Y, Qu L, Choi H J, Baek J B. Metal-free catalysts for oxygen reduction reaction. Chemical Reviews, 2015, 115(11): 4823–4892Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Shinde S S, Lee C H, Sami A, Kim D H, Lee S U, Lee J H. Scalable 3-D carbon nitride sponge as an efficient metal-free bifunctional oxygen electrocatalyst for rechargeable Zn-Air batteries. ACS Nano, 2017, 11(1): 347–357Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Huang P Y, Ruiz-Vargas C S, van der Zande A M, Whitney W S, Levendorf MP, Kevek J W, Garg S, Alden J S, Hustedt C J, Zhu Y, et al. Grains and grain boundaries in single-layer graphene atomic patchwork quilts. Nature, 2011, 469(7330): 389–392Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Novoselov K S, Geim A K, Morozov S V, Jiang D, Zhang Y, Dubonos S V, Grigorieva I V, Firsov A A. Electric field effect in atomically thin carbon films. Science, 2004, 306(5696): 666–669Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Tang P, Hu G, Li M, Ma D. Graphene-based metal-free catalysts for catalytic reactions in the liquid phase. ACS Catalysis, 2016, 6 (10): 6948–6958Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Ma Y, Chen Y. Three-dimensional graphene networks: Synthesis, properties and applications. National Science Review, 2015, 2(1): 40–53Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Senthilkumar K, Prabakar S R, Park C, Jeong S, Lah M S, Pyo M. Graphene oxide self-assembled with a cationic fullerene for high performance pseudo-capacitors. Journal of Materials Chemistry. A, Materials for Energy and Sustainability, 2016, 4(5): 1663–1670Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Kim J, Sang W K, Yun H, Kim B J. Impact of size control of graphene oxide nanosheets for enhancing electrical and mechanical properties of carbon nanotube-polymer composites. RSC Advances, 2017, 7(48): 30221–30228Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Ambrosetti A, Silvestrelli P L. Adsorption of rare-gas atoms and water on graphite and graphene by van der waals-corrected density functional theory. Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 2017, 115(9): 3695–3702Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Esfandiyari T, Nasirizadeh N, Dehghani M, Ehrampoosh M H. Graphene oxide based carbon composite as adsorbent for Hg removal: Preparation, characterization, kinetics and isotherm studies. Chinese Journal of Chemical Engineering, 2017, 25(9): 1170–1175Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Kato R, Minami S, Koga Y, Hasegawa M. High growth rate chemical vapor deposition of graphene under low pressure by RF plasma assistance. Carbon, 2016, 96: 1008–1013Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Kim S, Song Y, Heller M J. Seamless aqueous arc discharge process for producing graphitic carbon nanostructures. Carbon, 2017, 120: 83–88Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Patil I M, Lokanathan M, Kakade B. Three dimensional nanocomposite of reduced graphene oxide and hexagonal boron nitride as an efficient metal-free catalyst for oxygen electroreduction. Journal of Materials Chemistry. A, Materials for Energy and Sustainability, 2016, 4(12): 4506–4515Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Tam T V, Kang S G, Babu K F, Oh E S, Leeb S G, Choi W M. Synthesis of B-doped graphene quantum dots as metal-free electrocatalyst for oxygen reduction reaction. Journal of Materials Chemistry. A, Materials for Energy and Sustainability, 2017, 5(21): 10537–10543Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Lerf A, He H, Forster M, Klinowski J. Structure of graphite oxide revisited. Journal of Physical Chemistry B, 1998, 102(23): 4477–4482Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Haag D R, Kung H H. Metal free graphene based catalysts: A review. Topics in Catalysis, 2014, 57(6–9): 762–773Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Tu W, Zhou Y, Zou Z. Versatile graphene-promoting photocatalytic performance of semiconductors: Basic principles, synthesis, solar energy conversion, and environmental applications. Advanced Functional Materials, 2013, 23(40): 4996–5008Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Shao P, Tian J, Yang F, Duan X, Gao S, Shi W, Luo X, Cui F, Luo S, Wang S. Identification and regulation of active sites on nanodiamonds: Establishing a highly efficient catalytic system for oxidation of organic contaminants. Advanced Functional Materials, 2018, 28(13): 1705295–1705302Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Hummers W S Jr, Offeman R E. Preparation of graphitic oxide. