Journal of Robotic Surgery

, Volume 12, Issue 4, pp 687–692 | Cite as

Nasopharynx access by minimally invasive transoral robotic surgery: anatomical study

  • Amine Harichane
  • Dorian Chauvet
  • Stéphane Hans
Original Article


This study was made to assess the possibilities and limits of minimally invasive transoral approach to the nasopharynx using the Da Vinci surgical robot. It was conducted on eleven corpses, without need for palatine split; using surgical robots Da Vinci models S HD and Si HD. We have defined “anatomical key landmarks” on all sides of the nasopharynx, to confirm our hypothesis. All of the nasopharynx could be visualized and transorally reached by the robot with a validation of all the key landmarks. The advantages and shortcomings of this technique were discussed, as well as the ability to use those results on human subjects. This study allowed us to show the possibility to access the nasopharynx by minimally invasive transoral robotic surgery. This new technique opens a new field for surgery of the skull base or the nasopharynx.


Transoral robotic surgery Nasopharynx Transoral Robot Minimally invasive surgery 



The authors wish to thank Intuitive Surgical and Antoine Missistrano, the Ecole Européenne de Chirurgie as well as the Centre du Don des Corps de l’Université Paris Descartes, the Ligue contre le Cancer and the Fondation des « Gueules Cassées » for their help, and Mélodie Garcia for her proof-reading.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

Dr. Amine Harichane, Dr. Dorian Chauvet, and Pr. Stéphane Hans declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

Supplementary material 1 (MP4 443620 kb)


  1. 1.
    Lee AW, Law SC, Foo W, Poon YF, Cheung FK, Chan DK, Tung SY, Thaw M, Ho JH (1993) Retrospective analysis of patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma treated during 1976–1985: survival after local recurrence. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 26(5):773–782CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Wei WI, Ho CM, Yuen PW, Fung CF, Sham JS, Lam KH (1995) Maxillary swing approach for resection of tumors in and around the nasopharynx. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 121(6):638–642CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    King WW, Ku PK, Mok CO, Teo PM (2000) Nasopharyngectomy in the treatment of recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a 12-year experience. Head Neck 22(3):215–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Yoshizaki T, Wakisaka N, Murono S, Shimizu Y, Furukawa M (2005) Endoscopic nasopharyngectomy for patients with recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma at the primary site. Laryngoscope 115(8):1517–1519CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Mc Leod IK, Mair EA, Melder PC (2005) Potential application of the Da Vinci minimally invasive surgical robotic system in otolaryngology. Ear Nose Throat J 84:483–487Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hans S, Delas B, Gorphe P, Ménard M, Brasnu D (2012) Transoral robotic surgery in head and neck cancer. Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis 129(1):32–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Weinstein GS, O’malley BW Jr, Hockstein NG (2005) Transoral robotic surgery: supraglottic laryngectomy in a canine model. Laryngoscope 115(7):1315–1319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hockstein NG, O’Malley BW Jr, Weinstein GS (2006) Assessment of intraoperative safety in transoral robotic surgery. Laryngoscope 116(2):165–168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hans S, Badoual C, Gorphe P, Brasnu D (2012) Transoral robotic surgery for head and neck carcinomas. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 269:1979–1984CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    De Almeida JR, Li R, Magnuson JS, Smith RV, Moore E, Lawson G, Remacle M, Ganly I, Kraus DH, Teng MS, Miles BA, White H, Duvvuri U, Ferris RL, Mehta V, Kiyosaki K, Damrose EJ, Wang SJ, Kupferman ME, Koh YW, Genden EM, Holsinger FC (2015) Oncologic outcomes after transoral robotic surgery: a multi-institutional study. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 141(12):1043–1051CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ozer E, Waltonen J (2008) Transoral robotic nasopharyngectomy: a novel approach for nasopharyngeal lesions. Laryngoscope 118(9):1613–1616CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Wei WI, Ho WK (2010) Transoral robotic resection of recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Laryngoscope 120(10):2011–2014CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Tsang RK, Mohr C (2013) Lateral palatal flap approach to the nasopharynx and parapharyngeal space for transoral robotic surgery: a cadaveric study. J Robot Surg 7(2):119–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Chauvet D, Missistrano A, Hivelin M, Carpentier A, Cornu P, Hans S (2014) Transoral robotic-assisted skull base surgery to approach the sella turcica: cadaveric study. Neurosurg Rev 37(4):609–617CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    O’Malley BW Jr, Weinstein GS (2007) Robotic anterior and midline skull base surgery: preclinical investigations. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 69(2 Sup):S125–S128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    O’Malley BW Jr, Weinstein GS (2007) Robotic skull base surgery: preclinical investigations to human clinical applications. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 133:1215–1219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lee JY, O’Malley BW Jr, Newman JG, Weinstein GS, Lega B, Diaz J, Grady MS (2010) Transoral robotic surgery of the skull base: a cadaver and feasibility study. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec 72:181–187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Amelot A, Trunet S, Degos V, André O, Dionnet A, Cornu P, Hans S, Chauvet D (2015) Anatomical features of skull base and oral cavity: a pilot study to determine the accessibility of the sella by transoral robotic-assisted surgery. Neurosurg Rev 38(4):723–730CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Chan JY, Wei WI (2012) Critical appraisal of maxillary swing approach for nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Expert Opin Ther Targets 16(Suppl 1):S111–S117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Vlantis AC, Lee DL, Wong EW, Chow SM, Ng SK, Chan JY (2016) Endoscopic nasopharyngectomy in recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a case series, literature review, and pooled analysis. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Trévillot V, Garrel R, Dombre E, Poignet P, Sobral R, Crampette L (2013) Robotic endoscopic sinus and skull base surgery: review of the literature and future prospects. Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis 130(4):201–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Richmon JD (2015) Transoral palate-sparing nasopharyngectomy with the Flex® System: preclinical study. Laryngoscope 125(2):318–322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Tsang RK, Holsinger FC (2016) Transoral endoscopic nasopharyngectomy with a flexible next-generation robotic surgical system. Laryngoscope 126(10):2257–2262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Tsang RK, Sorger JM, Azizian M, Holsinger CF (2015) Real-time navigation in transoral robotic nasopharyngectomy utilizing on table fluoroscopy and image overlay software: a cadaveric feasibility study. J Robot Surg 9(4):311–314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Simon F, Vacher C, Herman P, Verillaud B (2016) Surgical landmarks of the nasopharyngeal internal carotid using the maxillary swing approach: a cadaveric study. Laryngoscope 126(7):1562–1566CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Yin Tsang RK, Ho WK, Wei WI (2012) Combined transnasal endoscopic and transoral robotic resection of recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Head Neck 34(8):1190–1193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Chauvet D, Hans S, Missistrano A, Rebours C, Bakkouri WE, Lot G (2016) Transoral robotic surgery for sellar tumors: first clinical study. J Neurosurg 23:1–8Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Chauvet D, Hans S, Lot G (2016) Abord transoral des adénomes hypophysaires assisté par le robot: premiers patients. Ann Endocinol Paris 77(4):298Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck SurgeryParis Pierre et Marie Curie UniversityParisFrance
  2. 2.Department of NeurosurgeryFondation Ophtalmologique Adolphe de RothschildParisFrance
  3. 3.Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, AP-HP Hôpital Européen Georges PompidouParis Descartes UniversityParisFrance
  4. 4.MontrougeFrance

Personalised recommendations