Advertisement

Reconstruction of TORS oropharyngectomy defects with the nasoseptal flap via transpalatal tunnel

  • Meghan T. TurnerEmail author
  • Mathew Geltzeiler
  • W. Greer Albergotti
  • Umamaheswar Duvvuri
  • Robert L. Ferris
  • Seungwon Kim
  • Eric W. Wang
Original Article
  • 1 Downloads

Abstract

The nasoseptal flap (NSF) has been described as reconstructive option for soft palate defects following transoral robotic surgery (TORS). As described, this technique is does not provide adequate coverage of the lateral oropharyngeal wall, parapharyngeal space, exposed vessels, or exposed mandibular bone. The NSF for TORS reconstruction has been limited to soft palate reconstruction, given the limitations on length when passed via the nasopharynx. In this article, we describe (1) a novel technique for TORS reconstruction using direct transposition of the ipsilateral NSF into the oropharynx via a transpalatal tunnel at the hard–soft palate junction, and (2) its use in select patients.

Keywords

Nasoseptal flap (NSF) Transoral robotic surgery (TORS) Robotic oropharyngectomy Robotic-assisted reconstruction Oropharyngeal reconstruction 

Notes

Funding

The project was funded by SPORE Grant P50 CA097190 and T32 Grant CA060397, PI: Dr. Robert L. Ferris, MD, PhD, FACS. Statistical analysis was performed by Jad Ramadan, MS in the Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery West Virginia University.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

Robert L. Ferris, MD, PhD has the following disclosures: Amgen (Advisory Board); Astra-Zeneca/MedImmune (Advisory Board, Clinical trial, Research Funding); Bristol-Myers Squibb (Advisory board, Clinical trial, Research funding); EMD Serono (Advisory Board); Benetic (Advisory Board); Lilly (Advisory Board); Merck (Advisory Board, Clinical trial); Pfizer (Advisory Board); VentiRx Pharmaceuticals (Research funding). Meghan T. Turner, Mathew Geltzeiler, MD, W. Greer Albergotti, MD, Umamaheswar Duvvuri, MD, PhD, Seungwon Kim, MD, Eric W. Wang, MD, declare that they have no conflicts of interest. The NSF provides excellent local flap reconstruction for lateral oropharyngectomy defects following TORS. This is the first description of a laterally-based, pedicled NSF design utilization for ICA coverage during transoral surgery. This required minimal additional surgical time and was effective in preventing acute or delayed ICA bleeding. Additionally, it postoperative healing. Although reported here only during TORS oropharyngectomy, it is intuitive that this technique also applies to transoral laser microsurgery.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study per institutional protocols.

