Advertisement

Low-temperature synthesis of graphene derivatives: mechanism and characterization

  • Peetam Mandal
  • Mitali SahaEmail author
Original Paper
  • 7 Downloads

Abstract

In this paper, we have reported the synthesis of graphene oxide (GO) and reduced graphene oxide (rGO) from non-graphitic organic compounds in contrast to the earlier reported graphite powder. The development of graphitic planes was achieved via two alternate ways. In the first case, GO was prepared from two different compounds viz. organic acids and carbohydrates which were further reduced to rGO using thiourea in aqueous medium. Second, thiourea was added in situ which resulted in the direct conversion of dextrose to graphene, bypassing the formation of GO. The controlled heating played an important role to prepare GO without using additional oxidizing agents and to facilitate condensation and aromatization of non-graphitic precursors. The results suggested that any carbohydrate or organic acid containing hydroxyl groups and carbon atom (≥ 4) favored the development of graphitic planes via inter- and intramolecular linkages. The direct conversion of dextrose to graphene was confirmed by the peak at around 2θ of 25° indicating the formation of 002 plane due to stacking of layers of graphene. The HRTEM micrographs showed distinct lattice fringes with d-spacing of 3.25 Å.

Keywords

Graphene Carbohydrates Organic acids Chemistry Mechanism 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors like to thank the Central Research facility (CRF) of NIT, Agartala for the powder X-ray diffractogram pattern, Indian Institute of Science Education and Research (IISER) Kolkata for HRTEM micrographs and Indian Association of Cultivation of Science for Raman spectra.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Bai HY, Chen C, Wu H, Da Z, Fan W (2016) Fabrication of ferric oxide/reduced graphene oxide/cadmium sulfide heterostructure photoelectrode for enhanced photoelectrochemical performance. Cryst Res Technol 51:656–662.  https://doi.org/10.1002/crat.201600228 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bi H, Wan S, Cao X, Wu X, Zhou Y, Yin K, Su S, Ma Q, Sindoro M, Zhu J, Zhang Z (2019) A general and facile method for preparation of large-scale reduced graphene oxide films with controlled structures. Carbon 143:162–171.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2018.11.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Boutchich M, Jaffré A, Alamarguy D, Alvarez J, Barras A, Tanizawa Y, Tero R, Okada H, Thu TV, Kleider JP, Sandhu A (2013) Characterization of graphene oxide reduced through chemical and biological processes. J Phy Conf Ser 433:012001.  https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/433/1/012001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Celebi AT, Barisik M, Beskok A (2018) Surface charge-dependent transport of water in graphene nano-channels. Microfluid Nanofluidics 22:7.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10404-017-2027-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chyan Y, Ye R, Li Y, Singh SP, Arnusch CJ, Tour JM (2018) Laser-induced graphene by multiple lasing: toward electronics on cloth, paper, and food. ACS Nano 12:2176–2183.  https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.7b08539 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dimiev AM, Tour JM (2014) Mechanism of graphene oxide formation. ACS Nano 8:3060–3068.  https://doi.org/10.1021/nn500606a CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dong Y, Shao J, Chen C, Li H, Wang R, Chi Y, Lin X, Chen G (2012) Blue luminescent graphene quantum dots and graphene oxide prepared by tuning the carbonization degree of citric acid. Carbon 50:4738–4743.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2012.06.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Eigler S, Dotzer C, Hirsch A (2012) Visualization of defect densities in reduced graphene oxide. Carbon 50:3666–3673.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2012.03.039 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Filip J, Kasák P, Tkac J (2015) Graphene as signal amplifier for preparation of ultrasensitive electrochemical biosensors. Chem Pap 69:112–133.  https://doi.org/10.1515/chempap-2015-0051 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fried JP, Swett JL, Bian X, Mol JA (2018) Challenges in fabricating graphene nanodevices for electronic DNA sequencing. MRS Commun 8:703–711.  https://doi.org/10.1557/mrc.2018.187 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gabal MA, Zeid KA, El-Gendy AA, El-Shall MS (2019) One-step novel synthesis of CoFe2O4/graphene composites for organic dye removal. J Sol-Gel Sci Technol 89:743–753.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10971-019-04917-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hadi M, Mollaei T (2019) Reduced graphene oxide/graphene oxide hybrid-modified electrode for electrochemical sensing of tobramycin. Chem Pap 73:291–299.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11696-018-0578-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Han X, Ye R, Chyan Y, Wang T, Zhang C, Shi L, Zhang T, Zhao Y, Tour JM (2018) Laser-induced graphene from wood impregnated with metal salts and use in electrocatalysis. ACS Appl Nano Mater 1:5053–5061.  https://doi.org/10.1021/acsanm.8b01163 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Huang H, Wang X (2012) Pd nanoparticles supported on low-defect graphene sheets: for use as high-performance electrocatalysts for formic acid and methanol oxidation. J Mater Chem 22:22533–22541.