Advertisement

Chemical Papers

, Volume 73, Issue 1, pp 71–84 | Cite as

Medicinal chemistry: an effect of a desolvation penalty of an amide group in the development of kinase inhibitors

  • Juraj DobiašEmail author
  • Marek Ondruš
  • Matúš Hlaváč
  • Miroslav Murár
  • Juraj Kóňa
  • Gabriela Addová
  • Andrej Boháč
Original Paper
  • 55 Downloads

Abstract

An analysis of VEGFR-2 conformers from the PDB allowed us to identify an unused salt bridge containing pocket (SBCP) suitably positioned over an AAZ ligand (PDB: 1Y6A). The SBCP consists of Lys866, Glu883 and Phe1045. The closest distance (4.5 Å) between AAZ and the centre of the SBCP has para-carbon from the AAZ internal phenyl ring. This is a bit longer as required for a simple substitution on AAZ to interact with SBCP. To investigate ligand–SBCP interaction, we extended the structure of AAZ by an insertion of an amide group between an oxazole and its aromatic substituent. This allowed moving the internal Ph ring of the carboxamide ligand closer to the SBCP. Promising predictions (poses and scores) were determined for such novel ligands by the Glide (Schrödinger) and the Dock (UCSF) software. Fifteen novel carboxamides 4(a–j,l–p) were prepared and screened. Surprisingly, their enzymatic activities are much lower (IC50: 7.6–437 μM) as expected than the AAZ ligand (22 nM). To explain this discrepancy, we hypothesized that high solvation energy could be a main reason for the penalty that ligands have to pay by their binding to the target. Therefore, 11 additional AAZ analogues possessing modified or replaced amide group by less solvated substituents 4(q–r); 5(a–e), 7(a–b), 9, 10 were developed. A correlation between IC50 activities and calculated solvation energies clearly supported our hypothesis. The ligands possessing less solvated group (instead of the –CONH–) were more powerful VEGFR2 TK inhibitors and vice versa. This conclusion was supported also by a significance of hydrophobic enclosure descriptor in the identified QSAR models. We can conclude that the insertion of a highly solvated extension fragment (e.g. the amide group) in the ligand should be carefully considered especially when this group will act in a hydrophobic part of a protein without forming additional interaction(s). Otherwise, the desolvation penalty of an inserted group could be a limiting factor for a ligand activity.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

VEGFR-2 TK SBCP pocket Tyrosine kinase inhibitors Amide group insertion Energy of solvation Desolvation penalty 2-(Arylamino)oxazole-5-carboxamide N,5-Diaryloxazol-2-amine QSAR 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by Biomagi, Ltd. (discovery of the SBCP pocket, an idea of an amide group insertion, Dock UCSF design of inhibitors), JD (a solvation hypothesis and calculations), VEGA 1/0670/18, VEGA 2/0064/15 (QSAR) and ITMS 26240220086 (HPLC MS). We are grateful to Mgr. Juraj Filo, PhD., for the measurement of NMR spectra.

Supplementary material

11696_2018_576_MOESM1_ESM.docx (20 mb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 20482 kb)