Supplementary material

Supplementary material 1 (MP4 127971 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Hadad G, Bassagasteguy L, Carrau RL, Mataza JC, Kassam A, Snyderman CH, Mintz A (2006) A novel reconstructive technique after endoscopic expanded endonasal approaches: vascular pedicle nasoseptal flap. Laryngoscope 116(10):1882–1886.  https://doi.org/10.1097/01.mlg.0000234933.37779.e4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Peris-Celda M, Pinheiro-Neto CD, Funaki T, Fernandez-Miranda JC, Gardner P, Snyderman C, Rhoton AL (2013) The extended nasoseptal flap for skull base reconstruction of the clival region: an anatomical and radiological study. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base 74(6):369–385.  https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0033-1347368 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    D’Anza B, Tien D, Stokken JK, Recinos PF, Woodard TR, Sindwani R (2016) Role of lumbar drains in contemporary endonasal skull base surgery: meta-analysis and systematic review. Am J Rhinol Allergy 30(6):430–435.  https://doi.org/10.2500/ajra.2016.30.4377 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Zanation AM, Carrau RL, Snyderman CH, Germanwala AV, Gardner PA, Prevedello DM, Kassam AB (2009) Nasoseptal flap reconstruction of high flow intraoperative cerebral spinal fluid leaks during endoscopic skull base surgery. Am J Rhinol Allergy 23(5):518–521.  https://doi.org/10.2500/ajra.2009.23.3378 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Rivera-Serrano CM, Lentz AK, Pinheiro-Neto C, Snyderman CH (2013) Cadaveric study of the posterior pedicle nasoseptal flap: a novel flap for reconstruction of pharyngeal defects and velopharyngeal insufficiency. Plast Reconstr Surg 132(5):1269–1275.  https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182a4c37b CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Pinheiro-Neto CD, Galati LT (2016) Nasoseptal flap for reconstruction after robotic radical tonsillectomy. Head Neck 38(9):E2495–E2498.  https://doi.org/10.1002/hed.24483 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    de Almeida JR, Park RC, Genden EM (2012) Reconstruction of transoral robotic surgery defects: principles and techniques. J Reconstr Microsurg 28(7):465–472.  https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0032-1313762 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Genden EM, Park R, Smith C, Kotz T (2011) The role of reconstruction for transoral robotic pharyngectomy and concomitant neck dissection. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 137(2):151–156.  https://doi.org/10.1001/archoto.2010.250 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    de Almeida JR, Park RC, Villanueva NL, Miles BA, Teng MS, Genden EM (2014) Reconstructive algorithm and classification system for transoral oropharyngeal defects. Head Neck 36(7):934–941.  https://doi.org/10.1002/hed.23353 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gillespie MB, Eisele DW (2000) The uvulopalatal flap for reconstruction of the soft palate. Laryngoscope 110(4):612–615.  https://doi.org/10.1097/00005537-200004000-00014 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bonawitz SC, Duvvuri U (2013) Robotic-assisted FAMM flap for soft palate reconstruction. Laryngoscope 123(4):870–874.  https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.23578 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Genden EM, Lee BB, Urken ML (2001) The palatal island flap for reconstruction of palatal and retromolar trigone defects revisited. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 127(7):837–841Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Duvvuri U, Bonawitz SC, Kim S (2013) Robotic-assisted oropharyngeal reconstruction. J Robot Surg 7(1):9–14.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-011-0326-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Day AT, Haughey BH, Rich JT (2017) Prevertebral muscle flap for internal carotid artery coverage during oropharyngeal transoral surgery. Laryngoscope 127(10):2256–2259.  https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.26542 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lee DH, Yoon TM, Lee JK, Lim SC (2017) Nasoseptal flap reconstruction after oropharyngeal cancer resection: a case report. Medicine (Baltimore) 96(44):e8527.  https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000008527 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Weinstein GS, O’Malley BW Jr, Snyder W, Sherman E, Quon H (2007) Transoral robotic surgery: radical tonsillectomy. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 133(12):1220–1226.  https://doi.org/10.1001/archotol.133.12.1220 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Holsinger FC, McWhorter AJ, Menard M, Garcia D, Laccourreye O (2005) Transoral lateral oropharyngectomy for squamous cell carcinoma of the tonsillar region: I. Technique, complications, and functional results. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 131(7):583–591.  https://doi.org/10.1001/archotol.131.7.583 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kimple AJ, Leight WD, Wheless SA, Zanation AM (2012) Reducing nasal morbidity after skull base reconstruction with the nasoseptal flap: free middle turbinate mucosal grafts. Laryngoscope 122(9):1920–1924.  https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.23325 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Byrd JK, Leonardis RL, Bonawitz SC, Losee JE, Duvvuri U (2014) Transoral robotic surgery for pharyngeal stenosis. Int J Med Robot 10(4):418–422.  https://doi.org/10.1002/rcs.1591 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Holsinger FC, Ferris RL (2015) Transoral endoscopic head and neck surgery and its role within the multidisciplinary treatment paradigm of oropharynx cancer: robotics, lasers, and clinical trials. J Clin Oncol 33(29):3285–3292.  https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2015.62.3157 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kubik M, Mandal R, Albergotti W, Duvvuri U, Ferris RL, Kim S (2017) Effect of transcervical arterial ligation on the severity of postoperative hemorrhage after transoral robotic surgery. Head Neck 39(8):1510–1515.  https://doi.org/10.1002/hed.24677 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Meghan T. Turner
    • 1
    Email author
  • Mathew Geltzeiler
    • 2
  • W. Greer Albergotti
    • 3
  • Umamaheswar Duvvuri
    • 4
  • Robert L. Ferris
    • 4
    • 5
  • Seungwon Kim
    • 4
  • Eric W. Wang
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck SurgeryWest Virginia UniversityMorgantownUSA
  2. 2.Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck SurgeryOregon Health Sciences UniversityPortlandUSA
  3. 3.Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck SurgeryAugusta University HealthAugustaUSA
  4. 4.Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck SurgeryUniversity of Pittsburgh Medical CenterPittsburghUSA
  5. 5.Department of ImmunologyUniversity of PittsburghPittsburghUSA

Personalised recommendations