Advertisement

Chemical Papers

, Volume 73, Issue 4, pp 937–942 | Cite as

Fabrication of efficient and cost effective multi-podal TiO2 nanotube array photo-anode on replacing conventional platinum counter electrode by graphite foil

  • Muzaffar Ahmad BodaEmail author
Original Paper
  • 33 Downloads

Abstract

Cost effective graphite foil (GF) were used as counter electrode (CE) to fabricate multi-podal TiO2 nasnotube array (MTNA) via electrochemical anodization route. Moreover, the MTNA fabricated while using GF as CE were greater in length than that obtained while using PF as CE. Correspondingly, the changed dimensional parameters in such anodized MTNA prepared photo-anode resulted appreciable enhancement in photocurrent density from 18 to 21.8 mA/cm2 under 1 sun illumination (100 mW/cm2). The use of platinum foil as counter electrode shows feeble degree of deterioration despite its appreciable nature of inertness. The corresponding amount of platinum lost by the CE is being added to the electrolyte which in turn contaminates the MTNA in the working electrode. As such nanotubes with purposeful composition are not being produced on using platinum foil as CE. Replacing platinum foil with graphite one, the purposeful composition in nanotubes is possible despite GF shows deterioration as well, as graphite (carbon) gets evaporated on annealing at 500 °C to obtain a desired anatase phase which is not possible in case of platinum contamination.

Keywords

Electrochemical Graphite foil Counter electrode Multi-podal Anatase Photocurrent density 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Authors are grateful to ENL and MSRC research group, IIT Madras for providing the necessary facilities to carry out the experimental work.

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no any conflict of interest.

References

  1. Boda MA, Shah MA (2017a) Fabrication mechanism of compact TiO2 nanotubes and their photo-electrochemical ability. Mater Res Express 4:075908.  https://doi.org/10.1088/2053-1591/aa7cd2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Boda MA, Shah MA (2017b) Augmented photoelectrochemical efficiency of ZnO/TiO2 nanotube heterostructures. J Electron Mater 46:6698–6703.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11664-017-5710-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Boda MA, Shah MA (2018) Fabrication of ZnFe2O4/TiO2 nanotube array composite to harness the augmented photocurrent density under visible light. Appl Phys A 124:55.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00339-017-1485-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chen B, Lu K (2012) Hierarchically branched titania nanotubes with tailored diameters and branch numbers. Langmuir 28:2937–2943.  https://doi.org/10.1021/nn1026214 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cho IS, Chen Z, Forman AJ, Kim DR, Rao PM, Jaramillo TF, Zheng X (2011) Branched TiO2 nanorods for photoelectrochemical hydrogen production. Nano Lett 11:4978–4984.  https://doi.org/10.1021/nl2029392 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Luttrell T, Halpegamage S, Tao J, Kramer A, Sutter E, Batzill M (2014) Why is anatase a better photocatalyst than rutile?-Model studies on epitaxial TiO2 films. Sci Rep 4:4043.  https://doi.org/10.1038/srep04043 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. McCreery RL (2008) Advanced carbon electrode materials for molecular electrochemistry. Chem Rev 108:2646–2687.  https://doi.org/10.1021/cr068076m CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Mohammadpour A, Waghmare PR, Mitra SK, Shankar K (2010) Anodic growth of large-diameter multi-podal TiO2 nanotubes. ACS Nano 4:7421–7430.  https://doi.org/10.1021/nn1026214 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Mohapatra SK, Misra M, Mahajan VK, Raja KS (2008) Synthesis of Y-branched TiO2 nanotubes. Mater Lett 62:1772–1774.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2007.09.083 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ota KI, Nishigori S, Kamiya N (1988) Dissolution of platinum anodes in sulfuric acid solution. J Electroanal Chem Interfacial Electrochem 23:205–215.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0728(88)87042-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Poulomi Roy, Berger Steffen, Schmuki Patrik (2011) TiO2 nanotubes: synthesis and applications. Angew Chem Int Ed 50(13):2904–2939.  https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201001374 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Rambabu Y, Jaiswal M, Roy SC (2015) Enhanced photoelectrochemical performance of multi-leg TiO2 nanotubes through efficient light harvesting. J Phys D Appl Phys 48:295302.  https://doi.org/10.1088/0022-3727/48/29/295302 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Rambabu Y, Jaiswal M, Roy SC (2016a) Probing the charge recombination in rGO decorated mixed phase (anatase-rutile) TiO2 multi-leg nanotubes. AIP Adv 6:115010.  https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4967387 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Rambabu Y, Jaiswal M, Roy SC (2016b) Effect of annealing temperature on the phase transition, structural stability and photo-electrochemical performance of TiO2 multi-leg nanotubes. Catal Today 278:255–261.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cattod.2016.01.016 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Rani S, Roy SC, Paulose M, Varghese OK, Mor GK, Kim S, Yoriya S, Latempa TJ, Grimes CA (2010) Synthesis and applications of electrochemically self-assembled titania nanotube arrays. Phys Chem Chem Phys 12:2780–2800.  https://doi.org/10.1039/B924125F CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Shao-Horn Y, Sheng WC, Chen S, Ferreira PJ, Holby EF, Morgan D (2007) Instability of supported platinum nanoparticles in low-temperature fuel cells. Top Catal 46:285–305.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11244-007-9000-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Tamilselvan A, Balakumar S (2015) Dimension and morphology controlled fabrication of TiO2 nanotubes by electrochemical anodization method. AIP Conf Proc 1665:1.  https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4917694 Google Scholar
  18. Tang H, Prasad K, Sanjines R, Schmid PE, Levy F (1994) Electrical and optical properties of TiO2 anatase thin films. J Appl Phys 75:2042–2047.  https://doi.org/10.1063/1.356306 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Tian M, Cousins C, Beauchemin D, Furuya Y, Ohma A, Jerkiewicz G (2016) Influence of the working and counter electrode surface area ratios on the dissolution of platinum under electrochemical conditions. ACS Catal. 6:5108–5116.  https://doi.org/10.1021/acscatal.6b00200 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Topalov AA, Katsounaros I, Auinger M, Cherevko S, Meier JC, Klemm SO, Mayrhofer KJ (2012) Dissolution of platinum: limits for the deployment of electrochemical energy conversion? Angew Chem Int Ed 51:12613–12615.  https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201207256 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Wei R, Fang M, Dong G, Ho JC (2017) Is platinum a suitable counter electrode material for electrochemical hydrogen evolution reaction? Sci Bull 62:971–973.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scib.2017.06.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Zhao Y, Hoivik N, Wang K (2016) Recent advance on engineering titanium dioxide nanotubes for photochemical and photoelectrochemical water splitting. Nano Energy 30:728–744.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nanoen.2016.09.027 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Zhu K, Neale NR, Miedaner A, Frank AJ (2007) Enhanced charge-collection efficiencies and light scattering in dye-sensitized solar cells using oriented TiO2 nanotubes arrays. Nano Lett 7:69–74.  https://doi.org/10.1021/nl062000o CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Institute of Chemistry, Slovak Academy of Sciences 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PhysicsNational Institute of Technology SrinagarJammu and KashmirIndia

Personalised recommendations