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C2JM33727D CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hummers WS Jr, Offeman RE (1958) Preparation of graphitic oxide. J Am Chem Soc 80:1339.  https://doi.org/10.1021/ja01539a017 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Jiang T, Bu F, Feng X, Shakir I, Hao G, Xu Y (2017) Porous Fe2O3 nanoframeworks encapsulated within three-dimensional graphene as high-performance flexible anode for lithium-ion battery. ACS Nano 11:5140–5147.  https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.7b02198 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lin J, Peng Z, Liu Y, Ruiz-Zepeda F, Ye R, Samuel EL, Yacaman MJ, Yakobson BI, Tour JM (2014) Laser-induced porous graphene films from commercial polymers. Nat Commun 5:5714.  https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms6714 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Liu Z, Nørgaard K, Overgaard MH, Ceccato M, Mackenzie DM, Stenger N, Stipp SL, Hassenkam T (2018) Direct observation of oxygen configuration on individual graphene oxide sheets. Carbon 127:141–148.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2017.10.100 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ma Y, Zhao D, Chen Y, Huang J, Zhang Z, Zhang X, Zhang B (2019) A novel core-shell polyaniline/graphene oxide/copper nanocomposite for high performance and low-cost supercapacitors. Chem Pap 73:119–129.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11696-018-0556-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Mandal P, Naik MJ, Saha M (2018) Room temperature synthesis of graphene nanosheets. Cryst Res Technol 53:1700250.  https://doi.org/10.1002/crat.201700250 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Mathialagan S, Ponnaiah GP, Vijay M (2017) Synthesis and characterization of GO-ZnO nanocomposite material exhibiting photo catalytic degradation of dye waste water. J Sci Ind Res 76:44–49Google Scholar
  22. Munuera JM, Paredes JI, Enterria M, Pagán A, Villar-Rodil S, Pereira MF, Martins JI, Figueiredo JL, Cenis JL, Martínez-Alonso A, Tascon JM (2017) Electrochemical exfoliation of graphite in aqueous sodium halide electrolytes toward low oxygen content graphene for energy and environmental applications. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 9:24085–24099.  https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.7b04802 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Pei S, Wei Q, Huang K, Cheng HM, Ren W (2018) Green synthesis of graphene oxide by seconds timescale water electrolytic oxidation. Nat Commun 9:145.  https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-017-02479-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Penki TR, Valurouthu G, Shivakumara S, Sethuraman VA, Munichandraiah N (2018) In situ synthesis of bismuth (Bi)/reduced graphene oxide (RGO) nanocomposites as high-capacity anode materials for a Mg-ion battery. New J Chem 42:5996–6004.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C7NJ04930G CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Reddy R, Palla P, Kumar V (2018) A triple band flexible antenna using multi-layer graphene patch and polymer substrate. J Sci Ind Res 77:394–398Google Scholar
  26. Sen B, Kuzu S, Demir E, Akocak S, Sen F (2017a) Monodisperse palladium–nickel alloy nanoparticles assembled on graphene oxide with the high catalytic activity and reusability in the dehydrogenation of dimethylamine–borane. Int J Hydrog Energy 42:23276–23283.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.05.113 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Sen B, Kuzu S, Demir E, Akocak S, Sen F (2017b) Polymer-graphene hybride decorated Pt nanoparticles as highly efficient and reusable catalyst for the dehydrogenation of dimethylamine–borane at room temperature. Int J Hydrog Energy 42:23284–23291.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.05.112 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Sen B, Kuzu S, Demir E, Okyay TO, Sen F (2017c) Hydrogen liberation from the dehydrocoupling of dimethylamine–borane at room temperature by using novel and highly monodispersed RuPtNi nanocatalysts decorated with graphene oxide. Int J Hydrog Energy 42:23299–23306.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.04.213 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Ye R, Chyan Y, Zhang J, Li Y, Han X, Kittrell C, Tour JM (2017) Laser-induced graphene formation on wood. Adv Mater 29:1702211.  https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201702211 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Ye R, Han X, Kosynkin DV, Li Y, Zhang C, Jiang B, Martí AA, Tour JM (2018) Laser-induced conversion of teflon into fluorinated nanodiamonds or fluorinated graphene. ACS Nano 12:1083–1088.  https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.7b05877 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Yıldız Y, Kuzu S, Sen B, Savk A, Akocak S, Şen F (2017) Different ligand based monodispersed Pt nanoparticles decorated with rGO as highly active and reusable catalysts for the methanol oxidation. Int J Hydrog Energy 42:13061–13069.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.03.230 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Institute of Chemistry, Slovak Academy of Sciences 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of ChemistryNational Institute of Technology AgartalaAgartalaIndia

Personalised recommendations