To describe our institution’s initial experience with radical (RN) and partial nephrectomy (PN) using the SP robotic system. The recent FDA approval of the da Vinci® SP robotic platform has led to its use in minimally invasive approaches to urologic malignancies. There are little data on its feasibility and safety after implementation for radical and partial nephrectomy. All patients who underwent PN or RN using the SP system at our institution were reviewed. All PNs were performed off-clamp. Patient demographics, preoperative imaging, operative approaches, and perioperative outcomes were collected and analyzed. Sixteen patients underwent PN (n = 13) or RN (n = 3) utilizing the SP robotic system between January 2019 and June 2019. Average age was 58.6 ± 13.9 and 61.0 ± 1.7 years in each group, respectively. A retroperitoneal approach was performed in 7 (53.8%) PN patients and 1 (33.3%) RN patient. A transperitoneal approach was performed in 6 (46.1%) PNs and 2 (66.7%) RNs. Mean operative time and median estimated blood loss for PN was 176.9 ± 64.0 min and 200 (50–800) ml compared to 176.3 ± 73.8 min and 50 (50–400) ml for RN. There was one operative conversion (7.7%) to an open approach in the PN group. Length of hospital stay postoperatively averaged 1.9 ± 1.3 days and 3.3 ± 1.2 days for patients undergoing partial and radical nephrectomy, respectively. SP partial and radical nephrectomies through transperitoneal and retroperitoneal approaches appear to be feasible surgical techniques in the management of cortical renal masses. Off-clamp PN is also a feasible approach using the SP system. However, further study is needed to establish its safety and use in renal surgery across multiple institutions and larger patient cohorts.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price includes VAT for USA
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
This is the net price. Taxes to be calculated in checkout.
Kaouk JH, Autorino R, Kim FJ, Han DH, Lee SW (2011) Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery in urology: worldwide multi-institutional analysis of 1076 cases. Eur Urol 60:998–1005. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2011.06.002
Kaouk JH, Goel RK, Haber GP, Crouzet S, Stein RJ (2009) Robotic single-port transumbilical surgery in humans: initial report. BJU Int 103:366–369. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410X.2008.07949.x
Nelson RJ, Chavali JSS, Yerram N, Babbar P, Kaouk JH (2017) Current status of robotic single-port surgery. Urol Ann 9:217–222. https://doi.org/10.4103/UA.UA_51_17
Bertolo R, Garisto J, Gettman M, Kaouk J (2018) Novel system for robotic single-port surgery: feasibility and state of the art in urology. Eur Urol Focus 4:669–673. https://doi.org/10.4103/UA.UA_51_17
Kaouk J, Bertolo R, Eltemamy M, Garisto J (2019) Single-port robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: first clinical experience using the SP surgical system. Urology 124:309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2018.10.025
Kaouk J, Garisto J, Bertolo R (2019) Robotic urological surgical interventions performed with the single port dedicated platform: first clinical investigation. Eur Urol 75:684–691. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2018.11.044
Agarwal DK, Sharma V, Toussi A, Viers BR, Tollefson MK et al (2019) Initial experience with da Vinci single-port robot-assisted radical prostatectomies. Eur Urol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2019.04.001
Dobbs RW, Halgrimson WR, Madueke I, Vigneswaran HT, Wilson JO, Crivellaro S (2019) Single-port robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: initial experience and technique with the da Vinci SP platform. BJU Int. https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.14864
Schwartz MJ, Rais-Bahrami S, Kavoussi LR (2015) Laparoscopic and robotic surgery of the kidney. In: Campbell-Walsh Urology, 11th edn., vol 2. Elsevier, Inc., pp 1446–1483
Kutikov A, Uzzo RG (2009) The R.E.N.A.L nephrometry score: a comprehensive standardized system for quantitating renal tumor size, location, and depth. J Urol 182:844–853. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2009.05.035
Greco F, Autorino R, Rha KH, Derweesh I, Cindolo L et al (2013) Laparoendoscopic single-site partial nephrectomy: a multi-institutional outcome analysis. Eur Urol 64:314–322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2013.01.025
Springer C, Greco F, Autorino R, Rha KH, Derweesh I, Cindolo L et al (2013) Analysis of oncological outcomes and renal function after laparoendoscopic single-site (LESS) partial nephrectomy: a multi-institutional outcome analysis. BJU Int 113:266–274. https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.12376
Rais-Bahrami S, Montag S, Atalla MA, Andonian S, Kavoussi LR, Richstone L (2009) Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery of the kidney with no accessory trocars: an initial experience. J Endourol 23:1319–1324. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2009.0065
Maurice MJ, Ramirez D, Kaouk JH (2017) Robotic laparoendoscopic single-site retroperitoneal renal surgery: initial investigation of a purpose-built single-port surgical system. Eur Urol 71:643–647. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2016.06.005
Kaouk J, Garisto J, Eltemamy M, Bertolo R (2019) Pure single-site robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy using the SP surgical system: initial clinical experience. Urology 124:282–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2018.11.024
Xia L, Zhang X, Wang X, Xu T, Qin L, Zhang X et al (2016) Transperitoneal versus retroperitoneal robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Surg 30:109–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2016.04.023
Mittakanti HR, Heulitt G, Li HF, Porter JR (2019) Transperitoneal vs. retroperitoneal robotic partial nephrectomy: a matched-paired analysis. World J Urol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-019-02903-7
Rais-Bahrami S, George AK, Herati A et al (2012) Off-clamp versus complete hilar control laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: comparison by clinical stage. BJU Int 109:1376–1381. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10592.x
Cacciamani GE, Medina LG, Gill TS et al (2019) Impact of renal hilar control on outcomes of robotic partial nephrectomy: systematic review and cumulative meta-analysis. Eur Urol Focus 5:619–635. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euf.2018.01.012
Thompson RH, Lane BR, Lohse CM et al (2010) Every minute counts when the renal hilum is clamped during partial nephrectomy. Eur Urol 58:340–345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2010.05.047
Volpe A, Blute ML, Ficarra V et al (2015) Renal ischemia and function after partial nephrectomy: a collaborative review of the literature. Eur Urol 68:61–74. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-019-02879-4
Mir MC, Autorino R, Porpiglia F (2018) Ischemia time and beyond: the concept of global renal damage. Minerva Urol Nefrol 70:447–449. https://doi.org/10.23736/S0393-2249.18.03253-8
Antonelli A, Cindolo L, Sandri M, Bertolo R, Annino F et al (2019) Safety of on- vs off-clamp robotic partial nephrectomy: per-protocol analysis from the data of the CLOCK randomized trial. World J Urol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-019-02879-4
Conflict of interest
Jeffrey W. Nix, M.D. serves as a consultant for Philips/InVivo Corp and Intuitive Surgical. Soroush Rais-Bahrami, M.D. serves as a consultant for Philips/InVivo Corp, Intuitive Surgical, Genomic Health Inc, Bayer Healthcare, and Blue Earth Diagnostics.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were approved by the University of Alabama at Birmingham Institutional Review Board and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Fang, A.M., Saidian, A., Magi-Galluzzi, C. et al. Single-port robotic partial and radical nephrectomies for renal cortical tumors: initial clinical experience. J Robotic Surg (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-020-01053-y
- Kidney cancer
- Renal surgery
- Partial nephrectomy