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 1958, 80(6): 1339–1339Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Chen J, Li Y, Huang L, Li C, Shi G. High-yield preparation of graphene oxide from small graphite flakes via an improved Hummers method with a simple purification process. Carbon, 2015, 81(1): 826–834Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Bai J, Sun H, Yin X, Yin X, Wang S, Creamer A E, Xu L, Qin Z, He F, Gao B. Oxygen-content-controllable graphene oxide from electron-beam-irradiated graphite: Synthesis, characterization, and removal of aqueous lead. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 2016, 8(38): 25289–25296 (Pb(II))Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Gao Y J, Hu G, Zhong J, Shi Z J, Zhu Y S, Su D S, Wang J G, Bao X H, Ma D. Nitrogen-doped sp2-hybridized carbon as a superior catalyst for selective oxidation. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 2013, 52(7): 2109–2113Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Kumar R, Singh R K, Vaz A R, Savu R, Moshkalev S A. Selfassembled and one-step synthesis of interconnected 3D network of Fe3O4/reduced graphene oxide nanosheets hybrid for high performance supercapacitor electrode. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 2017, 9(10): 8880–8890Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Hu G, Xu C, Sun Z, Wang S, Cheng H M, Li F, Ren W. 3D graphene-foam-reduced-graphene-oxide hybrid nested hierarchical networks for high-performance Li-S batteries. Advanced Materials, 2016, 28(8): 1603–1609Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Mu X, Yuan B, Feng X, Qiu S, Song L, Hu Y. The effect of doped heteroatoms (nitrogen, boron, phosphorus) on inhibition thermal oxidation of reduced graphene oxide. RSC Advances, 2016, 6 (107): 105021–105029Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Aunkor MH, Mahbubul I M, Saidurb R, Metselaar H C. The green reduction of graphene oxide. RSC Advances, 2016, 6(33): 27807–27828Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Sykam N, Rao G M. Room temperature synthesis of reduced graphene oxide nanosheets as anode material for supercapacitors. Materials Letters, 2014, 204: 169–172Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Kong X K, Sun Z, Chen M, Chen C, Chen Q W. Metal-free catalytic reduction of 4-nitrophenol to 4-aminophenol by N-doped graphene. Energy & Environmental Science, 2013, 6(11): 3260–3266Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Xu K, Fu Y, Zhou Y, Hennersdorf F, Machata P, Vincon I, Weigand J J, Popov A A, Berger R, Feng X. Cationic nitrogendoped helical nanographenes. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 2017, 56(50): 15876–15881Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Tao H, Yan C, Robertson A W, Gao Y, Ding J, Zhang Y, Maa T, Sun Z. N-doping of graphene oxide at low temperature for the oxygen reduction reaction. Chemical Communications, 2017, 53 (5): 873–876Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Wang X, Sun G, Routh P, Kim D H, Huang W, Chen P. Heteroatom-doped graphene materials: Syntheses, properties and applications. Chemical Society Reviews, 2014, 43(20): 7067–7098Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Wei D, Liu Y, Wang Y, Zhang H, Huang L, Yu G. Synthesis of Ndoped graphene by chemical vapor deposition and its electrical properties. Nano Letters, 2009, 9(5): 1752–1758Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Vineesh T V, Kumar M P, Takahashi C, Kalita G, Alwarappan S, Pattanayak D K, Narayanan T N. Bifunctional electrocatalytic activity of boron-doped graphene derived from boron carbide. Advanced Energy Materials, 2015, 5(17): 1500658–1500665Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Putri L K, Ng B J, Ong W J, Lee H W, Chang W S, Chai S P. Heteroatom nitrogen- and boron-doping as a facile strategy to improve photocatalytic activity of standalone reduced graphene oxide in hydrogen evolution. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 2017, 9(5): 4558–4569Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Fang Y, Wang X. Metal-free boron-containing heterogeneous catalysts. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 2017, 56(49): 15506–15518Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Yu C, Liu Z, Meng X, Lu B, Cui D, Qiu J. Nitrogen and phosphorus dual-doped graphene as a metal-free high-efficiency electrocatalyst for triiodide reduction. Nanoscale, 2016, 8(40): 17458–17464Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Xu J, Shui J, Wang J, Wang M, Liu H K, Dou S X, Jeon I Y, Seo J M, Baek J B, Dai L. Sulfur graphene nanostructured cathodes via ball-milling for highperformance lithium sulfur batteries. ACS Nano, 2014, 8(10): 10920–10930Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Xu J, Jeon I Y, Seo J M, Dou S, Dai L, Baek J B. Edge-selectively halogenated graphene nanoplatelets (XGnPs, X = Cl, Br, or I) prepared by ball-milling and used as anode materials for lithiumion batteries. Advanced Materials, 2014, 26(43): 7317–7323Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Xu J, Ma J, Fan Q, Guo S, Dou S. Recent progress in the design of advanced cathode materials and battery models for high-performance lithium-X (X = O2, S, Se, Te, I2, Br2) batteries. Advanced Materials, 2017, 29(28): 1606454–1606473Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Xiang Z, Cao D, Huang L, Shui J, Wang M, Dai L. Nitrogen-doped holey graphitic carbon from 2D covalent organic polymers for oxygen reduction. Advanced Materials, 2014, 26(2): 3315–3320Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Zhang J, Dai L. Nitrogen, phosphorus, and fluorine tri-doped graphene as a multifunctional catalyst for self-powered electrochemical water splitting. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 2016, 55(42): 13296–13300Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    Du R, Zhao Q, Zhang N, Zhang J. Macroscopic carbon nanotubebased 3D monoliths. Small, 2015, 11(27): 3263–3289Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    Worsley M A, Charnvanichborikarn S, Montalvo E, Shin S J, Tylski E D, Lewicki J P, Nelson A J, Satcher J H Jr, Biener J, Baumann T F, et al. Toward macroscale, isotropic carbons with graphene-sheet-like electrical and mechanical properties. Advanced Functional Materials, 2014, 24(27): 4259–4264Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    Charon E, Rouzaud J N, Aléon J. Graphitization at low temperatures (600–1200 °C) in the presence of iron implications in planetology. Carbon, 2014, 66: 178–190Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    Xia J, Zhang N, Chong S, Li D, Chen Y, Sun C. Three-dimensional porous graphene-like sheets synthesized from biocarbon via lowtemperature graphitization for a supercapacitor. Green Chemistry, 2018, 20(3): 694–700Google Scholar
  64. 64.
    Wang H, Li X B, Gao L, Wu H L, Yang J, Cai L, Ma T B, Tung C H, Wu L Z, Yu G. Three-dimensional graphene networks with abundant sharp edge sites for efficient electrocatalytic hydrogen evolution. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 2018, 57(1): 192–197Google Scholar
  65. 65.
    Ren H, Tang M, Guan B, Wang K, Yang J, Wang F, Wang M, Shan J, Chen Z, Wei D, et al. Hierarchical graphene foam for effcient omnidirectional solar-thermal energy conversion. Advanced Materials, 2017, 29(38): 1702590–1702596Google Scholar
  66. 66.
    Shao Y, El-Kady M F, Lin C W, Zhu G, Marsh K L, Hwang J Y, Zhang Q, Li Y, Wang H, Kaner R B. 3D freeze-casting of cellular graphene films for ultrahigh-power-density supercapacitors. Advanced Materials, 2016, 28(31): 6719–6726Google Scholar
  67. 67.
    Compton B G, Lewis J A. 3D-printing of lightweight cellular composites. Advanced Materials, 2014, 26(34): 5930–5935Google Scholar
  68. 68.
    Zhu C, Han T Y, Duoss E B, Golobic A M, Kuntz J D, Spadaccini C M, Worsley M A. Highly compressible 3D periodic graphene aerogel microlattices. Nature Communications, 2015, 6(1): 6962–6969Google Scholar
  69. 69.
    Sha J, Li Y, Salvatierra R V, Wang T, Dong P, Ji Y, Lee S K, Zhang C, Zhang J, Smith R H, et al. Three-dimensional printed graphene foams. ACS Nano, 2017, 11(7): 6860–6867Google Scholar
  70. 70.
    Qi W, Yan P, Su D S. Oxidative dehydrogenation on nanocarbon: Insights into the reaction mechanism and kinetics via in situ experimental methods. Accounts of Chemical Research, 2018, 51 (3): 640–648Google Scholar
  71. 71.
    Guo X, Qi W, Liu W, Yan P, Li F, Liang C, Su D S. Oxidative dehydrogenation on nanocarbon: Revealing the catalytic mechanism using model catalysts. ACS Catalysis, 2017, 7(2): 1424–1427Google Scholar
  72. 72.
    Liu W, Chen B, Duan X, Wu K H, Qi W, Guo X, Zhang B, Su D S. Molybdenum carbide modified nanocarbon catalysts for alkane dehydrogenation reactions. ACS Catalysis, 2017, 7(9): 5820–5827Google Scholar
  73. 73.
    Yang X, Cao Y, Yu H, Huang H, Wang H, Peng F. Unravelling the radical transition during the carbon-catalyzed oxidation of cyclohexane by in situ electron paramagnetic resonance in the liquid phase. Catalysis Science & Technology, 2017, 7(9): 4431–4443Google Scholar
  74. 74.
    Yang J H, Sun G, Gao Y, Zhao H, Tang P, Tan J, Lu A H, Ma D. Direct catalytic oxidation of benzene to phenol over metal-free graphene-based catalyst. Energy & Environmental Science, 2013, 6(3): 793–798Google Scholar
  75. 75.
    Indrawirawan S, Sun H, Duan X, Wang S. Low temperature combustion synthesis of nitrogen-doped graphene for metal-free catalytic oxidation. Journal of Materials Chemistry. A, Materials for Energy and Sustainability, 2015, 3(7): 3432–3440Google Scholar
  76. 76.
    Duan X, O’Donnell K, Sun H, Wang Y, Wang S. Sulfur and nitrogen co-doped graphene for metal-free catalytic oxidation reactions. Small, 2015, 11(25): 3036–3044Google Scholar
  77. 77.
    Huang Z F, Bao H W, Yao Y Y, Lu W Y, Chen W X. Novel green activation processes and mechanism of peroxymonosulfate based on supported cobalt phthalocyanine catalyst. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 2014, 154: 36–43Google Scholar
  78. 78.
    Diao J, Liu H, Wang J, Feng Z, Chen T, Miao C, Yang W, Su D S. Porous graphene-based material as an efficient metal free catalyst for the oxidative dehydrogenation of ethylbenzene to styrene. Chemical Communications, 2015, 51(16): 3423–3425Google Scholar
  79. 79.
    Dhakshinamoorthy A, Latorre-Sanchez M, Asiri A M, Primo A, Garcia H. Sulphur-doped graphene as metal-free carbocatalysts for the solventless aerobic oxidation of styrenes. Catalysis Communications, 2015, 65: 10–13Google Scholar
  80. 80.
    Gonçalves G B, Pires S G, Simoes M Q, Nevesb M S, Marques P P. Three-dimensional graphene oxide: A promising green and sustainable catalyst for oxidation reactions at room temperature. Chemical Communications, 2014, 50(57): 7673–7676Google Scholar
  81. 81.
    Long J, Xie X, Xu J, Gu Q, Chen L, Wang X. Nitrogen-doped graphene nanosheets as metal-free catalysts for aerobic selective oxidation of benzylic alcohols. ACS Catalysis, 2012, 2(4): 622–631Google Scholar
  82. 82.
    Rizescu C, Podolean I, Albero J, Parvulescu V I, Coman S M, Bucur C, Puchec M. Garcia H. N-Doped graphene as a metal-free catalyst for glucose oxidation to succinic acid. Green Chemistry, 2017, 19(8): 1999–2005Google Scholar
  83. 83.
    Gu Q, Wen G, Ding Y, Wu K H, Chen C, Su D. Reduced graphene oxide: A metal-free catalyst for aerobic oxidative desulfurization. Green Chemistry, 2017, 19(4): 1175–1181Google Scholar
  84. 84.
    Gu S, Wunder S, Lu Y, Ballauff M, Fenger R, Rademann K, Jaquet B, Zaccone A. Kinetic analysis of the catalytic reduction of 4 nitrophenol by metallic nanoparticles. Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 2014, 118(32): 18618–18625Google Scholar
  85. 85.
    Wang Z, Su R, Wang D, Shi J, Wang J X, Pu Y, Chen J F. Sulfurized graphene as efficient metal-free catalysts for reduction of 4-nitrophenol to 4-aminophenol. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2017, 56(46): 13610–13617Google Scholar
  86. 86.
    Liu J, Yan X, Wang L, Kong L, Jian P. Three-dimensional nitrogen-doped graphene foam as metal-free catalyst for the hydrogenation reduction of p-nitrophenol. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 2017, 497: 102–107Google Scholar
  87. 87.
    Pan J, Song S, Li J, Wang F, Ge X, Yao S, Wang X, Zhang H. Solid ion transition route to 3D S-N-codoped hollow carbon nanosphere/graphene aerogel as a metal-free handheld nanocatalyst for organic reactions. Nano Research, 2017, 10(10): 3486–3495Google Scholar
  88. 88.
    Qiu B, Xing M, Zhang J. Recent advances in three-dimensional graphene based materials for catalysis applications. Chemical Society Reviews, 2018, 47(6): 2165–2216Google Scholar
  89. 89.
    Wang Z, Pu Y, Wang D, Shi J, Wang J X, Chen J F. 3D-foamstructured nitrogen-doped graphene-Ni catalyst for highly efficient nitrobenzene reduction. AIChE Journal. American Institute of Chemical Engineers, 2018, 64(4): 1330–1338Google Scholar
  90. 90.
