Advertisement

Journal of Robotic Surgery

, Volume 13, Issue 4, pp 585–588 | Cite as

Wearable haptic interfaces for applications in gynecologic robotic surgery: a proof of concept in robotic myomectomy

  • Andrea Giannini
  • Matteo Bianchi
  • Davide Doria
  • Simone Fani
  • Marta Caretto
  • Antonio Bicchi
  • Tommaso SimonciniEmail author
Brief Communication
  • 61 Downloads

Abstract

Uterine fibromatosis is common in women, with an estimated prevalence of up to 15–50% after 35 years. About 80% of women affected by fibromatosis have symptoms and require medical or surgical treatment. Nowadays, the gold standard for the surgical treatment of uterine fibromatosis is the use of minimally invasive surgery. The surgical skills and improvements offered by robotic approach can be relevant in reproductive surgery, in particular in minimally invasive myomectomy. However, the lack of tactile feedback of robotic platform is an important technical drawback that can reduce the accuracy of surgical procedures. Here, we present the design and the preliminary test of the wearable fabric, yielding display wearable haptic interfaces able to generate a real-time tactile feedback in terms of stiffness for applications in gynecologic robotic surgery. We preliminarily tested the device in the simulation of a real scenario of conservative myomectomy with the final purpose of increasing the accuracy and precision during surgery. The future goal is the integration of a haptic device with the commercially available robotic surgical systems with the purpose of improving the precision and accuracy of the surgical operation, thus allowing a better understanding concerning the anatomical relationship of the target structures. This in turn could determine a change in the surgical strategy in some cases, letting some patients selected for a demolitive approach retaining their uterus. This could improve surgical outcomes in fertile women enrolled for minimally invasive surgery for uterine fibroids and may be a facilitation for young gynecological surgeons or during residency teaching plans and learning programs.

Keywords

Robotic surgery Myomectomy Haptic feedback Fertility preservation MIS 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

Andrea Giannini, Matteo Bianchi, Davide Doria, Simone Fani, Marta Caretto, Antonio Bicchi, and Tommaso Simoncini have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

References

  1. 1.
    Frishman GN, Jurema MW (2005) Myomas and myomectomy. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 12:443–456CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Falcone T, Parker WH (2013) Surgical management of leiomyomas for fertility or uterine preservation. Obstet Gynecol 121(4):856–868CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Nieboer TE, Johnson N, Lethaby A, Tavender E, Curr E, Garry R et al (2009) Surgical approach to hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 3:CD003677Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gynecologists, A. C. o. O. a. (2009) ACOG Committee Opinion No. 444. Choosing the route of hysterectomy for benign disease. Obstet Gynecol 114:1156–1158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bhave Chittawar P, Franik S, Pouwer AW, Farquhar C (2014) Minimally invasive surgical techniques versus open myomectomy for uterine fibroids. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 10:CD004638Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sizzi O, Rossetti A, Malzoni M et al (2007) Italian multicenter study on complications of laparoscopic myomectomy. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 14(4):453–462CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gingold JA, Gueye NA, Falcone T (2018) Minimally invasive approaches to myoma management. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 25(2):237–250.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2017.07.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Levine DJ, Berman JM, Harris M, Chudnoff SG, Whaley FS, Palmer SL (2013) Sensitivity of myoma imaging using laparoscopic ultrasound compared with magnetic resonance imaging and transvaginal ultrasound. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 20(6):770–774CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Condino S, Viglialoro RM, Fani S, Bianchi M, Morelli L, Ferrari M, Bicchi A, Ferrari V (2016) Tactile augmented reality for arteries palpation in open surgery training. In: International conference on medical imaging and virtual reality, pp 186–197Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Fani S, Ciotti S, Battaglia E, Moscatelli A, Bianchi M (2017) W-FYD: a wearable fabric-based display for haptic multi-cue delivery and tactile augmented reality. In: IEEE transactions on haptics, p 1Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bianchi M, Battaglia E, Poggiani S, Ciotti S, Bicchi A (2016) A wearable fabric-based display for haptic multi-cue delivery. In: 2016 IEEE haptics symposium (HAPTICS), pp 277–283Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Division of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Department of Clinical and Experimental MedicineUniversity of PisaPisaItaly
  2. 2.Research Center “Enrico Piaggio”University of PisaPisaItaly
  3. 3.Department of Advanced RoboticsIstituto Italiano di TecnologiaGenovaItaly
  4. 4.Department of Information EngineeringUniversity of PisaPisaItaly

Personalised recommendations