Advertisement

Chemical Papers

, Volume 73, Issue 2, pp 387–395 | Cite as

A novel method to produce few layers of graphene as support materials for platinum catalyst

  • Oguz Kaan OzdemirEmail author
Original Paper
  • 48 Downloads

Abstract

There are two main obstacles preventing the commercialization of polymer electrolyte fuel cells (PEMFCs) such as low durability of support material and high cost of metal catalyst. It is necessary to use support materials to increase the distribution of the catalysts and to be accumulated more in the active area. Despite widespread usage of carbon as support material, carbon suffers from oxidation under fuel cell working conditions. In the past several years, researchers have given many efforts to develop new support materials, which have high surface area, and are electrically conducting and chemically stable. Among all support materials, graphene, thanks to two-dimensional graphite form, has unique physical and electrical properties; because of these superior features, graphene can be an ideal support material for nanoparticles. In this study, we updated the Hummers’ method by addition of certain amount of potassium dichromate in addition to potassium permanganate as oxidant agent. After that, graphene oxide was uniformly coated with conductive polyaniline (PANI) polymers by the liquid–liquid interface polymerization method. Finally, PANI/GO composite was pyrolyzed at certain temperature and time to reduce graphene oxide to few layers of graphene. Electrochemical active surface area (EASA) of commercially obtained Pt/VulcanXC-72 was calculated as 29.5 m2/gPt, while EASA of Pt/RGO catalysts was 63.7 m2/gPt.

Keywords

Graphene oxide Polyaniline Reduced graphene oxide Electrocatalyst PEM fuel cell 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We gratefully acknowledge financial support from TUBITAK (The Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey-Project Numbers 113M551 and 115M396).

References

  1. Aydin M, Hasimoglu A, Bayrak Y, Ozdemir OK (2015) Kinetic properties of co-reduced Co-B/graphene catalyst powder for hydrogen generation of sodium borohydride. J Renew Sustain Energy 7(1):013117.  https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4906914 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Devrim Y, Albostan A (2016) Graphene-supported platinum catalyst-based membrane electrode assembly for PEM fuel cell. J Electron Mater 45(8):3900–3907.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11664-016-4703-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Du L, Shao Y, Sun J, Yin G, Liu J, Wang Y (2016) Advanced catalyst supports for PEM fuel cell cathodes. Nano Energy 29:314–322.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nanoen.2016.03.016 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Gasteiger HA, Kocha SS, Sompalli B, Wagner FT (2005) Activity benchmarks and requirements for Pt, Pt-alloy, and non-Pt oxygen reduction catalysts for PEMFCs. Appl Catal B 56(1–2):9–35.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2004.06.021 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ji H, Li M, Wang Y, Gao F (2012) Electrodeposition of graphene-supported PdPt nanoparticles with enhanced electrocatalytic activity. Electrochem Commun 24:17–20.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elecom.2012.07.029 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Kaan Ozdemir O, Hasimoglu A, Sems Ahsen A (2013) Synthesis of graphene-based Co-B catalyst via simultaneous chemical reduction for hydrolysis of sodium borohydride. J Renew Sustain Energy 5(6):063135.  https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4854658 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Kavan L, Yum JH, Grätzel M (2011) Graphene nanoplatelets outperforming platinum as the electrocatalyst in co-bipyridine-mediated dye-sensitized solar cells. Nano Lett 11(12):5501–5506.  https://doi.org/10.1021/nl203329c CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Kuilla T, Bhadra S, Yao D, Kim NH, Bose S, Lee JH (2010) Recent advances in graphene based polymer composites. Prog Polym Sci 35(11):1350–1375.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2010.07.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Lee K, Zhang J, Wang H, Wilkinson DP (2006) Progress in the synthesis of carbon nanotube-and nanofiber-supported Pt electrocatalysts for PEM fuel cell catalysis. J Appl Electrochem 36(5):507–522.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10800-006-9120-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Li ZF, Zhang H, Liu Q, Liu Y, Stanciu L, Xie J (2014) Covalently-grafted polyaniline on graphene oxide sheets for high performance electrochemical supercapacitors. Carbon 71:257–267.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2014.01.037 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Pei S, Cheng HM (2012) The reduction of graphene oxide. Carbon 50(9):3210–3228.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2011.11.010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Şayin ES, Bayrakçeken A, Eroğlu İ (2012) Durability of PEM fuel cell electrocatalysts prepared by microwave irradiation technique. Int J Hydrogen Energy 37(21):16663–16672.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2012.02.170 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Sebastián D, Calderón JC, González-Expósito JA, Pastor E, Martínez-Huerta MV, Suelves I, Lázaro MJ et al (2010) Influence of carbon nanofiber properties as electrocatalyst support on the electrochemical performance for PEM fuel cells. Int J Hydrogen Energy 35(18):9934–9942.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2009.12.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Shao Y, Zhang S, Kou R, Wang X, Wang C, Dai S, Lin Y et al (2010) Noncovalently functionalized graphitic mesoporous carbon as a stable support of Pt nanoparticles for oxygen reduction. J Power Sources 195(7):1805–1811.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2009.10.036 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Wu H, Wexler D, Liu H (2011) Durability investigation of graphene-supported Pt nanocatalysts for PEM fuel cells. J Solid State Electrochem 15(5):1057–1062.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10008-011-1317-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Zhang M, Xie J, Sun Q, Yan Z, Chen M, Jing J (2013a) Enhanced electrocatalytic activity of high Pt-loadings on surface functionalized graphene nanosheets for methanol oxidation. Int J Hydrogen Energy 38(36):16402–16409.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2013.09.108 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Zhang Y, Liu C, Min Y, Qi X, Ben X (2013b) The simple preparation of graphene/Pt nanoparticles composites and their electrochemical performance. J Mater Sci Mater Electron 24(9):3244–3248.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10854-013-1235-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Institute of Chemistry, Slovak Academy of Sciences 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Metallurgical and Material EngineeringYildiz Tech. UniversityIstanbulTurkey

Personalised recommendations