Advertisement

Application of acid-promoted UiO-66-NH2 MOFs in the treatment of wastewater containing methylene blue

  • Yunxia Fang
  • Liuxue ZhangEmail author
  • Qianqian Zhao
  • Xiulian Wang
  • Xu Jia
Original Paper
  • 10 Downloads

Abstract

A series of Zr-based MOFs were successfully prepared by conventional solvothermal method and microwave irradiation method. The effects of synthesis methods and acid modifiers on the morphology and thermal stability of the materials were investigated. The samples were characterized by powder X-ray diffraction, scanning electron microscopy, thermogravimetric analysis, N2 adsorption–desorption, Fourier transform infrared, and diffuse reflectance spectra. The results showed that the products synthesized by microwave irradiation possessed a better dispersibility and a lager specific surface area than those synthesized by solvothermal method. As a potential adsorbent for wastewater treatment, the adsorption and removal of cationic dye methylene blue (MB) by the synthetic materials was studied. The addition of acid as a regulator could increase the specific surface area of the materials, thereby improving the adsorption efficiency of MB. After repeated adsorption and desorption, the adsorption capacity of the samples could be regenerated by photocatalytic degradation. The photodegradation and regeneration experiments showed that the samples had good stability and reusability. All these indicated that this type of materials had great potential in the field of wastewater treatment and resource utilization.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

Synthesis method Acid regulator Adsorption Resource utilization Regeneration and reusability 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This project was granted financial support from the Henan Province program for science and technology development (16210221247) and the Program of Henan Province Department of Education (15A430053).

Supplementary material

11696_2019_692_MOESM1_ESM.docx (432 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 432 kb)

