Advertisement

Journal of Robotic Surgery

, Volume 13, Issue 4, pp 605–606 | Cite as

Should we use virtual simulators for surgical resident selection?

  • Luca Morelli
  • Gregorio Di FrancoEmail author
  • Andrea Moglia
  • Alfred Cuschieri
Letter to the Editor
  • 83 Downloads

To the Editor:

We read with great interest the article by Gardner et al. entitled “How Much Are We Spending on Resident Selection?” [1]. The authors draw attention to the importance of a rigorous selection process to recruit applicants who would be best suited for a surgical career. In their analysis, authors stress the significant time and resources currently spent in the resident selection process, with the average program spending approximately $100,000 annually. Moreover, the authors highlight the burden in man hours and effort spent by Residency Coordinators in the screening and selection process, averaging 132 h. Against this background, Gardner et al. argue that Surgical Program Directors should assess the efficacy and validity of the current selection procedures, especially in view of the increasing evidence, albeit circumstantial, that all is not well and that the current selection process, which has remained largely unchanged for many decades, may no longer be fit for purpose...

Keywords

Surgery simulation Resident education Surgical training Virtual simulators 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

Prof. Luca Morelli, Dr. Gregorio Di Franco, Dr. Andrea Moglia, and Prof. Alfred Cuschieri declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Gardner AK, Smink DS, Scott BG et al (2018) How much are we spending on resident selection? J Surg Educ.  https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JSURG.2018.10.001 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Mattar SG, Alseidi AA, Jones DB et al (2013) General surgery residency inadequately prepares trainees for fellowship. Ann Surg 258:440–449.  https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e3182a191ca CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Moglia A, Ferrari V, Morelli L et al (2014) Distribution of innate ability for surgery amongst medical students assessed by an advanced virtual reality surgical simulator. Surg Endosc 28:1830–1837.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-013-3393-6 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Moglia A, Morelli L, Ferrari V et al (2018) Distribution of innate psychomotor skills recognized as important for surgical specialization in unconditioned medical undergraduates. Surg Endosc 32:4087–4095.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-018-6146-8 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Buckley CE, Kavanagh DO, Gallagher TK et al (2013) Does aptitude influence the rate at which proficiency is achieved for laparoscopic appendectomy? J Am Coll Surg 217:1020–1027.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2013.07.405 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gallagher AG, Seymour NE, Jordan-Black J-A et al (2013) Prospective, randomized assessment of transfer of training (ToT) and transfer effectiveness ratio (TER) of virtual reality simulation training for laparoscopic skill acquisition. Ann Surg 257:1025–1031.  https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e318284f658 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.General Surgery Unit, Department of Oncology, Transplantation and New TechnologiesUniversity of PisaPisaItaly
  2. 2.EndoCAS (Center for Computer Assisted Surgery)University of PisaPisaItaly
  3. 3.Institute for Medical Science and TechnologyUniversity of DundeeDundeeUK

Personalised recommendations