Advertisement

Obesity Surgery

, Volume 30, Issue 1, pp 206–213 | Cite as

Overall Treatment Satisfaction 5 Years After Bariatric Surgery

  • Pål André HeglandEmail author
  • Anny Aasprang
  • Ronette L. Kolotkin
  • Grethe S. Tell
  • John Roger Andersen
Original Contributions
  • 203 Downloads

Abstract

Introduction

Up to 30 % of patients undergoing bariatric surgery are dissatisfied with treatment outcomes in the long term. The aim of this study was to examine overall satisfaction with treatment 5 years after bariatric surgery and its association with body mass index (BMI) and health-related quality of life (HRQOL).

Methods

Patients were surveyed 5 years after bariatric surgery; 108 patients had duodenal switch (DS) and 153 patients had laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG). The main outcome was overall treatment satisfaction, assessed by a single question, and analyzed by multiple logistic regression. Estimates for continuous independent variables represent the odds ratios (OR) for a 2-standard deviation difference.

Results

Five years after surgery, 82.4 % of the patients were very satisfied or satisfied, whereas 17.6 % were unsure or dissatisfied. The following variables assessed at 5 years were associated with being dissatisfied/unsure: a higher BMI (OR = 6.1, 95 % CI = 2.7–14.0, p < 0.001), reduced obesity-specific HRQOL (OR = 3.0, 95 % CI = 1.1–7.8, p = 0.03), and reduced mental HRQOL (OR = 0.3, 95 % CI = 0.1–0.8, p = 0.02). We also found that a higher proportion of patients who underwent LSG, compared to DS, reported being dissatisfied/unsure (OR = 3.3, 95 % CI = 1.3–8.8, p = 0.01).

Conclusion

Reduced mental HRQOL and obesity-related HRQOL, as well as higher BMI, were associated with less satisfaction with overall treatment outcomes 5 years after bariatric surgery. Differences in overall treatment satisfaction by type of operation warrant further investigation.

Keywords

Overall treatment satisfaction Bariatric surgery Health-related quality of life Duodenal switch Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy 