References

  1. Boyer SJ (2002) Small molecule inhibitors of KDR (VEGFR-2) kinase: an overview of structure activity relationships. Curr Top Med Chem 2:973–1000.  https://doi.org/10.2174/1568026023393273 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Dunetz JR, Xiang Y, Baldwin A, Ringling J (2011) General and scalable amide bond formation with epimerization-prone substrates using T3P and pyridine. Org Lett 13:5048–5051.  https://doi.org/10.1021/ol201875q CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ferrara N (2004) Vascular endothelial growth factor as a target for anticancer therapy. Oncologist 9(Suppl1):2–10. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15178810. Accessed 30 May 2017
  4. Finley SD, Popel AS (2012) Predicting the effects of anti-angiogenic agents targeting specific VEGF isoforms. AAPS J 14:500–509.  https://doi.org/10.1208/s12248-012-9363-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Friesner RA, Banks JL, Murphy RB, Halgren TA, Klicic JJ, Mainz DT, Repasky MP, Knoll EH, Shelley M, Perry JK, Shaw DE, Francis P, Shenkin PS (2004) Glide: a new approach for rapid, accurate docking and scoring. 1. Method and assessment of docking accuracy. J Med Chem 47:1739–1749.  https://doi.org/10.1021/jm0306430 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Friesner RA, Murphy RB, Repasky MP, Frye LL, Greenwood JR, Halgren TA, Sanschagrin PC, Mainz DT (2006) Extra precision glide: docking and scoring incorporating a model of hydrophobic enclosure for protein-ligand complexes. J Med Chem 49:6177–6196.  https://doi.org/10.1021/jm051256o CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Glide, version 7.0, (2016)Google Scholar
  8. Gross S, Rahal R, Stransky N, Lengauer C, Hoeflich KP (2015) Targeting cancer with kinase inhibitors. J Clin Invest 125:1780–1789.  https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI76094 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Harris PA, Cheung M, Hunter RN, Brown ML, Veal JM, Nolte RT, Wang L, Liu W, Crosby RM, Johnson JH, Epperly AH, Kumar R, Luttrell DK, Stafford JA (2005) Discovery and evaluation of 2-anilino-5-aryloxazoles as a novel class of VEGFR2 kinase inhibitors. J Med Chem 48:1610–1619.  https://doi.org/10.1021/jm049538w CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Irwin JJ, Shoichet BK, Mysinger MM, Huang N, Colizzi F, Wassam P, Cao Y (2009) Automated docking screens: a feasibility study. J Med Chem 52:5712–5720.  https://doi.org/10.1021/jm9006966 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Lintnerová L, García-Caballero M, Gregáň F, Melicherčík M, Quesada AR, Dobiaš J, Lác J, Sališová M, Boháč A (2014) A development of chimeric VEGFR2 TK inhibitor based on two ligand conformers from PDB: 1Y6A complex—Medicinal chemistry consequences of a TKs analysis. Eur J Med Chem 72:146–159.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmech.2013.11.023 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Lintnerová L, Kováčiková L, Hanquet G, Boháč A (2015) Selected methodologies convenient for the synthesis of N,5-diaryloxazole-2-amine pharmacophore. J Heterocycl Chem 52:425–439.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jhet.2063 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Makhatadze GI, Privalov PL (1993) Contribution of hydration to protein folding thermodynamics. I. The enthalpy of hydration. J Mol Biol 232:639–659.  https://doi.org/10.1006/jmbi.1993.1416 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Mamos P, Papaioannou D, Kavounis C, Nastopoulos V (1997) (S)-3-(Oγ-methyl-Nα-triphenylmethylglutamyl)benzotriazole 1-oxide. Acta Crystallogr Sect C Cryst Struct Commun 53:1973–1975.  https://doi.org/10.1107/S0108270197011591 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Murár M, Dobiaš J, Šramel P, Addová G, Hanquet G, Boháč A (2017) Novel CLK1 inhibitors based on N-aryloxazol-2-amine skeleton—a possible way to dual VEGFR2 TK/CLK ligands. Eur J Med Chem 126:754–761.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmech.2016.11.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. ProQuinase GmbH. https://www.proqinase.com/. Accessed 8 Mar 2018
  17. Reaction Biology Corp. www.reactionbiology.com. Accessed 8 Mar 2018
  18. Risau W (1997) Mechanisms of angiogenesis. Nature 386:671–674.  https://doi.org/10.1038/386671a0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Shivakumar D, Williams J, Wu Y, Damm W, Shelley J, Sherman W (2010) Prediction of absolute solvation free energies using molecular dynamics free energy perturbation and the opls force field. J Chem Theory Comput 6:1509–1519.  https://doi.org/10.1021/ct900587b CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Sun Y, Jiang H, Wu W, Zeng W, Wu X (2013) Copper-catalyzed synthesis of substituted benzothiazoles via condensation of 2-aminobenzenethiols with nitriles. Org Lett 15:1598–1601.  https://doi.org/10.1021/ol400379z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Tan H, Pan CX, Xu YL, Wang HS, Pan YM (2012) Synthesis of benzoxazoles by the copper triflate catalysed reaction of nitriles and o-aminophenols. J Chem Res 36:370–373.  https://doi.org/10.3184/174751912X13360692916944 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Waltenberger J, Claessonwelsh L, Siegbahn A, Shibuya M, Heldin C (1994) Different signal-transduction properties of Kdr and Flt1, 2 receptors for vascular endothelial growth-factor. J Biol Chem 269:26988–26995. http://www.jbc.org/content/269/43/26988.long. Accessed 8 Mar 2018
  23. Zhang J, Yang PL, Gray NS (2009) Targeting cancer with small molecule kinase inhibitors. Nat Rev Cancer 9:28–39.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nrc2559 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Institute of Chemistry, Slovak Academy of Sciences 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Organic Chemistry, Faculty of Natural SciencesComenius University in BratislavaBratislavaSlovakia
  2. 2.Institute of Chemistry, Center for GlycomicsSlovak Academy of SciencesBratislavaSlovakia
  3. 3.Institute of Chemistry, Faculty of Natural SciencesComenius University in BratislavaBratislavaSlovakia
  4. 4.Biomagi, Ltd.BratislavaSlovakia

Personalised recommendations