Training robotic community surgeons: our experience implementing a robotics curriculum at a rural community general surgery training program
- 87 Downloads
Robotic-assisted surgical procedures are being increasingly used in general surgery, including in the rural and community setting. Although there is no requirement, general surgery residency programs have begun to incorporate curriculums to train residents in this discipline. As a small rural community program, we recently instituted a voluntary and structured curriculum, and our initial experience is shared here. Our curriculum was voluntary for all general surgical residents for the academic years 2016–2017. The curriculum consisted of online training, bedside training, console simulation, bedside assisting, and operating at the console. During the fiscal year of 2016, 193 robot-assisted surgeries performed within the General Surgery Department. Fourteen of fifteen residents participated in the curriculum, with the exception being a resident new to our program. A survey was sent to the residents to evaluate their opinions towards robotic surgery and the curriculum, with 12/15 residents responding. Overall, residents’ impressions were very favorable, with all reporting being either very or mostly satisfied with the curriculum and most, 58.4%, reporting there participating level on the robot to be appropriate. Importantly most, 91.7% did not think that the curriculum put an undue stress on their time or that it was detrimental to other aspects of their training. This study shows that a community rural general surgery program can incorporate a voluntary robotic curriculum effectively with high resident participation and satisfaction.
KeywordsGeneral surgery Residency Training Robotics
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
William Krause WD and Julio Brid MD declare that they have no conflict of interest.
All procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2000 (5).
Informed consent was obtained from all patients for being included in the study.
- 9.Tam V, Lutfi W, Novak S, Hamad A, Lee KK, Zureika AH, Zeh HT, Hogg ME (2017) Resident attitudes and compliance towards robotic surgical training. In The American Journal of Surgery, 2017, ISSN 0002-9610Google Scholar
- 10.Nolan HR, Christie DB, Ashley DW (2015) Comparison of attending and resident surgeons’ opinions of robotic surgery training in general surgery residency. Am Surg 81:303–305Google Scholar
- 12.Salman M, Bell T, Martin J et al (2013) Use, cost, complications, and mortality of robotic versus nonrobotic general surgery procedures based on a nationwide database. Am Surg 79:553–560Google Scholar
- 13.Gujer MW, LeMieur TP, McCollister HM, Roberts SA, Severson PA (2009) Building and maintaining a successful surgery program in rural Minnesota. Surg Clin N Am 89 6:1349–1357, ixGoogle Scholar