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Chang S-H, Stoll CRT, Song J, et al. The effectiveness and risks of bariatric surgery: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis, 2003–2012. JAMA Surg. 2014;149(3):275–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Colquitt JL, Pickett K, Loveman E, et al. Surgery for weight loss in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;(8)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Jakobsen G, Småstuen M, Sandbu R, et al. Association of bariatric surgery vs medical obesity treatment with long-term medical complications and obesity-related comorbidities. JAMA. 2018;319(3):291–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Adams TD, Davidson LE, Litwin SE, et al. Weight and metabolic outcomes 12 years after gastric bypass. N Engl J Med. 2017;377(12):1143–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Raoof M, Näslund I, Rask E, et al. Health-related quality-of-life (HRQoL) on an average of 12 years after gastric bypass surgery. Obes Surg. 2015;25(7):1119–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kolotkin RL, Kim J, Davidson LE, et al. 12-year trajectory of health-related quality of life in gastric bypass patients vs. comparison groups. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2018;14(9):1359–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hachem A, Brennan L. Quality of life outcomes of bariatric surgery: a systematic review. Obes Surg. 2015;26(2):395–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Xesfingi S, Vozikis A. Patient satisfaction with the healthcare system: assessing the impact of socio-economic and healthcare provision factors. BMC Health Serv Res. 2016;16:94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ballantyne GH. Measuring outcomes following bariatric surgery: weight loss parameters, improvement in co-morbid conditions, change in quality of life and patient satisfaction. Obes Surg. 2003;13(6):954–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Revicki DA. Patient assessment of treatment satisfaction: methods and practical issues. Gut. 2004;53(4):iv40–iv4.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Aasprang A, Andersen JR, Våge V, et al. Ten-year changes in health-related quality of life after biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2016;12(8):1594–600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Arman GA, Himpens J, Dhaenens J, et al. Long-term (11+years) outcomes in weight, patient satisfaction, comorbidities, and gastroesophageal reflux treatment after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2016;12(10):1778–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Marceau P, Biron S, Hould F-S, et al. Duodenal switch: long-term results. Obes Surg. 2007;17(11):1421–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Burton PR, Ooi GJ, Laurie C, et al. Changes in outcomes, satiety and adverse upper gastrointestinal symptoms following laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding. Obes Surg. 2017;27(5):1240–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Shai I, Henkin Y, Weitzman S, et al. Determinants of long-term satisfaction after vertical banded gastroplasty. Obes Surg. 2003;13(2):269–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Sannen I, Himpens J, Leman G. Causes of dissatisfaction in some patients after adjustable gastric banding. Obes Surg. 2001;11(5):605–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Robertsson O, Dunbar M, Pehrsson T, et al. Patient satisfaction after knee arthroplasty: a report on 27,372 knees operated on between 1981 and 1995 in Sweden. Acta Orthop Scand. 2000;71(3):262–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Loge JH, Kaasa S, Hjermstad MJ, et al. Translation and performance of the Norwegian SF-36 health survey in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. I. Data quality, scaling assumptions, reliability, and construct validity. J Clin Epidemiol. 1998;51(11):1069–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Aasprang A, Andersen JR, Våge V, et al. Psychosocial functioning before and after surgical treatment for morbid obesity: reliability and validation of the Norwegian version of obesity-related problem scale. PeerJ. 2015;3:e1275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    IBM Corp. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 24.0. Armonk: IBM Corp; 2016.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Farivar SS, Cunningham WE, Hays RD. Correlated physical and mental health summary scores for the SF-36 and SF-12 Health Survey, V.I. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2007;5:54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    da Cruz MRR, Branco-Filho AJ, Zaparolli MR, et al. Predictors of success in bariatric surgery: the role of BMI and pre-operative comorbidities. Obes Surg. 2018;28(5):1335–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Varban OA, Cassidy RB, Bonham A, et al. Factors associated with achieving a body mass index of less than 30 after bariatric surgery. JAMA Surg. 2017;152(11):1058–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Turrentine FE, Mehaffey JH, Mehaffey RL, et al. Patient reported outcomes 10 years after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Obes Surg. 2017;27(9):2253–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Angrisani L, Santonicola A, Iovino P, et al. IFSO Worldwide Survey 2016: primary, endoluminal, and revisional procedures. Obes Surg. 2018;28(12):3783–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Graham B, Green A, James M, et al. Measuring patient satisfaction in orthopaedic surgery. JBJS. 2015;97(1):80–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    De Vet H, Terwee C, Mokkink L, et al. Development of a measurement instrument. Measurement in medicine: a practical guide. Practical guides to biostatistics and epidemiology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2011. p. 30–64.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Rosenzveig A, Kuspinar A, Daskalopoulou SS, et al. Toward patient-centered care: a systematic review of how to ask questions that matter to patients. Medicine. 2014;93(22):e120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Brethauer SA, Kim J, El Chaar M, et al. Standardized outcomes reporting in metabolic and bariatric surgery. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2015;11(3):489–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Pontiroli AE, Ceriani V, Folli F. Patients’ expectations are important for success in bariatric surgery. Obes Surg. 2017;27(9):2469–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Jumbe S, Meyrick J. Contrasting views of the post-bariatric surgery experience between patients and their practitioners: a qualitative study. Obes Surg. 2018;28:2447–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Ghaferi AA, Lindsay-Westphal C. Bariatric surgery—more than just an operation. JAMA Surg. 2016;151(3):232–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Health and Caring SciencesWestern Norway University of Applied SciencesFørdeNorway
  2. 2.Department of Global Public Health and Primary CareUniversity of BergenBergenNorway
  3. 3.Department of Family Medicine and Community HealthDuke University School of MedicineDurhamUSA
  4. 4.Centre of Health ResearchDistrict General Hospital of FørdeFørdeNorway

Personalised recommendations