References

  1. Aguilera-Sigalat J, Fox-Charles A, Bradshaw D (2014) Direct photo-hydroxylation of the Zr-based framework UiO-66. Chem Commun 50:15453–15456.  https://doi.org/10.1039/c4cc07882a CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Atzori C, Shearer GC, Maschio L, Civalleri B, Bonino F, Lamberti C, Svelle S, Lillerud KP, Bordiga S (2017) Effect of benzoic acid as a modulator in the structure of UiO-66: an experimental and computational study. J Phys Chem C 121:9312–9324.  https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.7b00483 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chen C, Ma W, Zhao J (2010) Semiconductor-mediated photodegradation of pollutants under visible-light irradiation. Chem Soc Rev 39:4206–4219.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.08.108 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chen Q, He Q, Lv M, Yanli X, Yang H, Liu X, Wei F (2015) Selective adsorption of cationic dyes by UiO-66-NH2. Appl Surf Sci 327:77–85.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2014.11.103 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Garibaya SJ, Cohen SM (2010) Isoreticular synthesis and modification of frameworks with the UiO-66 topology. Chem Commun 46:7700–7702.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C0CC02990D CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Guan Q, Wang B, Chai X, Liu J, Junjie G, Ning P (2017) Comparison of Pd-UiO-66 and Pd-UiO-66-NH2 catalysts performance for phenol hydrogenation in aqueous medium. Fuel 205:130–141.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2017.05.029 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Han Y, Liu M, Li K, Zuo Y, Wei Y, Shutao X, Zhang G, Song C, Zhang Z, Guo X (2015) Facile synthesis of morphology and size controlled zirconium metal–organic framework UiO-66: the role of hydrofluoric acid in crystallization. CrystEngComm 17:6434–6440.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C5CE00729A CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Horcajada P, Gref R, Baati T, Allan PK, Maurin G, Couvreur P, Férey G, Morris RE, Serre C (2011) Metal–organic frameworks in biomedicine. Chem Rev 112:1232–1268.  https://doi.org/10.1021/cr200256v CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Huang A, Wan L, Caro J (2018) Microwave-assisted synthesis of well-shaped UiO-66-NH2 with high CO2 adsorption capacity. Mater Res Bull 98:308–313.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.materresbull.2017.10.038 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Jabbari V, Veleta JM, Zarei-Chaleshtori M, Gardea-Torresdey J, Villagrán D (2016) Green synthesis of magnetic MOF@GO and MOF@CNT hybrid nanocomposites with high adsorption capacity towards organic pollutants. Chem Eng J 304:774–783.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2016.06.034 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Jia M, Feng Y, Liu S, Qiu J, Yao J (2017) Graphene oxide gas separation membranes intercalated by UiO-66-NH2 with enhanced hydrogen separation performance. J Membr Sci 539:172–177.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2017.06.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Katz MJ, Brown ZJ, Colon YJ, Siu PW, Scheidt KA, Snurr RQ, Hupp JT, Farha OK (2013) A facile synthesis of UiO-66, UiO-67 and their derivatives. Chem Commun 49:9449–9451.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C3CC46105J CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Li Y, Liu Y, Gao W, Zhang L, Liu W, Jingjing L, Wang Z, Deng Y-J (2014) Microwave-assisted synthesis of UIO-66 and its adsorption performance towards dyes. CrystEngComm 16:7037–7042.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C4CE00526K CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Li B, Wen H, Cui Y, Zhou W, Qian G, Chen B (2016) Emerging multifunctional metal–organic framework materials. Adv Mater 28:8819–8860.  https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201601133 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Li Y, Zhang X, Zhang L, Jiang K, Yuanjing Cui Yu, Yang GQ (2017) A nanoscale Zr-based fluorescent metal–organic framework for selective and sensitive detection of hydrogen sulfide. J Solid State Chem 255:97–101.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jssc.2017.07.027 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Liang Q, Zhang M, Zhang Z, Liu C, Xu S, Li Z (2017) Zinc phthalocyanine coupled with UIO-66 (NH2) via a facile condensation process for enhanced visible-light-driven photocatalysis. J Alloys Compd 690:123–130.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2016.08.087 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lin J, Lai H, Lin KA (2018) Rapid microwave-hydrothermal conversion of lignin model compounds to value-added products via catalytic oxidation using metal organic frameworks. Chem Pap 72:2315–2325.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11696-018-0452-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Molavi H, Eskandari A, Shojaei A, Mousavi SA (2018) Enhancing CO2/N2 adsorption selectivity via post-synthetic modification of NH2-UiO-66(Zr). Microporous Mesoporous Mater 257:193–201.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micromeso.2017.08.043 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Polyzoidis A, Schwarzer M, Loebbecke S, Piscopo CG (2017) Continuous synthesis of UiO-66 in microreactor: pursuing the optimum between intensified production and structural properties. Mater Lett 197:213–216.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2017.02.091 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Pu S, Xu L, Sun L, Du H (2015) Tuning the optical properties of the zirconium–UiO-66 metal–organic framework for photocatalytic degradation of methyl orange. Inorg Chem Commun 52:50–52.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inoche.2014.12.015 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Schaate A, Roy P, Godt A, Lippke J, Waltz F, Wiebcke M, Behrens P (2011) Modulated synthesis of Zr-based metal–organic frameworks: from nano to single crystals. Chem Eur J 17:6643–6651.  https://doi.org/10.1002/chem.201003211 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Sun D, Li Z (2016) Double-solvent method to Pd nanoclusters encapsulated inside the cavity of NH2-Uio-66(Zr) for efficient visible-light-promoted Suzuki coupling reaction. J Phys Chem C 120:19744–19750.  https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b06710 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Taddei M, Tiana D, Casati N, van Bokhoven JA, Smit B, Ranocchiari M (2017) Mixed-linker UiO-66: structure–property relationships revealed by a combination of high-resolution powder X-ray diffraction and density functional theory calculations. Phys Chem Chem Phys 19:1551–1559.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C6CP07801J CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Vakili R, Xu S, Al-Janabi N, Gorgojo P, Holmes SM, Fan X (2018) Microwave-assisted synthesis of zirconium-based metal organic frameworks (MOFs): optimization and gas adsorption. Microporous Mesoporous Mater 260:45–53.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micromeso.2017 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Wang X, Zhao X, Zhang D, Li G, Li H (2018) Microwave irradiation induced UIO-66-NH2 anchored on graphene with high activity for photocatalytic reduction of CO2. Appl Catal B Environ 228:47–53.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2018.01.066 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Yang Q, Qiang X, Shuhong Yu, Jiang H (2016) Pd Nanocubes@ZIF-8: integration of plasmon-driven photothermal conversion with a metal–organic framework for efficient and selective catalysis. Angew Chem Int Ed 55:3685–3689.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ange.201510655 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Zeng L, Xiao L, Long Y, Shi X (2018) Trichloroacetic acid-modulated synthesis of polyoxometalate@UiO-66 for selective adsorption of cationic dyes. J Colloid Interface Sci 516:274–283.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2018.01.070 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Zhou L, Zhang X, Chen Y (2017) Modulated synthesis of zirconium metal–organic framework UiO-66 with enhanced dichloromethane adsorption capacity. Mater Lett 197:167–170.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2017.03.162 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Institute of Chemistry, Slovak Academy of Sciences 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yunxia Fang
    • 1
  • Liuxue Zhang
    • 1
    Email author
  • Qianqian Zhao
    • 1
  • Xiulian Wang
    • 2
  • Xu Jia
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Materials and Chemical EngineeringZhongyuan University of TechnologyZhengzhouPeople’s Republic of China
  2. 2.School of Energy and EnviromentZhongyuan University of TechnologyZhengzhouPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations