Advertisement

Journal of Robotic Surgery

, Volume 13, Issue 4, pp 609–610 | Cite as

New perspectives about the role of robot-assisted surgery for the treatment of endometriosis

  • Niccolò FurbettaEmail author
  • Matteo Bianchini
  • Matteo Palmeri
  • Luca Morelli
Letter to the Editor
  • 55 Downloads

To the Editor:

We read with great interest the recently published article by Comptour et al. entitled “Patient Quality of Life and Symptoms after Surgical Treatment for Endometriosis” [1].

Painful gynecological and digestive symptoms of endometriosis have been shown to severely affect the patients’ quality of life (QoL), and various studies have described the benefits of surgery in the treatment of endometriosis, particularly in its worst presentation, namely, Deep Infiltrating Endometriosis (DIE). Comptour et al. have designed a prospective and multicenter cohort study to assess the impact of surgical treatment of endometriosis on quality of life and pain, and their results seem to confirm these benefits.

A minimally invasive approach is considered, nowadays the gold standard for surgical treatment of endometriosis, as it results in faster recovery, reduced hospital stay, improved cosmetic results, and lower postoperative morbidity if compared to laparotomy [2]. However, in the...

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

Furbetta Niccolò, Bianchini Matteo, Palmeri Matteo, and Morelli Luca declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Comptour A, Chauvet P, Canis M, Grémeau AS, Pouly JL, Rabischong B, Pereira B, Bourdel N (2018) Patient quality of life and symptoms after surgical treatment for endometriosis. J Minim Invasive Gynecol.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2018.08.005 (Epub ahead of print) Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Vitobello D, Fattizzi N, Santoro G, Rosati R, Baldazzi G, Bulletti C, Palmara V (2013) Robotic surgery and standard laparoscopy: a surgical hybrid technique for use in colorectal endometriosis. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 39(1):217–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Siesto G, Ieda N, Rosati R, Vitobello D (2014) Robotic surgery for deep endometriosis: a paradigm shift. Int J Med Robot 10(2):140–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Morelli L, Perutelli A, Palmeri M, Guadagni S, Mariniello MD, Di Franco G, Cela V, Brundu B, Salerno MG, Di Candio G, Mosca F (2016) Robot-assisted surgery for the radical treatment of deep infiltrating endometriosis with colorectal involvement: short- and mid-term surgical and functional outcomes. Int J Colorectal Dis 31:643–652.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-015-2477-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Morelli L, Guadagni S, Lorenzoni V, Di Franco G, Cobuccio L, Palmeri M, Caprili G, D’Isidoro C, Moglia A, Ferrari V, Di Candio G, Mosca F, Turchetti G (2016) Robot-assisted versus laparoscopic rectal resection for cancer in a single surgeon’s experience: a cost analysis covering the initial 50 robotic cases with the da Vinci Si. Int J Colorectal Dis 31(9):1639–1648.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-016-2631-5 (Epub 2016 Jul 31) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Morelli L, Di Franco G, Lorenzoni V, Guadagni S, Palmeri M, Furbetta N, Gianardi D, Bianchini M, Caprili G, Mosca F, Turchetti G, Cuschieri A (2018) Structured cost analysis of robotic TME resection for rectal cancer: a comparison between the da Vinci Si and Xi in a single surgeon’s experience. Surg Endosc.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-018-6465-9 (Epub ahead of print) Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Surgery, Translational and new Technologies in MedicineUniversity of PisaPisaItaly
  2. 2.EndoCAS (Center for Computer Assisted Surgery)University of PisaPisaItaly

Personalised recommendations