Journal of Robotic Surgery

, Volume 13, Issue 3, pp 469–474 | Cite as

Robot-assisted esophageal surgery using the da Vinci® Xi system: operative technique and initial experiences

  • A. PötscherEmail author
  • C. Bittermann
  • F. Längle
Original Article


In this review, we would like to illustrate our experience with the da Vinci® Xi system in case of esophageal surgery. Since the da Vinci® Xi system was installed in our department, it has resulted in a great improvement in cases of minimally invasive surgery. After the successful establishment in the field of colorectal surgery, the next step was surgery of the upper gastrointestinal tract. Due to the features of the robotic system, we can definitely observe the advantages and a positive effect in case of minimal invasive esophagectomy (MIE). We have also tried to develop an adequate surgical standard of the robotic-assisted minimal invasive esophagectomy with the da Vinci® Xi.


Esophageal cancer Robotic surgery Robot-assisted minimal invasive esophagectomy da Vinci® Xi 


Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

Author A. Pötscher, C. Bittermann, and F. Längle declare that they have no conflict of interest.


  1. 1.
    Collard J-M, Lengele B, Otte J-B, Kestens P-J (1993) En Bloc and standard esophagectomies by thoracoscopy. Ann Thorac Surg 56:675–679CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Melvin WS, Needleman BJ, Krause KR, Schneider C, Wolf RK, Michler RE, Ellison EC (2002) Computer-enhanced robotic telesurgery. Initial experience in foregut surgery. Surg Endosc 16:1790–1792CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Brett Broussard J, Evans B, Wei (2016) Robert Cerfolio. Robotic esophagectomy. J Vis Surg 2:139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Straughan DM, Azoury SC, Bennett RD, Pimiento JM, Fontaine JP, Toloza EM (2015) Robotic-assisted esophageal surgery. Cancer Control 22(3):335–339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Puntambekar SP, Rayate N, Joshi S, Agarwal G (2011) Robotic transthoracic esophagectomy in the prone position: experience with 32 patients with esophageal cancer. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 142(5):1283–1284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Yibulayin W, Abulizi S, Lv H, Sun W (2016) Minimally invasive oesophagectomy versus open esophagectomy for resectable esophageal cancer: a meta-analysis. World J Surg Oncol 14:304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bae SU, Baek SJ, Hur H, Baik SH, Kim NK, Min BS (2013) Intraoperative near infrared fluorescence imaging in robotic low anterior resection: three case reports. Yonsei Med J 54(4):1066–1069CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gallagher AG, McClure N, McGuigan J, Ritchie K, Sheehy NP (1998) An ergonomic analysis of the fulcrum effect in the acquisition of endoscopic skills. Endoscopy 30(7):617–620CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lanfranco AR, Castellanos AE, Desai JP, Meyers WC (2004) Robotic surgery: a current perspective. Ann Surg 239:1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kayani B, Garas G, Arshad M, Athanasiou T, Darzi A, Zacharakis E (2014) Is hand-sewn anastomosis superior to stapled anastomosis following oesophagectomy? Int J Surg 12(1):7–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Castro PMV, Ribeiro FPG, Rocha ADF, Mazzurana M, Alvarez GA (2014) Hand-sewn versus stapler esophagogastric anastomosis after esophageal ressection: sistematic review and meta-analysis. Arq Bras Cir Dig 27(3):216–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    van Hillegersberg R, Seesing MFJ, Brenkman HJF, Ruurda JP (2017) Robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy. Der Chirurg 88(Supplement 1):7–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    He H, Wu Q, Wang Z, Zhang Y, Chen N, Fu J, Zhang G (2018) Short-term outcomes of robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a propensity score matched analysis. J Cardiothor Surg 13:52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    van der Sluis PC, Ruurda JP, Verhage RJJ, van der Horst S, Haverkamp L, Siersema PD, Borel Rinkes IHM, van Hillegersberg R (2015) Oncologic long-term results of robot-assisted minimally invasive thoraco-laparoscopic esophagectomy with two-field lymphadenectomy for esophageal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 22:1350–1356CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Surgical DepartmentLandesklinikum Wiener NeustadtWiener NeustadtAustria

Personalised recommendations