    Gao Y, Ma D, Wang C, Guan J, Bao X. Reduced graphene oxide as a catalyst for hydrogenation of nitrobenzene at room temperature. Chemical Communications, 2011, 47(8): 2432–2434Google Scholar
  91. 91.
    Yang F, Chi C, Wang C, Wang Y, Li Y. High graphite N content in nitrogen-doped graphene as an efficient metal-free catalyst for reduction of nitroarenes in water. Green Chemistry, 2016, 18(15): 4254–4262Google Scholar
  92. 92.
    Hu F, Patel M, Luo F, Flach C, Mendelsohn R, Garfunkel E, He H, Szostak M. Graphene-catalyzed direct friedel-crafts alkylation reactions: mechanism, selectivity, and synthetic utility. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2015, 137(45): 14473–14480Google Scholar
  93. 93.
    Gao Y, Tang P, Zhou H, Zhang W, Yang H, Yan N, Hu G, Mei D, Wang J, Ma D. Graphene oxide catalyzed C–H bond activation: The importance of oxygen functional groups for biaryl construction. Angewandte Chemie, 2016, 128(9): 3176–3180Google Scholar
  94. 94.
    Yang A, Li J, Zhang C, Zhang W, Ma N. One-step amine modification of graphene oxide to get a green trifunctional metalfree catalyst. Applied Surface Science, 2015, 346: 443–450Google Scholar
  95. 95.
    Li X H, Antonietti M. Polycondensation of boron- and nitrogencodoped holey graphene monoliths from molecules: Carbocatalysts for selective oxidation. Angewandte Chemie, 2013, 52(17): 4670–4674Google Scholar
  96. 96.
    Yang F, Fan X, Wang C, Yang W, Hou L, Xu X, Feng A, Dong S, Chen K, Wang Y, et al. P-doped nanomesh graphene with highsurface-area as an efficient metal-free catalyst for aerobic oxidative coupling of amines. Carbon, 2017, 121: 443–451Google Scholar
  97. 97.
    Lan D H, Chen L, Au C T, Yin S F. One-pot synthesized multifunctional graphene oxide as a water-tolerant and efficient metalfree heterogeneous catalyst for cycloaddition reaction. Carbon, 2015, 93: 22–31Google Scholar
  98. 98.
    Lacroix M, Dreibine L, Tymowski B, Vigneron F, Edouard D, Bégin D, Nguyen P, Pham C, Savin-Poncet S, Luck F, Ledoux M J, Pham-Huu C. Silicon carbide foam composite containing cobalt as a highly selective and re-usable Fischer-ropsch synthesis catalyst. Applied Catalysis A, General, 2011, 397(1): 62–72Google Scholar
  99. 99.
    Li X, Pan X, Yu L, Ren P, Wu X, Sun L, Jiao F, Bao X. Silicon carbide-derived carbon nanocomposite as a substitute for mercury in the catalytic hydrochlorination of acetylene. Nature Communications, 2014, 5(1): 3688–3694Google Scholar
  100. 100.
    Haase S, Weiss M, Langsch R, Bauer T, Lange R. Hydrodynamics and mass transfer in three-phase composite minichannel fixed-bed reactors. Chemical Engineering Science, 2013, 94(5): 224–236Google Scholar
  101. 101.
    Leung P C, Recasens F, Smith J M. Hydration of isobutene in a trickle-bed reactor: Wetting efficiency and mass transfer. AIChE Journal. American Institute of Chemical Engineers, 1987, 33(6): 996–1007Google Scholar
  102. 102.
    Leveneur S, Wärnå J, Salmi T, Murzin D Y, Estel L. Interaction of intrinsic kinetics and internal mass transfer in porous ion-exchange catalysts: Green synthesis of peroxycarboxylic acids. Chemical Engineering Science, 2009, 64(19): 4101–4114Google Scholar
  103. 103.
    Chu G W, Song Y J, Zhang WJ, Luo Y, Zou H K, Xiang Y, Chen J F. Micromixing efficiency enhancement in a rotating packed bed reactor with surface-modified nickel foam packing. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2015, 54(5): 1697–1702Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Zhiyong Wang
    • 1
    • 2
  • Yuan Pu
    • 1
    • 2
  • Dan Wang
    • 1
    • 2
  • Jie-Xin Wang
    • 1
    • 2
  • Jian-Feng Chen
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Beijing Advanced Innovation Center for Soft Matter Science and Engineering, State Key Laboratory of Organic-Inorganic CompositesBeijing University of Chemical TechnologyBeijingChina
  2. 2.Research Center of the Ministry of Education for High Gravity Engineering and TechnologyBeijing University of Chemical TechnologyBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations